The true story of Victoria Forester-Courtland ("V.C.") and Charlie Y. Cheng.
Why Innocent Prisoner, Charlie Y. Cheng, Would Forgive Those Who
Fabricated Non-existent Sex Crimes Against Him For Their Own Gains?
为什么蒙冤被打入美国大牢‘七年’的笔者，
会原谅那些谎编 ‘性侵’ 来恶意陷害他的人?
Fabricated Non-existent Sex Crimes Against Him For Their Own Gains?
为什么蒙冤被打入美国大牢‘七年’的笔者，
会原谅那些谎编 ‘性侵’ 来恶意陷害他的人?
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
I, Charlie Y. Cheng, the victim of the 2007 famous wrongful conviction (No. 06-01-05678-3 WA) which was made up upon the false accusations of K.R. (who 'lent' a $10,000.00 to her female friends C.N. & B.C. be the State's witnesses but both of them were impeached at a pretrial hearing, see infra) and V.C. (Victoria Forester-Courtland) who told the Jury, "I do like creating stories. "
我是著名的美国华盛顿州2007年冤案（No. 06-01-05678-3 WA）的受害者。诬告者是 "K.R." （她借了一万美金给女友C.N. 和 B.C.为她作伪证，但她这两位女子的证人资格后来受到了'弹劾'）和 “V.C.” （她告诉审判团她喜欢编故事）。
我是著名的美国华盛顿州2007年冤案（No. 06-01-05678-3 WA）的受害者。诬告者是 "K.R." （她借了一万美金给女友C.N. 和 B.C.为她作伪证，但她这两位女子的证人资格后来受到了'弹劾'）和 “V.C.” （她告诉审判团她喜欢编故事）。
, NOTE： V.C.‘s stories that being created under oath at the King County Superior Court in 2007, including numerous contrary 'facts' (e.g., at the 6/5/2007 trial, she denied the crucial fact that she was knowing accuser K.R. ; then, at the 9/7/2007 restitution hearing, she changed to an opposite story that she actually encouraged this woman "to come forward gain" -- had been documented on the court transcripts, click Victoria Forester-Courtland for details ).
事实上，她在法庭上也真的编了许多前后矛盾的故事，比如：她一方面宣誓从不认识检方证人K.R., 但又宣称，是她怂恿K.R.再次出面，详情请点击 Victoria Forester-Courtland.）。
After the 2007 wrongful conviction, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court received dozens of opposing letters (infra) in support of Charlie Y. Cheng because I am the 'fine, fine human being' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) .
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是一位非常好的人" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
事实上，她在法庭上也真的编了许多前后矛盾的故事，比如：她一方面宣誓从不认识检方证人K.R., 但又宣称，是她怂恿K.R.再次出面，详情请点击 Victoria Forester-Courtland.）。
After the 2007 wrongful conviction, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court received dozens of opposing letters (infra) in support of Charlie Y. Cheng because I am the 'fine, fine human being' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) .
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是一位非常好的人" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
Before the false accusations of Victoria Forester-Courtland (AKA：Victoria Forester, "V.C.") being created in June 2006 (details see infra) for her own gain, I had NO criminal history.
在我受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。
After the 2007 wrongful conviction, I was informed by my appeallate attorney who reviewed the complete court records: "You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ..." （see below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
When I was being incarcerated at the Airway Heights Corrections (AHCC), I was an unique innocent prisoner who would receive Sen. Patty Murray's e-invitation dated 10/12/2009 to join a luncheon with Vice President Joe Biden on 11/16/2009 in Seattle (see the screenshot of her 10/12/09 email to me, below).
我曾经是一位很特殊的‘囚犯’。当我还在美国大牢服刑时，收到过美国联邦参议员帕蒂-玛瑞热情的邀请函、请我同她一起参加2009年11月16日同美国副总统拜登在西雅图的餐会（见下面电邮截图）。
我曾经是一位很特殊的‘囚犯’。当我还在美国大牢服刑时，收到过美国联邦参议员帕蒂-玛瑞热情的邀请函、请我同她一起参加2009年11月16日同美国副总统拜登在西雅图的餐会（见下面电邮截图）。
Today, I became a lucky post-prisoner because recently I got a very special gift for my 5th Anniversary of being released from the prison. The special gift was from Victoria Forester-Courtland (AKA: Victoria Forester, "V.C."), the former accuser who declared at the 9/7/2007 open court that her 3-year-old daughter was the "victim" of me (see FACT 2, infra) even though I didn't know the baby girl and I had no physical contact with her.
Victoria Courtland's 2019 special gift was delivered to me via Prosecutor David Ryan's email dated 6/13/2019 (see below FACT 1), in which Mr. Ryan enclosed a e-copy of the Washington Superior Court's Order dated 2/25/2019. It reads: "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest. Therefore, restitution to V.C. ... are terminated." (See below "FACT-1").
