VICTORIA ​FORESTER COURTLAND 
MADE A FALSE REPORT TO THE POLICE
AGAINST ​​INNOCENT CHARLIE Y. CHENG
(Documentary-Memoir)

Under Construction ... 2020-07-13    10:11

T H A N K S   TO   A T T O R N E Y S : 
Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum 
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！​

Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！​
​

01
B   R   I   E   F

 
​​                This is my another memoir based upon UNDENIABLE facts which had been documented in the court-approved official transcripts (infra). 

                I'm Charlie Y. Cheng,  74, the author of 50 Q & A of Tui-Na (a well-known book in the '80s published by Great Light publishing, 1981, Hong Kong) and the founder of well-known Acu-vibra therapy, the effective muscle rehabilitation healing art which had been praised by writer Victoria Forester Courtland (AKA: Victoria Forester, Victoria Courtland, "V.C.") as:  "I feel like on that level he (Charlie Cheng) is like a healing force in my life" (see FACT-27).  

               On 12/21/2004, I REJECTED Victoria Forester Courtland's two (2) requests (to use our photos taken in 2000 showing that she and I were shaking hands with smiling in front of my clinic sign [see FACT-31 infra];  and she asked me to give her the exclusive right to write my story about my victory over K.R.'s and her friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s 1998 false allegations because she'd learned that retired English professor Alexander J. Maxwell was going to write the same story).

               On 7/22/2005, V.C. called  the KCSARC (King County Sex Assault Resource Center) asking how to make a sexual assault report against a healthcare provider that was happening 'several years ago'. The manager of the KCSARC advised V.C. to call the Seattle Police but she didn't.  On or around 7/25/2005, the KCSARC closed V.C.'s case.
               
             On 06/06/2006  -- almost a year after talking to the KCSARC and one and a year half after my rejection to V.C.'s two request on 12/21/2004 -- Victoria Forester Courtland suddenly made a FALSE sexual assault report against me to the Seattle Police.  She claimed that she 'discovered' her "uterine prolapse" problem in August of 2004 just after her daughter was born in the East Coast where she has been living since 2001.  She said that it was a very painful condition but she never saw a physician or O.B. in the East Coast   According to V.C., she rather waited  to December of 2004 (four months after discovering of the said 'uterine prolapse' problem) to come to Seattle to see me for the so-called uterine prolapse because (according to V.C.'s 06/05/2007 public statement) she and I had a patient-and-doctor relationship. 
     
​               NOTE:  I was charged as a 'second degree rape' based upon Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland false claim that on the 12/17/2004 Seattle visit, I 'inserted' my thumb into her vagina that made her very uncomfortable.  According to V.C.'s public statement, after the said '12/17/2004 treatment for her uterine prolapse and related back pain, her husband and father drove her to see me again on 12/21/2004, but she didn't ask them to stay with her during the said 12/21/2004 treatment session.  V.C. said that I did not touch her sex organ on 12/21/2004 (see infra).

               On 06/09/2006, a Seattle Police detective (white female) called me and asked me to 'say sorry' to V.C. because she believed that V.C. told her the truth.  The Seattle Detective only talked me once on the phone (we never met in person before the 2007 trial).   The Detective did not ask me to provide V.C.'s 2004 medical file to the Police to verify V.C.'s allegation, nor had asked V.C. to prove her claim (being suffering the said 'uterine prolapse') was legitimatize.

               On 06/05/2007 (a year after V.C.'s 06/06/2006 false report to the Seattle Police), at the Washington State Superior Court, Mrs. Victoria Courtland said under oath, "He (Charlie Cheng) had been a trusted provider for seven years without ever touching me" (see FACT-28) ;  "I had known him (Charlie Cheng) ... seven years without any inappropriate touch (see FACT-29 infra)".   

​               ​On 09/07/2007, V.C. asked the Superior Court of Washington State for a $12,372.00 restitution against me -- according to V.C.,  she need this money to cover up her cost of air fair, baby care and to treat her 3-year-old baby girl's bad habit of biting nails, etc. (see V.C.'s public statement dated 09/07/2007).

             After the unfair 2007 conviction against me, the trial Judge received 31 letters from the public opposed the 2007 miscarriage of justice in the State of Washington (see FACT-26 infra). 

