This website is named after the biblical phrase "Speaking the Truth in Love" (Ephesians 4:15).
本網站名稱源自聖經《以弗所書》4:15:「憑愛心說誠實話」。
本網站名稱源自聖經《以弗所書》4:15:「憑愛心說誠實話」。
Bullying is contrary to biblical teaching and hinders the spread of Christ's love. After I published the Church Anti-Bullying Training Manual on November 11, 2025, some readers commented that principles alone were not enough—they wanted a real-life example. I hope my forthcoming fact-based memoir, The Truth Behind Pastor Ray Yang and the July 20, 2025 Fourth-Degree Assault Case, will help advance the Gospel through truth and accountability . Photos below are featured in the memoir.
霸凌行為違反聖經的教導,也阻礙基督大愛的傳揚。本網主於 2025 年 11 月 11 日出版《教會反霸凌培訓手冊》後,有讀者表示,單有理論仍不足以令人信服,希望能有真實案例作為說明。因此,筆者撰寫了即將出版、以事實為根據的回憶錄《2025年7月20日楊睿傳道四級襲擊案真相》。盼望本書能幫助讀者更深入認識聖經所教導的愛、真理與責任,並有助於福音的傳揚。下面的圖片資料,將收錄於新回憶錄中。
霸凌行為違反聖經的教導,也阻礙基督大愛的傳揚。本網主於 2025 年 11 月 11 日出版《教會反霸凌培訓手冊》後,有讀者表示,單有理論仍不足以令人信服,希望能有真實案例作為說明。因此,筆者撰寫了即將出版、以事實為根據的回憶錄《2025年7月20日楊睿傳道四級襲擊案真相》。盼望本書能幫助讀者更深入認識聖經所教導的愛、真理與責任,並有助於福音的傳揚。下面的圖片資料,將收錄於新回憶錄中。
Charlie Y. Cheng (Charlie Cheng), the owner of this website, was highly praised by Elder Han-Chi Lin, along with Small Group Leader Norman and his wife (see below)本網執行長 Charlie Y. Cheng (查理)曾受到林漢奇長老、小組長 Norman 及其夫人的高度評價(見下文)。
Church leader Sister Chen, Sandy Mau, wrote to me: "Having you with us is a blessing to our church. Praise the Lord." (See the screenshot below.)
Elder Ricky Wong wrote to me:
"Thank you for your thoughtful care.
It is a blessing for the members
of Group 5 to have your support and care!"
下面是黃偉國長老曾經給予鄭志愚這樣的評價。
"Thank you for your thoughtful care.
It is a blessing for the members
of Group 5 to have your support and care!"
下面是黃偉國長老曾經給予鄭志愚這樣的評價。
The screenshot below shows Perplexity's online search results for Charlie Y. Cheng.
On September 7, 2007, I was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to seven and a half years in prison for an alleged sex crime that I did not commit. In fact, I was not even at the alleged crime scene. After my release on May 20, 2014, I wrote my memoir, FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony, shown below.
2007 年9月7日,我因從未發生過的所謂性犯罪,被冤判七年半徒刑。事實上,我根本不在所謂的案發現場。2014 年 5 月 20 日出獄後,我寫下了上面這本回憶錄《FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony》(《饒恕:一位無辜囚犯的見證》)。
In the Court on 09/07/2007, Defense attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared publicly, "Mr. Cheng is a fine, fine human being." See page 14 of the 09/07/2007 court-approved transcript (below).
【上图】律师Scott J. Engelhard 告诉法庭:“鄭先生是一位非常、非常好的人”(2007年9月7日法院记录的第14页)
On 09/09/2008, a year later after I was being wrongfully convicted for the so-called sex crime I didn't commit, Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me after she reviewed the entire of courts records:
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." (see FACT-52 below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年,华盛顿州著名的上诉律师N.在审视完全部的法庭档案后、写给我:“你(笔者)是位无辜者,被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” (下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." (see FACT-52 below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年,华盛顿州著名的上诉律师N.在审视完全部的法庭档案后、写给我:“你(笔者)是位无辜者,被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” (下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
The following letters are only a small portion of the many letters that my former patients sent to the trial judge, providing evidence of my good medical ethics and expressing their belief that I had been wrongly convicted.
下面列出的,只是我前病人寫給審判庭法官信件、指出我被冤判的眾多信件中的一部分,她們證明了我醫德良好。
Regarding Victoria Forester Courtland's inconsistent words, Prosetuting attorney Heather Jensen informed the court publicly, " Ms. Courtland with her reports to KCSARC, which is not exactly consistent with what she has ssaid during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strength of the State's case" (see Fact-53 below).
上面是在2007年5月29日的審判庭上,檢查官告訴法官:“原告Courtland女士證詞前後不一致。”
- NOTICE -
Victoria Forester Courtland (“V.C.”), the accuser and the state witness against me, disclosed her name to the public in the open court on 06/04/2007 (see "Who's Victoria Courtland"). Thus, she's a "limited purpose" PUBLIC FIGURE on the basis that she "thrust themselves (herself) to the forefront of particular public controversies in order to influence the resolution of the issues involved." Citing Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974) 418 U.S. 323, 345; See legal definition of "public figure" at http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p117.htm
THANKS TO MY LAWYERS BELOW
Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum!
Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud!
Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum!
Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud!