我也是一位幸运的’刑满释放犯‘，最近，正值我出狱五周年之际，意外地得到了一份特殊礼物，这是来自当年诬告我的政府证人V.C.。尽管我不认识她三岁的女儿，也从来没有过接触，但是在2007年9月7日的公开法庭上，她却声称这小孩子是我的’受害者'。
V.C. 的这份特别礼物，是通过检察官R.D 的2019年6月13日电子邮件传给我。原来这是华盛顿州最高法院的2019年2月25日批件、说是批准了V.C.要求法院终止她2007年向我要求惩罚金的诉求。
Victoria Courtland's 2019 special gift was delivered to me via Prosecutor David Ryan's email dated 6/13/2019 (see below FACT 1), in which Mr. Ryan enclosed a e-copy of the Washington Superior Court's Order dated 2/25/2019. It reads: "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest. Therefore, restitution to V.C. ... are terminated." (See below "FACT-1").
我也是一位幸运的’刑满释放犯‘，最近，正值我出狱五周年之际，意外地得到了一份特殊礼物，这是来自当年诬告我的政府证人V.C.。尽管我不认识她三岁的女儿，也从来没有过接触，但是在2007年9月7日的公开法庭上，她却声称这小孩子是我的’受害者'。
V.C. 的这份特别礼物，是通过检察官R.D 的2019年6月13日电子邮件传给我。原来这是华盛顿州最高法院的2019年2月25日批件、说是批准了V.C.要求法院终止她2007年向我要求惩罚金的诉求。
Could it be true that Victoria Forester-Courtland (Victoria Forester) might have realized she was guilty in creating the 2006 false claims against me for her own gain?
她主动请求法官下令取消对我的这笔 ‘惩罚金’，是她认识到她为谋求私利而编谎的行为不对吗？
The facts about State's 2007-witness, Victoria Courtland's motivation to get $12,372.00 ($11,372.00 + $1,000) -- through creating a non-supported story against me (see infra) -- had been documented in the court's 2007 official transcript/document below.
关于政府的2007年证人V.C.通过编谎话来诬告我、企图从中获得$12,372.00的赔偿费的事实，已经在下面的2007年法庭上记录下来了。
According to the King County Superior Court official transcript dated 6/5/2007, at the open trial, Victoria Forester-Courtland declared under oath, "We didn't need money." (See FACT-2 below.)
根据法院2007年6月5日的文字记录（下面的图片FACT-2），V.C. 曾在法庭上公开宣誓，她 “不需要钱”。
关于政府的2007年证人V.C.通过编谎话来诬告我、企图从中获得$12,372.00的赔偿费的事实，已经在下面的2007年法庭上记录下来了。
According to the King County Superior Court official transcript dated 6/5/2007, at the open trial, Victoria Forester-Courtland declared under oath, "We didn't need money." (See FACT-2 below.)
根据法院2007年6月5日的文字记录（下面的图片FACT-2），V.C. 曾在法庭上公开宣誓，她 “不需要钱”。
However, three months later after Victoria Forester-Courtland made above-mentioned pubic statement ("We didn't need money") under oath, on 9/7/2007, she made a 180-degree turn -- she asked the Court for $11,372.00, plus "anticipate at least another thousand“ . Notably, in order to get the money, Victoria even declared at the open Court that her 3-year-old daughter was "a victim" of me (see below "FACT-3") .
According to the records of Washington State Superior Court dated September 7th of 2007, Victoria needed $12,372.00 to cover up her trip from the East Coast to Seattle and to treat her 3-year old daughter's biting nail habit, (see below "FACT-3") .
Unfortunately, Victoria Courtland's $12,372.00 restitution request was NOT granted by the Court! (The Court only granted her couple hundred.)
但是，就在V.C.当众宣称她 ‘不需要钱’ 后的三个月，在2007年9月7日，V.C. 却向法庭提出了索钱的诉求 -- 为得到这笔赔偿费，她居然当众谎称，硬说她的三岁女儿是我的 ’受害者‘ 。
V.C.要求法庭让我付给她$12,372.00惩罚金、说是要用来支付她从美国东海岸飞到西雅图和给女儿治疗咬指甲的坏习惯。（见下面华州高级法院2007年12月18日文字记录，FACT-3。）
遗憾的是，她2007年9月7日的$12,372.00 妄求，在2007年12月18日被法官拒绝了。
However, three months later after Victoria Forester-Courtland made above-mentioned pubic statement ("We didn't need money") under oath, on 9/7/2007, she made a 180-degree turn -- she asked the Court for $11,372.00, plus "anticipate at least another thousand“ . Notably, in order to get the money, Victoria even declared at the open Court that her 3-year-old daughter was "a victim" of me (see below "FACT-3") .
According to the records of Washington State Superior Court dated September 7th of 2007, Victoria needed $12,372.00 to cover up her trip from the East Coast to Seattle and to treat her 3-year old daughter's biting nail habit, (see below "FACT-3") .