             In 2015, after I finished the 7-year jail time for an alleged sex crime I did not commit, I established this website TELLING THE TRUTH with my full name, www.CharlieYCheng.com, in which I proved the fact with undeniable evidence that I'm an innocent prisoner; and, I also gave the reason why I would forgive Victoria Forester Courtland's false accusation against innocent me for her own gain because of GOD's teaching. 

            In June of 2015, I had been informed by the Department of Correction ("DOC") that accuser Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland had read through her story being posted in my website regarding her 2006 false report to the Seattle Police. 

            In 2019, which is 12 years after V.C.s 09/07/2007 restitution request and 4 years after reading my website, Victoria Forester Courtland surrendered the restitution against me (see FACT-A below) which she's not deserve.

            In the early 2000's, writer V.C. (who published two fictions and a poem, see FACT-2 below) asked me to take pictures with her (see FACT-31 below) for her future book about my famous Acu-vibra,  a healing art that had been reported by local newspapers in many languages, e.g., English, Vietnamese and Chinese.

​                 V.C. has no work since her daughter's birth in August 2004,   On 12/09/2004, she flew to Seattle from the East Coast to assist her sister who's going to have a first baby.  Her sister's due date was postponed. While waiting for her sister to have a baby, she came to my clinic three times (12/15/2004, 12/17/2004, 12/21/2004) to buy the information regarding my 2001 victory over K.R.'s and her two friends B.C.'s, and C.B.'s 1998 false accusations (see Timeline), which is part of my stories V.C. was going to write.

                 On 12/21/2004, V.C.  learned that a retired-English professor wanted to write my story, and asked me to give her the exclusive right to write my story. She also wanted to use above photos - showing she and me were shaking hands together in front of my clinic sign (See FACT-31 below) - in her future book about me.   I rejected V.C.'s requests.  V.C. was very unhappy when she left my office on 12/21/2004.  She did not contact me since the 12/22/2004 conflict.  

​             One and a half years (18 months) AFTER my rejections to V.C.'s 12/21/2004 two requests, disaster struck!

           According to the public statement of Ms. Allen, the legal advocate manager for KCSARC (King County Sexual Assault Resource Center), on 07/22/2005 V.C. asked her how to make a sexual assault report against me (see FACT-48 infra).   Victoria Forester Courtland was encouraged to call the Seattle Police, but she did NOT take an action in 2005.  Then, the Ms. Allen closed V.C.'s case (see FACT-17 infra).

          On 06/06/2006 - after 11 months of preparation since her last call with Ms. Allen/KCSARC in July of 2005 - V.C. called the Seattle Police, and made a false claim that I 'sexually assaulted' her on 12/17/2004 during a so-called treatment session in treating her 'uterine prolapse.’  (NOTE:  Detective S.  declared at the public trial on 06/06/2007, "She (Victoria Forester Courtland) told me that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time she saw him (me)." See FACT-51 below .

                 Regarding the credibility of V.C.'s statement, on 05/29/2007 at the open Court, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen informed the Court that "Ms. Courtland with her reports to KCSARC (King County Sex Assault Resource Center), which is not exactly consistent with that she has said during her interview." See FACT-53 below. ​

          On 09/07/2007 at the public Court, Victoria Forester Courtland disclosed the secret that she had contacted State's witness K.R. -- who was the and encouraged her "to come forward again".  See page 7 of V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statement).

​         In order to get $12,370.00 in restitution (see page 10 of V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statement) to cover up the cost of travel, baby care and to treat 3-year-old daughter's bad habit of biting nails, (See page 10 of V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statement)  Victoria Courtland made another baseless statement publicly that she and her daughter were my victims (see page 8 of  V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statement).
​

           THIS IS WHY TODAY -- 5 YEARS AFTER I ENDED THE SEVEN YEARS OF PRISON TIME I DON'T DESERVE -- I STILL DO NOT KNOW WHAT KIND OF  'SEX CRIME' I COMMITTED BECAUSE I DID NOT DO IT AS V.C. AND K.R. CLAIMED!
​

02
I DID NOT FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST
VICTORIA COURTLAND FOR HER HURT
MY GOOD REPUTATION, BUT FORGAVE
​HER UPON GOD'S TEACHING: 
​​TO FORGIVE!

​           Although Victoria Forester Courtland hurt me for her own gain, I forgave her upon God's teaching (If you forgive those who sin against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But if you refuse to forgive to forgive others, your Father will not forgive your sins." MATHEW 6:14-15) .

​            In 2015,  I published this online memoir with undeniable evidences on this website --  www.CharlieYCheng.com --  to forgive Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland who created non-existing ‘sex assault’ to hurt me.
         
