Seattle Police Detective Donna Stangeland
vs. Victoria Forester Courtland (June 2007)
vs. Victoria Forester Courtland (June 2007)
On 06/06/2006, Seattle Police Detective Donna Stangeland was assigned to investigate a so-called sexual assault case manipulated by write Mrs. Victoria Courtland (aka: "V.C.", "Victoria Forester", "Victoria Forester Courtland") See FACT-76 below.
On 06/04/2007, in the 2007 open court, Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") told the jury that the purpose she flew to Seattle from the East Coast in December of 2004, was asking Charlie Cheng for her “uterine prolapse."
But, Mrs. Courtland's seeing-me-for-her-uterine-prolapse claim had been disproved by Seattle Police Detective Donna Stangeland in the 06/06/2007 public Court, where she said, " She (Victoria Courtland) told me that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time she saw him (in December of 2004)." (See FACT-78 below)'
Regarding Victoria Courtland's December-2004 baseless 'uterine prolapse' claim, Detective Donna Stangeland's 06/06/2007 public statement was contrary to Mrs. Courtland's. See FACT-51, infra).
Prosecutor Ms. Jensen advised the trial Court that Victoria Courtland's statements were "not exactly consistent." （See FACT-53 below）
IN 2019, VICTORIA FORESTER
COURTLAND ASKED THE COURT
TO TERMINIATE MY 2007
RESTITUTION PAYMENT TO HER
In February of 2019 - Five years later after Victoria Forester Courtland read this website in 2015 - i I was informed by Prosecutor D. R. that (2007) State's witness Victoria Courtland ("V.C.") voluntarily asked the King County Prosecutor's Office to plead the Court to stop my payment to her restitution (she asked 11 years ago). See below.
四年之后她成为了一位新人，因为在2019年她主动要求法庭终止她在2007年向我索赔的要求。见下面检查官2019给我的信。
四年之后她成为了一位新人，因为在2019年她主动要求法庭终止她在2007年向我索赔的要求。见下面检查官2019给我的信。