Unfortunately, Victoria Courtland's $12,372.00 restitution request was NOT granted by the Court! (The Court only granted her couple hundred.)
但是，就在V.C.当众宣称她 ‘不需要钱’ 后的三个月，在2007年9月7日，V.C. 却向法庭提出了索钱的诉求 -- 为得到这笔赔偿费，她居然当众谎称，硬说她的三岁女儿是我的 ’受害者‘ 。
V.C.要求法庭让我付给她$12,372.00惩罚金、说是要用来支付她从美国东海岸飞到西雅图和给女儿治疗咬指甲的坏习惯。（见下面华州高级法院2007年12月18日文字记录，FACT-3。）
遗憾的是，她2007年9月7日的$12,372.00 妄求，在2007年12月18日被法官拒绝了。
P.S.: It seems to me that Victoria Courtland's above declaration to the public on 9/7/2007 revealed the secret that to get the $12,372.00 was Victoria's motivation of creating her 2006 false allegation against me, because she needs it to cover up her trip from the East Coast to the West Coast (Seattle) in order to assist her sister's first son's birth (evidence see infra).
I am a moral American citizen who had NO criminal history before Victoria Courtland's false accusation created in 2006, but was wrongfully convicted as a "sex offender".
我是一位道德良好的美国公民，却被错误地判为 ’性罪犯‘。
In order to encourage our law students and justice workers to understand their responsibility to protect our society by acting upon the law; And, to let our youth to know the importance to forgive, I built up this website of Telling Truth in 2015 after being released from the prison.
为了让美国法学院学生明白自己的职责是为维护美国宪法的正义；为了避免其他无辜者会重复我的遭遇，在我出狱的2014年，就开始了编辑这个《讲真话》网站。
Although my 'American dream‘ and my family have been seriously impacted by the irreparable disaster caused by the injustice and racialism, I did not fall down. Because I chose to obey God's teaching, to forgive those who created false accusations against me for their own gains (see infra).
虽然我的‘美国梦’和家庭因此冤案受到了难以弥补的伤害，但我没有被压倒。之所以会这样，因为我遵照了上帝的教导 -- 饶恕了那些为谋求私利而编谎话的害人者。
In 2017, I disclosed my real story with undeniable evidence in my new memoir, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" (AKA: "FORGIVENESS", see image below) . Hopefully, this valuable memoir, which is based upon fact, will be an useful reference book for the law students, justice workers, social workers, parents and the law enforcement.
2017年，我出版了这本、以无可驳倒的证据为基础的新回忆录《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》（见下图）。希望我这本2017年出版的回忆录，可成为法学院学生、司法人员、执法人员、社会工作者和父母们的参考资料。
我是一位道德良好的美国公民，却被错误地判为 ’性罪犯‘。
In order to encourage our law students and justice workers to understand their responsibility to protect our society by acting upon the law; And, to let our youth to know the importance to forgive, I built up this website of Telling Truth in 2015 after being released from the prison.
为了让美国法学院学生明白自己的职责是为维护美国宪法的正义；为了避免其他无辜者会重复我的遭遇，在我出狱的2014年，就开始了编辑这个《讲真话》网站。
Although my 'American dream‘ and my family have been seriously impacted by the irreparable disaster caused by the injustice and racialism, I did not fall down. Because I chose to obey God's teaching, to forgive those who created false accusations against me for their own gains (see infra).
虽然我的‘美国梦’和家庭因此冤案受到了难以弥补的伤害，但我没有被压倒。之所以会这样，因为我遵照了上帝的教导 -- 饶恕了那些为谋求私利而编谎话的害人者。
In 2017, I disclosed my real story with undeniable evidence in my new memoir, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" (AKA: "FORGIVENESS", see image below) . Hopefully, this valuable memoir, which is based upon fact, will be an useful reference book for the law students, justice workers, social workers, parents and the law enforcement.
2017年，我出版了这本、以无可驳倒的证据为基础的新回忆录《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》（见下图）。希望我这本2017年出版的回忆录，可成为法学院学生、司法人员、执法人员、社会工作者和父母们的参考资料。
1. At the public hearing on 5/29/2007, Prosecuting Attorney Ms. Jensen who represented the two accusers ("V.C." & "K.R."), informed the trial Judge about the statements of Victoria Forester-Courtland ("V.C."), "Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See the court transcript below.)
在2007年5月29日的公开听证会上，代表检方证人“V.C." 和“K.R."的女检查官Jensen告诉法官：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲，与她向KCSARC 机构的报案所称，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面的法庭记录。）
在2007年5月29日的公开听证会上，代表检方证人“V.C." 和“K.R."的女检查官Jensen告诉法官：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲，与她向KCSARC 机构的报案所称，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面的法庭记录。）
NOTE: More Victoria Forester-Courtland's inconsistent and contrary statements see "Q & A" section (infra).