            Two years later in 2017, I published following book "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness"  (ISBN 978-1-5136-2440-2) with undeniable evidence (see below) to forgive Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) who made false allegations against innocent Charlie ​Y. Cheng for her own gains (details see infra).
                关于我原谅V.C. 女士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。

03
AFTER I FORGAVE VICTORIA FORESTER
COURTLAND'S FALSE ACCUSATIONS,
IN 2019, V.C. GAVE UP HER 2007
RESTITUTION vs. INNOCENT ME.

         In June of 2015, Victoria F. Courtland read my website (this one) but she has NO objections to my evidences about her that being published.  On the contrary, in 2019, she voluntarily give up her 2007 restitution against me, the real victim of Washington State Superior Court case No. 06-1-05678-3 SEA.
​
        Since then, V.C. became a role model because she has the courage to correct her mistakes made 12 years ago.

              In February of 2019, I (Charlie Y. Cheng) received Prosecutor D. R.'s following letter in which he wrote: “Victoria Courtland has asked"  the King County Prosecutor's Office "to ask the court to stop restitution payment to her." 
       
​       (NOTE:  Regarding V.C.'s public statement asking for the restitution, see Victoria Forester Courtland's 09/07/2007 public statement).

           I was deeply touched by Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.")'s 2019 brave action -- she voluntarily surrendered her 2007 restitution she does not deserve. 

          I knew that it's GOD's gift because I forgave V.C.‘s fault according GOD's instructions. ("If you forgive those who sin against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But if you refuse to forgive to forgive others, your Father will not forgive your sins." MATHEW 6:14-15)

               I witnessed GOD's mercy and power again!         
​

04
WHAT'S DEFENSE ATTORNEY'S CONCLUSION? 
"MR. CHENG IS NOT GUILTY."​

            Before the 9/7/2007 sentencing hearing, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court for cause No.  06-1-05678-3 (my case) received dozens of opposing letters supporting of me because 'Mr. Cheng is not guilty' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) . 
​           当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。

             At the 09/07/2007 public Court, after Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a $12,372.00 restitution (V.C. claimed that she and her 3-year-old daughter was my 'victims' even though there was no evidence that I had been with her daughter alone).  Defense attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared publicly, "Mr. Cheng is a fine fine human being." (see below).

​
                Regarding Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation for making false allegations to the Seattle Police, on 06/05/2007 at the open court, Defense attorney Scott Engelhard told the open Court that it was "making false allegations against Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E below.)

05
WHAT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FACT FINDING?

             On 09/09/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for the non-existing sex crime ,  Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:  
​           "You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ...  the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see FACT-52 below)
​         在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)

06
WHAT ARE CHARLIE CHENG'S FEMALE PATIENTS'
RESPONSES TO THE INJUSTICE OVER YOU?

               After I was wrongfully convicted by the Jury which did not see my key evidence (my 04/13/1998 letter to K.R. to cancel her and her husband's treatment appointments because I was sexually assaulted by K.R. on 04/12/1998) , the trial Judge received 31 letters from American society to support me (see FACT-26 below).

            Kerri F.  wrote to Judge Nicole MacInnes :  "I saw Dr. Cheng over 20 times for treatment.  There was NEVER a time during my treatment visits with Dr. Cheng that I felt at all uncomfortable, threatened, or even hesitant in seeing him. ... I was never naked and there was NEVER any inappropriate touch or talk that transpired during any visit ... He was a very nice, polite, sweet person and treated me with utmost professional."   (see below) 

​    ​     Bonnie F.  wrote to Judge Nicole MacInnes :    "I received between 75 or 100 more treatment sessions AlONE with Mr. Cheng in his office over ten years,"  "and was never asked to remove any clothing or was never made to feel uncomfortable any way and especially not in any sexual way ever."

07
  DOES VICTORIA COURTLAND (“V.C.")
 WANT TO WRITE A BOOK ABOUT YOU?

          When V.C. (AKA:  "Victoria Forester") came to see me for her injury on 12/08/1998 (see FACT-H infra) , my ACU-VIBRA therapy for muscle rehabilitation was quite famous.  She had learned that my patient/clients including a King County Superior Court judge, prosecutors and a Hollywood movie star who lived in Los Angels.
          
           V.C. liked my Acu-vibra treatment.  She said, "I feel like on that level he is a healing force in my life (see FACT-27 below) .

