Mathew Courtland vs. Victoria Courtland
V.C.'s Husband Disclosed V.C.'s Full
Name at the Public Court in 2007.
Name at the Public Court in 2007.
On 06/05/2007 at Washington State Superior Court, Matthew Courtland disclosed her wife's name to the public as: "Victoria Courtland" , "Victoria Ann Forester Courtland."
V.C.'s husband Mathew (Matt) M. M. Courtland arrived in Seattle "aroud 12/22/2004" (see FACT-56 below).
V.C.'s husband disproved Victoria
Forester Courtland's claim. He said
that he had been with Mrs. Courtland
all three visit of me in 2004.
Forester Courtland's claim. He said
that he had been with Mrs. Courtland
all three visit of me in 2004.
At the public trial, V.C. claimed under oath that she was being 'sexually assaulted' by me during my second treatment session in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
V.C. claimed that the reason she didn't tell her husband about the alleged sexual touching after her second visit because her mother took her to see me for the said 'second treatment', and her husband was even not being there during the so-called 'second' visit.
However, V.C.'s husband provided a opposited fact. He said under oath, "I know I went with her three times" (see below line 21, page 160 of the court official transcript dated 06/05/2007).
Mr. Courtland insisted that his mother-in-law (V.C. mother) was not there during V.C's first two visit (see MATT-02 below page 160, lines 11-15). In another word, according to Mr. Courtland's sworn testimony, during V.C.'s second visit in December of 2004, he had been with his wife V.C., not V.C.'s mother.
V.C. claimed that the reason she didn't tell her husband about the alleged sexual touching after her second visit because her mother took her to see me for the said 'second treatment', and her husband was even not being there during the so-called 'second' visit.
However, V.C.'s husband provided a opposited fact. He said under oath, "I know I went with her three times" (see below line 21, page 160 of the court official transcript dated 06/05/2007).
Mr. Courtland insisted that his mother-in-law (V.C. mother) was not there during V.C's first two visit (see MATT-02 below page 160, lines 11-15). In another word, according to Mr. Courtland's sworn testimony, during V.C.'s second visit in December of 2004, he had been with his wife V.C., not V.C.'s mother.
I was confused, regarding the key question -- who took V.C. to see me in December of 2004 for V.C.'s so-called 'second treatment session' -- why did Mr. Courtland and his wife Victoria Forester Courtland have two opposite answers?
(NOTE: Mr. Courtland claimed that he went with V.C. all of "three times", not V.C.'s mother. However, V.C.'s sister Susan Goodall told the jury under oath that her mother went to my office all the 'three'. See SG-03.)
(NOTE: Mr. Courtland claimed that he went with V.C. all of "three times", not V.C.'s mother. However, V.C.'s sister Susan Goodall told the jury under oath that her mother went to my office all the 'three'. See SG-03.)
Regarding V.C.'s first visit,
V.C.'shusband under oath,
"She told me ... she was happy."
At the 2007 open trial, Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") created two non-existing 'facts' against me under oath. Mrs.
V.C. claimed that: (1) I 'grabbed' her milky breasts and 'jerked' repeatedly In her first visit (V.C. called it as 'massage treatment' or 'massage'); (2) I inserted my finger into her vagina during her second visit.
Regarding V.C.'s first visit, Mr. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her wife V.C. "was happy" with the first visit (see Matt-03 below).
V.C. claimed that: (1) I 'grabbed' her milky breasts and 'jerked' repeatedly In her first visit (V.C. called it as 'massage treatment' or 'massage'); (2) I inserted my finger into her vagina during her second visit.
Regarding V.C.'s first visit, Mr. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her wife V.C. "was happy" with the first visit (see Matt-03 below).
Regarding V.C.'s second visit, Mr. Courtland told the Jury under oath that he didn't note her wife V.C.'s demeanor was any unsual when she got into his car after the second visit (see MATT-04, below).
(Note: V.C. also told the Jury under oath that after the second visit, she didn't leave my office not felling fearful. )
(Note: V.C. also told the Jury under oath that after the second visit, she didn't leave my office not felling fearful. )
Mr. Courtland said under oath,
"It sounded like they had a
very good relationship"
(see Matt-05)
In order to back up Mrs. V.C.'s claim,
Mr. Courtland provided 4 different
versions of conflicting statements
regarding when V.C. told him about
the (non-existing) sexual assault
Mr. Courtland provided 4 different
versions of conflicting statements
regarding when V.C. told him about
the (non-existing) sexual assault
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
'NO PRIVACY' CLAIM HAD BEEN
DISPROVED BY HER HUSBAND
On 06/05/2006, Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) made a false report to the Seattle Police Department claiming that she had been sexually assaulted by me during her December-2004 treatment sessions for her 'uterine prolapse'.
On 06/05/2007 in the trial, Prosecutor Heather Jensen asked V.C. when did she tell her husband about the alleged December-2004 touching ASAp, V.C. replied, "there was not a lot of privacy and not a lot of time -- we didn't have our own car ..." (see FACT-15 below). However, Mr. Courtland's testimony indicated that V.C. and him did have 'privacy' inside of the car (see FACT-15).
On 06/06/2007 in the trial, Detective Donna Stangeland told the Jury that she was told by V.C. that during the December visit, V.C. had not been diagnosed with 'uterine prolapse'.
On 06/05/2007 in the trial, Prosecutor Heather Jensen asked V.C. when did she tell her husband about the alleged December-2004 touching ASAp, V.C. replied, "there was not a lot of privacy and not a lot of time -- we didn't have our own car ..." (see FACT-15 below). However, Mr. Courtland's testimony indicated that V.C. and him did have 'privacy' inside of the car (see FACT-15).
On 06/06/2007 in the trial, Detective Donna Stangeland told the Jury that she was told by V.C. that during the December visit, V.C. had not been diagnosed with 'uterine prolapse'.