2. Defense attorney Scott. J. Engelhard Declared, "Mr. Cheng is not quilty."
在法庭上，被告律师向陪审团宣告：“鄭先生是无罪的。”（下面是华州最高法院的庭审记录）
在法庭上，被告律师向陪审团宣告：“鄭先生是无罪的。”（下面是华州最高法院的庭审记录）
According to the record, Attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared at the open Court that Charlie Y. Cheng "is a fine, fine human being." (See below).
The defense lawyer found (see page 21 of the King County Superior Court transcript): "Mr. Cheng is not guilty" for the 2007 accusation, and he"is innocent" man (below).
3. Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, On June 1, 2007, found a constitutional issue regarding to my case, "Judge MacInners saying that she will NOT allow us to call any of your female clients as witness, I think is a bad ruling by her. and it may be a good ground to get a new trial if you are convicted." (See image below.)
我的辩护律师在2007年6月1日，发现法官的一个严重错误（不许我的女病人为我作证属违宪）后、写给我：“我认为这是她的错误。万一你被判刑，可用法官的这错误来要求重审。”
我的辩护律师在2007年6月1日，发现法官的一个严重错误（不许我的女病人为我作证属违宪）后、写给我：“我认为这是她的错误。万一你被判刑，可用法官的这错误来要求重审。”
NOTE: According to the law, in criminal case, defendant's constitutional right to call his/her witnesses is guaranteed by The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Unfortunately, my constitutional right to call my other female clients be my witnesses was deprived by the 2007 trial Court.
4. After the 6/13/2007 Conviction, Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud (now "Justice Sheryl Gordon MaCloud") met me in person at King County Jail, willing to assist my appeal.
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
Click following images for details. 请点击下面图片看细节。
Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud was referred to Mr. Cheng by Scott J. Engelhard, trial attorney. Her Honor expressed her willing to help Mr. Cheng's appeal of the 6/13/2007 conviction (click here to see the evidence).
在被误判后，著名的上诉律师Sheryl G. MaCloud（她现在是华州最高法院的大法官）专门到监狱探视本网主，并表示要接我的案子、替我上诉 。
在被误判后，著名的上诉律师Sheryl G. MaCloud（她现在是华州最高法院的大法官）专门到监狱探视本网主，并表示要接我的案子、替我上诉 。
1. In 1997, Bonnie (B.C.) who wrote me a thanks letter in 1993, referred her business partner Kathy (K.C.) to see me for treating K.R.'s back problem.
在1997， B.C. （她在1993年写过感谢信给我）介绍她的朋友K.R. 来找我治疗K.R.R的背痛。
2. On 4/10/1998, K.R. referred her Ex-husband Tim to see me for a treatment. After it, Tim scheduled next appointment: 4/17/1998.
在1998年4月10日，K.R.介绍她的前夫Tim 来找我治疗。治疗后，预约了下次治疗日期：4/17/1998.
在1998年4月10日，K.R.介绍她的前夫Tim 来找我治疗。治疗后，预约了下次治疗日期：4/17/1998.
3. After the 4/12/1998 treatment, K.R. paid me $38 from her own pocket, then scheduled next treatment of 4/16/1998.
K.R.在1998年4月12日的治疗结束后，她又约了下一次来的日期：4月16日。
K.R.在1998年4月12日的治疗结束后，她又约了下一次来的日期：4月16日。
4. On 4/12/1998 (Easter Sunday), around 6-6:30 p.m., Mr. & Mrs. Wang and their 2 sons came over to see me. We had pictures taken.
1998年4月12日晚上约6-6:30时，王先生夫妇和两个儿子来诊所看我，我们还一起合影留念。
1998年4月12日晚上约6-6:30时，王先生夫妇和两个儿子来诊所看我，我们还一起合影留念。
5. On 4/13/1998, I sent to K.R. a certified mail to cancel her 4/16/1998 and her husband's 4/17/1998 appointment because of K.R.'s improper sex desire on me happened on 4/12/1998 before 6 p.m. （Kathy left my office before 6 p.m.）
6. A month later after receiving of my 4/13/1998 certified letter, K.R. star writing a complaint on 5/19/1998. She 'loaned' her friend Cheyl (C.B.) $10,000.00. Then, C.B. corroborated with K.R. in making the 1998 false claim against me.
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Mrs. Courtland (Victoria Forester) Made Contradictory Statements Under Oath.
According to the Court's transcript dated 9/7/2007, at a Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland (VC) disclosed a secret that before the 2007 trial, she actually "met" K.R., the State's another witness/accuser, and she encouraged K R. ”to come forward again" (see the image below, Fig. 174 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS)."
Notably, V.C.'s above declaration being contradicted to her prior statement made at the Washington State Superior Court under oath, 6/5/2007 (see Fig. 173 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS, below).