          After couple of treatments, V.C. referred me to her sister Susan Forester Goodall and friend Ms. K. O'Connel.  V.C. described me as: "He gad been a trusted provider for seven years without ever touching me" (see FACT-28 infra);  "I had known him for so many years, seven years, without any inappropriate touch" (see FACT-29 infra),

           She told me she's a writer (see below court-approved transcript dated 12/01/2006).  (NOTE: Before creating the non-existing 2004 sex assault story against me, V.C. had published two fictions and a poem.  See FACT-2, infra.)

           Victoria Forester Courtland was going to write a book about my story, including my 'Acu-vibra' healing art and my 2001 victory over K.R.'s and her friends (B.C.'s, C.B's ) 1998 malicious retaliations.   

​           Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") said under oath, "I feel like on that level he (Charlie Cheng) is a healing force in my life." (see FACT-27 below)

  
​           V.C. also said publicly at the 06/05/2007 open Court that I "had been a trusted provider" of her "for seven years without ever touching" her (see  FACT-28 below).

         Victoria Forester Courtland repeated again that she had known me for "seven years", and during the "seven years", there was no "any inappropriate touch" from me. (See FACT-29 below.)

​08
 WHEN DID "VICTORIA COURTLAND"
​BEC0ME A PUBLIC FIGURE?

           "Victoria Courtland" (AKA: "V.C.", ​Victoria Forester Courtland, Victoria Forester)" became a public figure since she disclosed her name voluntarily at the public court on June 4, 2007, and being a State's witness at the open court against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng.

             NOTE:    The name of "Victoria Forester Courtland" ("V.C.") also had been disclosed to the public in 2007 by V.C.'s sister Susan and V.C.'s husband Matt at the ​Washington State Superior Court.
             Mr. Courtland said under oath, "Her name became Victoria Ann Forester Courtland." (see MATT-01 below)

09
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
TEACH CREATING WRITING IN  COLLEGE? 

              At the 6/5/2007 Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland declared publicly, "I'm an intelligent person" , and "I did teach creating writing."  (see FACT-1, below)

10
WHAT ARE VICTORIA FORESTTER
COURTLAND'S PUBLICATIONS
​BEING PUBLISHED BEFORE 2002?

               Victoria Forester Courtland told me that she was a writer.  At the trial on 06/05/2007 she told  the Court that she had published a poem and two fictions before 2007 (see FACT-2 below).

              According to Victoria Courtland's public statements, her book/fiction "THE VISIBLE WOMAN" which being published in 2000 or 2001 (see FACT-2 above) was about a man 'squeezing the flesh' of a woman's "breasts" (see FACT-2a below).

              NOTE:    According to Victoria Forester Courtland, her 2000-2001 fiction The Visible Woman which was "about women experiencing night terrors" (see above transcript, lines 24-25) and 'domestic violence' (see above transcript lines 7-8), i.e., before 2001, V.C. had known that the act that this man grabbing a woman's breasts was 'domestic violence."

11
HOW DID V.C.'s HUSBAND INTRODUCE
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND TO THE PUBLIC?

           On 06/05/2007 at the public Court, Mr. Courtland talked about her wife Victoria Forester Courtland as: "Typically she is not afraid to her mind." (See the lower part in MATT-08 below).

          NOTE:    According to Mr. Courtland's above public statement, his wife "V.C." is a person who "is not afraid to speak her mind."  V.C. (who claimed that she's being sexually assaulted by me in a 2004 treatment session for her 'uterine  prolapse') didn't make a report to the police in 2004, but rather waited until June 2006.

12

WHAT'S THE JUDGE'S OPINION REGARDING
V.C.'S BASELESS CLAIM THAT SHE "HAD
​POSTPARTUM  DEPRESSION"?

             At the open Court on 09/07/2007,  V.C. asked the Washington State Superior Court for a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her expense of travel, child care and to give a treatment to stop her 3-years-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6, infra), on 09/07/2007, V.C. made a baseless 'rape' claim to the public as: "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).

​             Regarding the so-called diagnoses, Judge N. M. said at her court before, "We have no evidence of it." (Citing page 178 of court's 06/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below). 

13
DID V.C. MAKE A FALSE CLAIM PUBLICLY
THAT HER 3-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER 
"HAD BEEN A VICTIM" OF YOU?