According to the Court's transcript dated 9/7/2007, at a Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland (VC) disclosed a secret that before the 2007 trial, she actually "met" K.R., the State's another witness/accuser, and she encouraged K R. ”to come forward again" (see the image below, Fig. 174 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS)."
Notably, V.C.'s above declaration being contradicted to her prior statement made at the Washington State Superior Court under oath, 6/5/2007 (see Fig. 173 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS, below).
上图是我英文回忆录 “FORGIVENESS：An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony” （要原谅：一个无辜囚犯的证词）
的第159页。里面的173图是诬陷我的VC在法庭上坦承认她见过检方的另一个证人，并且怂恿她到法庭作证
来反对我；174图，是VC在法庭上公开宣誓后称，她从来不认识检方的这个证人。(前后矛盾！）
的第159页。里面的173图是诬陷我的VC在法庭上坦承认她见过检方的另一个证人，并且怂恿她到法庭作证
来反对我；174图，是VC在法庭上公开宣誓后称，她从来不认识检方的这个证人。(前后矛盾！）
Regarding Mrs. Courtland's motivation Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against Mr. Cheng."
After I was wrongfully convicted, my former patients asked Judge Nicole Macinnes: "Please do not llow a miscarriage of justice"
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。
After the conviction, before the sentence hearing, Hon. Nicole MacInnes, the trial judge received 30+ letters from the public in
support Charlie Y. Cheng and in opposing the unfair trial. The letter below is one of them, in which Christine D. wrote: "I have always
been grateful to Dr. Daniel Schiff for referring me to Dr. Cheng;" "Dr. Cheng is a highly professional, very business-like, yet caring health
provider. ... Please do not allow a miscarriage of justice." More see sub-page: 'WHO IS CHARLIE Y. CHENG?" ( or click image below).
support Charlie Y. Cheng and in opposing the unfair trial. The letter below is one of them, in which Christine D. wrote: "I have always
been grateful to Dr. Daniel Schiff for referring me to Dr. Cheng;" "Dr. Cheng is a highly professional, very business-like, yet caring health
provider. ... Please do not allow a miscarriage of justice." More see sub-page: 'WHO IS CHARLIE Y. CHENG?" ( or click image below).
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q1： After the appellate layer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women," why would you forgive them?
为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？
为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？
I forgave "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯”
此原因，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯”
此原因，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
Q2： How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?
I had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison. I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
Q3： Why is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?
本冤案实情在网上公布后，当事人（鄭志愚）会受到生命威胁？
Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing racialism！ 是存在这种危险性，因为种族主义的存在！
本冤案实情在网上公布后，当事人（鄭志愚）会受到生命威胁？
Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing racialism！ 是存在这种危险性，因为种族主义的存在！
Q1： Isn't it true that the K.R.'s complaint dated 5/18/1998, of which the DOH received on 5/26/1998, was being written a month later after receiving of your 4/13/1998 certified letter against K.R.'s improper sex behavior over you happened on 4/12/1998?
是这样吗，卫生厅在1998年5月26日收到K.R.在98年5月18日开始写的投诉、是在收到你98年4月13日寄给K.C.的挂号信（信里谴责了她4月12日对你不当的性侵犯行为）之后？
Yes, that's true. The content of my 4/13/1998 certified letter against K.R.'s improper sex desire on me is being disclosed on page 40-42 of my memoir, "FORGIVENESS“ (see image 'KR-1', below).
I wrote her, "This letter is explain [to] you why I left message on your answering machine last night to cancel your next appointment on 04/16/98. I said I don't feel comfortable to continue to give your treatment because I feel yur romance just like a harassment according to the Chinese way ... By the way, please infor[m] Tom, his appointment on 04/17/1998 will be cancel[led] too ... You are the person should tellhime the reasons if he asks ..." (infra).
这是千真万确。 关于我1998年4月13日给Kathy挂号信的内容（提到我取消她4月16日和她先生的17日治疗预约，是因为她在4月12日下午治疗结束给我的法式接吻是我不能接受的，因我是一位基督徒，按照我们华人的传统观点，她这种行为属于性骚扰，等等）。该信的复印件我已经在回忆录《要饶恕》的第40-42页中刊出（请见下图）。
是这样吗，卫生厅在1998年5月26日收到K.R.在98年5月18日开始写的投诉、是在收到你98年4月13日寄给K.C.的挂号信（信里谴责了她4月12日对你不当的性侵犯行为）之后？
Yes, that's true. The content of my 4/13/1998 certified letter against K.R.'s improper sex desire on me is being disclosed on page 40-42 of my memoir, "FORGIVENESS“ (see image 'KR-1', below).
I wrote her, "This letter is explain [to] you why I left message on your answering machine last night to cancel your next appointment on 04/16/98. I said I don't feel comfortable to continue to give your treatment because I feel yur romance just like a harassment according to the Chinese way ... By the way, please infor[m] Tom, his appointment on 04/17/1998 will be cancel[led] too ... You are the person should tellhime the reasons if he asks ..." (infra).
这是千真万确。 关于我1998年4月13日给Kathy挂号信的内容（提到我取消她4月16日和她先生的17日治疗预约，是因为她在4月12日下午治疗结束给我的法式接吻是我不能接受的，因我是一位基督徒，按照我们华人的传统观点，她这种行为属于性骚扰，等等）。该信的复印件我已经在回忆录《要饶恕》的第40-42页中刊出（请见下图）。
On 4/13/1998, Monday, I sent the original letter to Kathy (K.R.) with certified mail # 383 184 199 (see Fig. 23 on page 42 of "FORGIVENESS", below).
On the next day, 4/14/1998, Tuesday, I found that I did not pay for Return Receipt Service when I sent out the original one on Monday. So, on April 14 (Tuesday), I sent the copy of my 4/13/1998 letter to Kathy (K.R.) again by another certified mail with USPS Return Receipt service -- I paid an extra $1.10 'return receipt shipping' fee for it (see below Fig. 34 on page 42 of the memoir).
Notably, my second certified mail (P 383 184 198) was sen to "Mrs. Kathy P" ("P" was Kathy's ex-husband's last name) on April 14, 1998. Kathy did not pick up but her ex-husband Tom P. did. And, Tom signed the return receipt on April 16 of 1998 (see Fig. 35 on page 43 of my memoir, below).
1998年4月13日，我将挂号信的原件寄给Kathy R. （那时她还挂夫姓P），自己留了份复印件。次日，因发现13日寄出的挂号原件，没有买让对方签收的回邮单，所以在4月14日我将13日留底用的复印件、又复印了一遍寄给K.R.（下面书的第42页有我在1998年4月13和14日两次寄出挂号给Kathy的收据）。下面书第43页的收据（Fig. 35）是K.R.的先生Tim在4月16日签收的回邮单。
On the next day, 4/14/1998, Tuesday, I found that I did not pay for Return Receipt Service when I sent out the original one on Monday. So, on April 14 (Tuesday), I sent the copy of my 4/13/1998 letter to Kathy (K.R.) again by another certified mail with USPS Return Receipt service -- I paid an extra $1.10 'return receipt shipping' fee for it (see below Fig. 34 on page 42 of the memoir).
Notably, my second certified mail (P 383 184 198) was sen to "Mrs. Kathy P" ("P" was Kathy's ex-husband's last name) on April 14, 1998. Kathy did not pick up but her ex-husband Tom P. did. And, Tom signed the return receipt on April 16 of 1998 (see Fig. 35 on page 43 of my memoir, below).
1998年4月13日，我将挂号信的原件寄给Kathy R. （那时她还挂夫姓P），自己留了份复印件。次日，因发现13日寄出的挂号原件，没有买让对方签收的回邮单，所以在4月14日我将13日留底用的复印件、又复印了一遍寄给K.R.（下面书的第42页有我在1998年4月13和14日两次寄出挂号给Kathy的收据）。下面书第43页的收据（Fig. 35）是K.R.的先生Tim在4月16日签收的回邮单。
The DOH (Department of Health) received the complaint of K.R. (AKA: "Kathy P") on 5/26/1998 which was 5 weeks after receiving of my 4/13/1998 certified letter against V.C.'s 4/12/1998 sex harassment over me. (See KR-3 below ).
卫生厅是在1998年5月26日才收到K.R.编造、反对我的故事 -- 这已经是在她收到我4月13日寄出、反对她4月12日性骚扰我的挂号信的第五个星期了（请见 下图KR-3）。
卫生厅是在1998年5月26日才收到K.R.编造、反对我的故事 -- 这已经是在她收到我4月13日寄出、反对她4月12日性骚扰我的挂号信的第五个星期了（请见 下图KR-3）。
Q2： Isn't it true that the DOH spent 3-year length in investigating K.R.'s and her two friends' claims against you, bu did not find any of wrong doing in your side?