              On September 7th of 2007 at the Washington State Superior Court,  inorder to get a $12,372 of restitution V.C. claimed (via a letter being read to the public), "In the months preceding the the trial I was so fearful of facing the perpetrator again that I began biting my nails. ... my three year old daughter  was deeply affected by my anxiety  modeled my biting habit, and has not been able to stop herself.  I am now seeking treatment for her nervousness as she too has been a victim of this crime. ... I want the court to order Charlie Cheng to pay restitution ... I spent approximately $11,372 ... and anticipate to spend another thousand ... "  (quoting V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statements.  See infra "FACT-6").
​
          NOTE:  I have no clue why Mrs. V.C. would claim publicly that her 3-year-old daughter "has been a victim" of me because I never contacted the baby girl (during V.C.'s 2004 visit, her daughter was only 3-month old).  According to V.C.'s husband's 06/05/2007 public statement under oath,  during V.C.'s 2004 visit, he had been taking care their 3-months-old daguthrer (see evidence:  Mr. Courtland's Statement about V.C.'s 2004 visit).
​

10
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND SAID,
"I DO LIKE CREATING STORIES."

                At the trial on  06/05/2007, she declared publicly, "I do like creating stories."  (see below) 
              在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。

NOTE：
​Victoria Forester Courtland's passion of 'creating stories" 
has been documented in the Court's 09/07/2007 official transcript.

11
V.C.'S "MOTIVATION FOR MAKING FALSE
ALLEGATIONS AGAINST MR. CHENG". 
V.C. :  "I BECAME SO DEPRESSED.'

            Victoria Forester Coourtland stated 09/07/2007,  "After reporting Charlie Cheng to the Seattle Police, I became so depressed." (See lines 12-13).

           Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court,  “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against  Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E below)

09
PROSECUTOR J. TOLD THE COURT
THAT VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
STATEMENTS WERE INCONSISTENT.

            Regarding Dr. Courtland's stories, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen pointed out:
​           "Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews.  There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
​
          关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）

According to the official transcripts,
there being many V.C.'s inconsistent
statements.  Below are examples:

                 On 9/7/2007 at the sentence court, V.C. disclosed the secret that she actually known the State's witness K.R. -- V.C. declared publicly, "I met previous victims to come forward again" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See supra "FACT-C", or see V.C.'s full statement of 09/07/2007) .      NOTE:  It was contracted to what V.C. testified at the 6/5/2007 court,  where V.C. denied this crucial fact under oath that she was knowing K.R. (See infra "FACT-3" and “FACT-4”, the court's transcript)

             On another side under oath, Dr. Courtland would give a contrary story that she did "not' know Kathryn R.  (see fact 4 below).

           Mrs. Courtland's other inconsistent stories (e.g., regarding whether she really talked with an acupuncture about the non-existing alleged 2004 assault, on 12/21/2006 she told the Prosecutor that the acupuncturist was "Kimberly Hughes"; then, at the 2007 trial, she changed to "Priscilla Xu"), please see infra Q & A Section.
         有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。

NOTE: 
V.C.'s husband, Mr. Courtland's statement was that
Mrs. Courtland told him about the alleged 2004
touching after they back to the East Coast
(See FACT-14 in "Q 28" infra).

        Regarding Victoria Forester's motivation, one side, at the 6/5/2007 open court, she said under oath, "we didn't need money” (see FACT-5 below).​   
        有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。

​            On another side, at the 9/7/2007 Court, Dr. Courtland would make a 180-degree turn by asking a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her trip and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6 below).
         另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).

          Note:  even if Victoria Forester Courtland claimed that her daughter "has been a victim" of mine (see above lines 16-17 on FACT-6), 98% of her $12,372.00 of restitution demand was NOT granted by the Washington State Superior Court (supra, or see V.C.'s full statement of 09/07/2007).
         值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.​

          At the 2007 public trial, Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) presented to the Jury a non-existing 'fact' under oath that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second treatment session' in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
          In order to convince the Jury to believe the story,  Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below).  It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
          Notably,  neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims. 

12
V.C. CREATED A FICTION THAT I SEXUALLY
ASSAULTED HER IN A TREATMENT SESSION
FOR HER UTERINE PROLAPSE

                    In 2007, at the Washington State Superior Court, Mrs. Victoria Courtland made a false statement under oath to the public that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second' session of treating her uterine prolapse in December of 2004!
                    I don't treat uterine prolapse! 
                    This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below). 
                       V.C.在宣誓下谎称她在2004年12月从美国东部飞到西雅图找我治疗子宫下垂。我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ ！有关我曾经治疗的肌肉痛，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，从来没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。

13
DETECTIVE MS. STRANGELAND
DISPROVED V.C.'S CLAIM

          Regarding the issue of whether Dr. Courtland was seeing me in 2004 for treating her 'uterine prolapse," at the 6/7/2007 trial court, Seattle Police Detective Stangeland disclosed two secrets to the public:  (1) Ms. Courtland was not see me for uterine prolapse, and (2) 'she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time' she saw me in 2004 (see below).

          At the 2007 trial, under oath Dr. Courtland created a story that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her 'second' treatment session for her uterine prolapse in December, 2004.
           在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。

         Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
​         (A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
         (B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
         关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】；   但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。

At the 2007 trial, when V.C. was asked why did she wait 18-months long to make the alleged event?  She gave two reasons
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her.  (See FACT-G, infra)

                 On 06/13/2019, Prosecutor D. I. R. emailed me: "restitution payments to VC were terminated per attached order“ (see image FACT-A below). 
​          在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。

             Below (FACT-B) is Prosecutor D. R.'s 6/13/2019 attachment, the "AGREED AMENDMENT TO ORDER SETTING RESTITUTION Dated 12/18/2007, TERMINATING PAYMENT TO V.C. (DOB ...)” signed by Judge Michael Ryan on 2/25/2019.   
            他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。

       ​  Above Superior Court's 2/25/2019 Order was prepared by the Prosecutor upon Dr. Courtland's request, it states, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments.  Therefore, restitution payment to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (see above FACT-B ) 
         最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见上面FACT-B)。

​Unfinished ... More  coming soon!     
​网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
​
​

​Q 1:     Have you had a fair trial?  你有没有受到公平的审判？

        No.  I didn't have a fair trial.  For example, my constitution right to have my own witness had been deprived by the trial Court (see Attorney Scott J. Engelhard's email dated 6/1/2007, below)    
     我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。

​Q 2：  What's your former female patients' response after you being convicted?

          After I was wrongfully convicted, Judge Nicole Macinnes received many of opposing letters from my former female patients (see FACT-26 below).  
          在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。

             For example, Christine E. D., health care provider, wrote to the Judge, "I believe that allegations against Dr. Cheng must be invented for whatever reason by the two women who made them ... How could be convicted on the basis of two former patients who were seen by him decades apart? ... Please not allow a miscarriage of justice!"  

             Q 3:     Is it true that Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud (she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) met you in person at King  County Jail, willing to assist your appeal?

           That's true.  
​
       当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。

​Q 4:    On 6/5/2007, V.C. made a public claim that in December of 2004 you touched her sex organ to  treat her uterine prolapse which was herr reason she saw you.  Have you touch V.C.'s sex organ as a treatment? 

                    Not All!  Actually, V.C. knew the fact that my treatment does not touch sex organs. (see V.C.'s "Patient's Consent Form" dated 07/02/2002 in FACT_P below)

Q 5:   What's the Count One charge against you?
​
         The Count One charge was K.R.'s 1998 allegations of which the Department of Health has found any professional misconduct on my side (details see Kathy R.)

​Q 6：    After the appellate lawyer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women,"   why would you forgive them?   为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？

          I forgive "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.”   (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
​                  之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。

Q 7：   How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?

           AI had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison. 
​       I'd like to give special thanks to:  David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke,  Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers,  Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon,  Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke,  Dennis Able,  Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier,  Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.   

Q 8：     Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?
             本冤案实情在网上公布后，你会受到生命威胁吗？

                Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing bias and racialism！   是存在这种危险性，因为偏见和种族主义的存在！

Q 9：     Why would Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) make false claims to hurt you?
              为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？

​               Because of our conflict happened in the end of V.C.'s third visit -- I reject her demand for an exclusive right to write my story because Prof. Alex Maxwell (my English editor for my three books in English) also wanted to write my story.  And, I did no allow V.C. to use the 2000-01 photo which showing she was shaking hands with me, in her book.

              In the end of the third visit, Victoria Forester Courtland left my office very angry. 

​Q 10:     What's V.C.'s recollection about the said second treatment session for her uterine prolapse?

             She insisted that I treated her uterine prolapse in her seconded treatment session on 12/17/2007. And, she left my office without fair (see the transcript below).

 11:       Is it true that on 11/13/2001, the Department of Health (DOH) found that you were not guilty for K.R.'s 1998 complaint (the Count One charge against you in the 2006) ?
           2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？

           A10:    Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.

​Unfinished ... More  coming soon!     网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！

​Q 12:   When was the first time you first met Victoria Forester-Coutland?

                 I knew Victoria Forester-Courtland since 1998.  That time her name was "Victoria Forester".   She was referred to me by her friend "Mitch" (see below), a psychologist who's a years-long client of me, because Victoria Forester felt down from a ladder and injured herself during a work. 

​Q 13:   Was December of 2004 the last time V.C.  being treated by you?
​
           ​  Mrs. Courtland accused that I gave her treatment in December of 2004.  This is a lie!  According  to the  record,  her last teimentt day was July 2nd of 2002.  That time her name was not "Courtland" but "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester (see below).​  This is my evidence to prove the crucial fact that I did not treat V.C.'s uterine prolapse in her December-2004 visit.
​

Q 14:    Is it true that on 06/07/2006 Victoria Forester Courtland told Detective Stangeland she had pictures taken with you,               but at the 06/05/2007 trial, she denied under oath?

             Yes, It's true! 

             Regarding whether V.C. had the copy of photography showing she and me together, V.C. had two opposite versions:
On June 7 of 2006, she told the Detective she had the picture (see FACT-Q below);

       
                    However, on June 7 of 2006, at the trial V.C. denied under oath (see FACT-R below);

 Where is the "Defendant's Exhibit Number 10"? 
See FACT-32 in my sub-web, "TIMELINE".

Q 15:     At the trial,  Victoria Forester Courtland told the Jury that the reason she didn't see any physicians at the East Coast (where she lives) for her painful 'uterine prolapse', but rather waiting 3 more months to fly to Seattle (the West Coast) to see you, because she and you 'always' have a 'doctor and patient' relationship'.  Do you and Dr. Courtland always have a doctor and patient relationship as she claimed?
​
             ​​  No.
​

Q 16:    Mrs. Courtland claimed that she was 'sex assaulted' by you in 2004.  Why she did not report to the Police in 2004, but waited to June of 2006?

          Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
        (1)  "I am afraid that ... there would be a  retribution for calling the police"; and
        (2)  "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)

               Note:   During the deposition held by Defense attorney Scott Engelhard and Prosecutor Heather Jensen on 12/01/2006, V.C. did not made above claim that the reason she was being waiting for 18 months long to call Seattle Police because she had "great fear" that I would "kill" her.
​
​

​Q 17:    V.C. claimed that in December of 2004 she saw you three times for treating her uterine prolapse, but she was not able to provide a diagnosis to prove her claim. What else she provided to the trial court as her exhibit to support her claim against you?

            At  the 2007 trial, the Prosecutor submitted V.C.'s 2-page Consolidated Statement for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005 (see "FACT-K" below) as their evidence.  And, this is the only physical evidence she had to support her claims.
​
           On the top line of the V.C.'s bank statement (below), it documented the fact that V.C. received 2-page Consolidated Statement on 02/11/2005, which were almost 14-months before she made the false report to the SPD on 06/06/2006. 

​Q 18:    When was V.C.'s first visit of you in December of 2004? 

             According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1138,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s first visit was 12/15/2004 (see FACT_L below),

​
​Q 19:    When was V.C.'s second visit of you in December of 2004? 

             According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1139,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s second visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_M below),

​
​Q 20:    When was V.C.'s third visit of you in December of 2004? 

                         According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1140,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s third visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_N below),.

​Q 21:    Did V.C. submit above-mentioned her three December-2004 checks to the trial court as her evidence to support her claim against you? 

                        No.  V.C. did NOT! 

                      Because she only give the copy of her bank's "Consolidated Statement from 12/9/2004 to 1/10/2005" (see supra “FACT_K") but omitted above-mentioned her three checks (No. 1138, 1139 & 1140) which are crucial evidence to prove I was innocent for V.C.'s baseless claim, that's why my lawyer Mr. Engelhard had to issue a subpoena to her bank in the East Coast (see "FACT_O", infra).

​
Q 21:    At the 2007 trial, Victoria Forester Courtland claimed under oath that you touched her sex organ.  Is that part of your  treatment?

                 No such things happened. The nature of my treatment had been documented in the Patient's Consent form (see FACT-P below).

​Q 22:    Did accusers K.R. and V.C. proved their accusations against you?

          Not all! 
          The prosecution did not prove the following two crucial facts: 
             (1) I had been with accuser K.R. (count one accuser) during the alleged incident time -- after 7:00 p.m. on 04/12/1998, the Easter Sunday. (Note: K.R. fabricated a fact that she'd been sexually touched by me after 7:00 p.m. before 8:15 p.m.  However, I had been with Mr. Taoyuan Wang's wife and two children after 6:30 p.m. in my office. see K.R.);
​             (2) I 'treated' V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004 (Note: V.C. fabricated a fact that I inserted my finger into her vagina treating her uterine prolapse in her second session.  (Note:  V.C. claimed that 4 days later, after the alleged second treatment, her father and husband drove her came out again for a third treatment, but she did NOT ask these two men to stay with her inside of my clinic.  Details? see infra court transcripts.) 
​

Q 23:    Have you appealed?

            On my sentence day, September 7th of 2007,  my appellate attorney was presented. 
​           I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014). 
           I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.  

Q 24: Had the Jury heard your testimony in your own English? 

          No.              
          Upon my defense attorney's request, my entire testimony at the 2007 trial was made in Mandarin Chinese, which was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter to translate Mandarin to English.  In  another word, the Jury only heard second hand testimony of mine. 

Q 25:   Who was your court-appointed interpreter? 

              Marisa Hsu was my first court-appointed interpreter (see FACT-T, below). 

Q 26:   Did Marisa Hsu translate your entire Mandarin testimony to the Jury in appropriate English? 

          Some of her translations are appropriate but some are not because Mrs. Hsu could not follow up what I had said to the Jury in my Mandarin Chinese, and she only understood part of my words in Maderin. (See FACT-U, below).

Q 27:   Were you satisfied with Marisa Hsu's translation? 

          No!
          Because she added a non-existing fact that I used other method 'touched' female's breasts (see FACT-V below).  Touching female's breasts  is element of crime; As result, I was being wrongfully charged and sentenced.

Q 28:   When and where did V.C. tell her husband about the non-existing '2004 touching'? 

          When was the first time V.C. told her husband about the non-existing December-2004 sex assault, it's an important factor to determine whether Victoria Forester Courtland's accusation was true or false.

           V.C.'s sworn statement at the open court was: "I choice talk to him as soon after it happened as I could." (See supra VERSION-3).  I.e., V.C. told her husband Matt when Matt was in Seattle when they stayed with her sister Susan's house.

          However, according to Mr.'s Courtland's sworn statement below (FACT-14) V.C. did NOT telld him the non-existing '2004 touching' in Seattle.  Mr. Courtland sait that he was  informed  when they back to their home in the East Coast (See FACT-14 below). 

Q 29:   Mrs. Courland asked a restitution of $12,372 intal.  Had it been granted by the Court? 

           V.C.'s goal for the trial was to get "approximately $11,372, and anticipate spending at least another thousant" (see lines 4-11 in FACT-W below).

          Unfortunately, 98 % of the restitution money Mrs. Courtland asked  was not being proved by the Court.  Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a 5-digit of restitution but was granted for 3-digit restitution. (See the 2-page Court's Order dated 12/13/2007 in FACT-W below).

Q 30:    Why didn't Victoria Forester Courtland tell her husband about the alleged 'second treatment session' as soon as it                   happened, but rather wait weeks -- until they flew back to their home in the East Coast? 

                        At the open court, V.C. told the Jury that because she and her husband didn't have their own car and they didn't have a lot of private time (see FACT-15 below).

Q 31:      V.C. told the Jury that the purpose she called the KCSARC (King County Sex Assault Resource Center) in June of 2015 was to find out if she should report you to the police.  In 2015, the KCSARC's manager Megan Allen had encouraged her to call the police. Why didn't Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland make a report to the Police in 2015 ? 

                        Mrs. Courtland's reason was, as she said, "I was afraid that Dr. Cheng would be retribution for calling the police" (see "FACT-16" below).   

statement of susan forester goodall (V.C.'s sister)

Victoria Courtland became a role model 
since she surrendered the 2007
restitution she does not deserve!

statement of Matthew courtland (V.C.'s husband)

In order to share GOD's Mercy,
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under
​injustice (as I'd suffered), 
I disclosed my real disaster case with
undeniable evidence in this webside,
​
TELLING THE TRUTH.
​
Hopefully, this online memoir will be an
useful reference for law students, justice
workers and all American families.
​为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。
​

Under construction ...  more coming soon  
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com