这是真的吗？卫生厅用了三年的时间调查K.R.和她朋友对你的指控，但最后发现你没有错？
Yes, that's true. The DOH received K.R.'s complaint on 5/26/1998，Their conclusion had been documented on the "AGREED ORDER" signed by the Judge on 11/23/2001, in which the facts about K.R.'s complaint were documented as：
“Patient A (K.R.) made a false complaint against Respondent (Mr. Cheng) in retaliation for his refused to continue treating her, and (b) Patient B (Bonnie C.) and C (Cheryl B., C.N.) made false claims against Respondent (Mr. Cheng) because Patient B and C are frikends of Patient A." (see image KR-5 below)
这是真的。关于K.R.诬告的事实，在卫生厅2001年11月23日与我签署的和解决案（”Agreed Order")中是这样记载的：“病人A（即K.R.）的指控，是因为被告（鄭先生）拒绝再继续给她治疗；病人B（即K.R.的朋友Bonnie, B.C.）和病人C （即K.R.的朋友Cheryl, C.B.）的诬告是因为她们是K.R.的朋友。”（请见下面KR-5图片中2001年决案中放大部分。）
这是真的吗？卫生厅用了三年的时间调查K.R.和她朋友对你的指控，但最后发现你没有错？
Yes, that's true. The DOH received K.R.'s complaint on 5/26/1998，Their conclusion had been documented on the "AGREED ORDER" signed by the Judge on 11/23/2001, in which the facts about K.R.'s complaint were documented as：
“Patient A (K.R.) made a false complaint against Respondent (Mr. Cheng) in retaliation for his refused to continue treating her, and (b) Patient B (Bonnie C.) and C (Cheryl B., C.N.) made false claims against Respondent (Mr. Cheng) because Patient B and C are frikends of Patient A." (see image KR-5 below)
这是真的。关于K.R.诬告的事实，在卫生厅2001年11月23日与我签署的和解决案（”Agreed Order")中是这样记载的：“病人A（即K.R.）的指控，是因为被告（鄭先生）拒绝再继续给她治疗；病人B（即K.R.的朋友Bonnie, B.C.）和病人C （即K.R.的朋友Cheryl, C.B.）的诬告是因为她们是K.R.的朋友。”（请见下面KR-5图片中2001年决案中放大部分。）
Q3: Before you were charged in 2006 -- from 1998 to 2006 -- have you been interviewed by any detective for the purpose to verify or authenticate K.R.'s 1998 false complaint？
在2006年你被起诉之前，在1998到2006年的漫长期间，有没有过任何一位警方侦探来找你核实过这女人的诬告？
No.
Regarding the matter of K.R.'s false allegations dated 5/19/1998 of which was filed 5 weeks later after she and her husband received my 4/13/1998 certified letter against K.R.'s 4/12/1998 improper sex desire over me (see Image KR-1 and KR-2, supra), I had never been interviewed by any detective since 1998.
自从K.R.的1998年5月19日的投诉，到2006年我被起诉，从没有任何一位警方侦探来找我查证关于Kathy R. 的诬告。
Q4: Isn't it true that the Count-One charge in the detective's Probable Cause filed on 6/29/2006, was based on K.R.'s 1998 complaint which had not been found any wrong in your side by the Department of Health (DOH)?
有这样的事吗，在2006年的起诉书上你的第一项‘罪名’是基于K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查的结果发现你没违规，对吗？
Yes！
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q1: How and when did you know Victoria Forester-Coutland?
A1：In 1998, Victoria was referred to me by her friend "Mitch", a psychologist who's my former client, after she felt down from a ladder and injured herself.
A1：In 1998, Victoria was referred to me by her friend "Mitch", a psychologist who's my former client, after she felt down from a ladder and injured herself.
Q2: Was Victoria's surname "Courtland" when you give her treatments in 1998 -2002?
A2：No. That time Victoria's last name was "Forester", which being documented in her 1998 and 2002 Registration forms.
A2：No. That time Victoria's last name was "Forester", which being documented in her 1998 and 2002 Registration forms.
Q3: At the trial, Victoria told the Jury under oath that she had been suffering from 'very painful' uterine prolapse that being generated after her first baby born in August of 2004 when she lived in the East Coast where she have been living and working since 2002, She told the Jury that the reason she did not see any physician there but rather fly from the West Coast to the West Coast to see you in December 2004 to treat her uterine prolapse, because she and you 'always' have a 'doctor and patient' relationship'. Have you claimed to her that you are her doctor?
A3: No.
A3: No.
Unfinished. More coming soon ...
Q4:
Q4: Victoria
Q: Why did Victoria Forester-Courtland (V.C.) make the 2006 false claims against you?
为何
为何
V1： Isn't it true that Vitoria Forester Courtland created a non-existing fact that she was sexually assaulted by you during the-said second session in treating her 'uterine prolapse'? And, isn't it true that she told the Jury that after the second session, she then came over again for a third treatment session?
V.C.是否编了故事，称你在第二次治疗她‘子宫下垂’时骚扰她。之后，她又来第三次？
V.C.是否编了故事，称你在第二次治疗她‘子宫下垂’时骚扰她。之后，她又来第三次？
V2： At the open court on 6/5/2007, why would Mr. Engelhard tell the trial Judge, "there is absolutely no basis for her claim of uterine prolapse" ?
为什么在2007年6月5日的公开法庭上，辩护律师告诉法官：“检方证人V.C.‘的子宫下垂故事是虚构的？
为什么在2007年6月5日的公开法庭上，辩护律师告诉法官：“检方证人V.C.‘的子宫下垂故事是虚构的？
At the 6/6/2007 trial, Detective Stangeland disproved V.C.'s claim that I treated Mrs. Courtland's uterine prolapse. She disclosed this secret to the Jury, "She (V.C.) told me that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time she saw him (me)." See image below, page 70 of the King County Superior Court official transcript dated June 6, 2007.
因为V.C.在2007年12月见我时，不是为治疗所谓的她患有 "子宫下垂" 。关于这个事实的秘密，警探 S.是在2007年6月6日向陪审团透露的。她说：“她（V.C.）没有过这治疗。她告诉过我，在他们见面的那段时间，她没有被诊断过患有子宫下垂。“（请见下面法庭的庭审记录）
因为V.C.在2007年12月见我时，不是为治疗所谓的她患有 "子宫下垂" 。关于这个事实的秘密，警探 S.是在2007年6月6日向陪审团透露的。她说：“她（V.C.）没有过这治疗。她告诉过我，在他们见面的那段时间，她没有被诊断过患有子宫下垂。“（请见下面法庭的庭审记录）
V4： Isn't it true that one side, Victoria Courtland (V.C.) told the Court she "didn't need money", but on another side she asked the Court for a $12,372.00 of restitution?
是不是真有这样的事：V.C. 一方面在法庭上说她不需要钱；但在另一方面，她又向法庭要$12,372 赔偿金？法官批准她的诉求没？
是不是真有这样的事：V.C. 一方面在法庭上说她不需要钱；但在另一方面，她又向法庭要$12,372 赔偿金？法官批准她的诉求没？
Yes， That's true.
According to the King County Superior Court's records, at the 6/5/2007 Court, V.C. declared, "we didn't need money" (see Fig. 1 below)
According to the King County Superior Court's records, at the 6/5/2007 Court, V.C. declared, "we didn't need money" (see Fig. 1 below)
At the 9/7/2007 Court, V.C. created a 'fact' that her 3-year old daughter 'had been a victim' of mine; then asked the Court to order me to pay her a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her travel expenses, including to treat her daughter's biting-nail habit (see Fig. 2 below).
下面是检方证人 V.C.声称她三岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”、要求法官让我付她惩罚金$12,372.00的法庭记录。
下面是检方证人 V.C.声称她三岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”、要求法官让我付她惩罚金$12,372.00的法庭记录。
V5： Isn't it true that V.C.'s petition for the $12,372.00 was not being granted by the Court?
这是真的吗，法院没有批准V.C.要 $12,372.00的诉求？
That's true. Even if Victoria Forester-Court claimed that her 3-year-old daughter was "the victim" of mine, the Court did NOT issue an order to force me to pay the $12,372.00 as Victoria Forester-Courtland asked for.
这是真的。尽管检方证人V.C.向法庭要$12,372.00，并且声称她3岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”，法庭也没批准她的诉求（根本没让我付V.C. 这笔她梦想要的惩罚金）。
这是真的吗，法院没有批准V.C.要 $12,372.00的诉求？
That's true. Even if Victoria Forester-Court claimed that her 3-year-old daughter was "the victim" of mine, the Court did NOT issue an order to force me to pay the $12,372.00 as Victoria Forester-Courtland asked for.
这是真的。尽管检方证人V.C.向法庭要$12,372.00，并且声称她3岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”，法庭也没批准她的诉求（根本没让我付V.C. 这笔她梦想要的惩罚金）。
V6： Isn't it true that regarding the-said second treatment in December of 2004, Victoria
Forester-Courtland (V.C.) and her husband provided contradicted statements under oath?
是真的吗，在关于所谓的2004年12月的第二次治疗事件，V.C. 和她先生证词矛盾？
Yes， That's true. Regarding the issue whether there was the said second treatment to treat V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004, V.C. (Mrs. Courtland), and her husband (Mr. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath.
V.C. told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment (see Fig. 1 below).
V.C.编了她在2004年12月受到我的骚扰、是发生在第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂的故事。为使得陪审团可以相信是有这第二次治疗，她说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 （见下面 Fig. 1）。
Forester-Courtland (V.C.) and her husband provided contradicted statements under oath?
是真的吗，在关于所谓的2004年12月的第二次治疗事件，V.C. 和她先生证词矛盾？
Yes， That's true. Regarding the issue whether there was the said second treatment to treat V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004, V.C. (Mrs. Courtland), and her husband (Mr. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath.
V.C. told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment (see Fig. 1 below).
V.C.编了她在2004年12月受到我的骚扰、是发生在第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂的故事。为使得陪审团可以相信是有这第二次治疗，她说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 （见下面 Fig. 1）。
However, Victoria's husband, Mr. Courtland, provided an opposed statement that during the said second visit, Victoria's mother “did not attend." (See Fig. 2 below.)
但是，V.C.的先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，是他车V.C. 来做第二次治疗；他十分肯定地强调，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 （见下面 Fig. 2）。
但是，V.C.的先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，是他车V.C. 来做第二次治疗；他十分肯定地强调，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 （见下面 Fig. 2）。
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Under construction ... more coming soon
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
Charlie Y. Cheng's current videoson YouTube are:
