CHARLIEYCHENG.COM美国冤案纪实TELLING THE TRUTH

Why Innocent Prisoner, Charlie Y. Cheng, Would Forgive Those Who
Fabricated Non-existent Sex Crimes Against Him For Their Own Gains?

为什么蒙冤被打入美国大牢‘七年’的笔者，
会原谅那些谎编 ‘性侵’ 来恶意陷害我的人?

Unfinished More coming soon ...

I, Charlie Y. Cheng, the victim of famous 2007's wrongful conviction (No. 06-01-05678-3 WA) of which was made upon the false accusations of K.R. (who 'lent' a $10,000.00 to her female friends C.N. & B.C. be the State's witnesses but both of them were impeached at a pretrial hearing, see infra) and V.C. (who provided contrary facts under oath: one side she denied she was knowing state witness K.R. ; On another side, she declared that she met K.R. and encouraged her "to come forward again."  infra).

After the 2007 wrongful conviction, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court received dozens of opposing letters (infra) in support of Charlie Y. Cheng, the author of “50 Q & A of Tuina” (a famous Chinese-medicine book published in Hong Kong, 1982), who was being wrongly labeled as a 'sex offender' even though he had NOT been with the accusers during their alleged -- the so-called -- crime time periods (infra).

Before the 2007 wrongful conviction, I had NO criminal history.

When I was being incarcerated at the Airway Heights Corrections (AHCC), I was an unique innocent prisoner because I received Sen. Patty Murray's e-invitation dated 10/12/2009 to join a luncheon with Vice President Joe Biden on 11/16/2009 in Seattle (the letter copy see infra).

Now, I am a unique post-prisoner, because I am the only so-called 'sex offender' who would receive the Washington Superior Court's Order saying that the accuser (V.C.), for uncertain reasons, asked the Court to terminate her 2007 restitution against me (infra). (NOTE:  V.C. told the Jury under oath that she didn't need money, later asked -- but was not proved by -- the Court for a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her cost and to treat her 3-year old daughter's biting-nail habit. Aaccording to V.C.'s 9/7/2007 declaration at the open court, her baby daughter "was the victim" of me.  On 12/18/2007, the Court granted $90 to V.C. )

In order to encourage our law students and justice workers to understand their responsibility to protect our society by acting upon the law; And, to let our youth to know the importance to forgive, I built up this website in 2015 after being released from the prison.

Although my 'American dream‘ and my family have been seriously impacted by the irreparable injury caused by the injustice and racialism, I did not fall down. Because I chose to obey God's teaching, to forgive those who created false accusations against me for their own gains (see infra).

In 2017, I disclosed my real story with undeniable evidence in my new memoir, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" (AKA: "FORGIVENESS", see image below) .   Hopefully, this valuable memoir, which is based upon fact, will be an useful reference book for the law students, justice workers, social workers, parents and the law enforcement.

我是著名的美国华盛顿州2007年冤案（No. 06-01-05678-3 WA）的受害者，在受到诬告者 "K.R." （她借钱给女朋友C.N. 和 B.C.为她作伪证，但这两位女子都法庭免除证人资格）和 “V.C.” （她宣誓从不认识检方证人K.R., 但又在法庭上公开宣称，是她怂恿K.R.再次出面）的报复陷害之前，我没有犯罪史。
我是香港1982年出版的畅销中医书《医疗推拿50问》的作者。当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。
我也是一位很特殊的‘犯罪分子’。在被囚禁在美国大牢服刑时，就收到过美国联邦参议员帕蒂-玛瑞热情的邀请函、请我同她一起参加2009年11月16日同美国副总统拜登在西雅图的餐会（原件照片，见本网页中间处）。出狱后，我又收到了华盛顿州最高法院的2019年2月25日批件、说是批准了V.C.要求法院终止她2007年向我要求惩罚金的诉求。（批件没有提原因。我只知道，她曾请求法官让我付给她$12,372.00惩罚金、用来赔偿她的差旅费和治疗她三岁女儿咬手指头的坏毛病 -- V.C.公开宣称，从她女儿模仿了她咬手指头的习惯上说，她女儿也是我的受害者，但是她的$12,372.00 诉求被拒绝，只得到90美元。）
为了让美国法学院学生明白自己的职责是为维护美国宪法的正义；为了避免其他无辜者会重复我的遭遇，在我出狱的2014年，就开始了编辑这个网站。虽然种族主义和不公平的制度破灭了我的<美国梦>，也给我的家庭造成了无可弥补的巨大伤害，但我并没有倒下去；因为，我遵循了上帝的教导去饶恕这些为个人利益所得、而伤害我的人。在2017年，我出版了这本、以无可驳倒的证据为基础的新回忆录《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》（见下图）。

希望我这本2017年出版的回忆录，可成为法学院学生、司法人员、执法人员、社会工作者和父母们的参考资料。

Click the images for details. 请点击图片看更多内容。

1. After the 2007 wrongful conviction, I was informed by my appeallate attorney who reviewed the complete court records: "You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ..."
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是无辜的，你受到了两位不诚实女子的栽赃...审判庭法官在本案处理上做错了。”

Unfinished ... More coming soon!

2. Defense attorney Scott. J. Engelhard Declared, "Mr. Cheng is not quilty."
在法庭上，被告律师向陪审团宣告：“鄭先生是无罪的。”（下面是华州最高法院的庭审记录）

According to the record, Attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared that Charlie Y. Cheng "is a fine, fine human being."
The defense lawyer found: "Mr. Cheng is not guilty" for the 2007 accusation, and he"is innocent" man (below).

3. Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, On June 1, 2007, found a constitutional issue regarding to my case, "Judge MacInners saying that she will NOT allow us to call any of your female clients as witness, I think is a bad ruling by her. and it may be a good ground to get a new trial if you are convicted." (See image below.)
我的辩护律师在2007年6月1日，发现法官的一个严重错误（不许我的女病人为我作证属违宪）后、写给我：“我认为这是她的错误。万一你被判刑，可用法官的这错误来要求重审。”

4. At the public hearing, on 5/29/2007, I heard that a Prosecuting Attorney Ms. Jensen who represented the accusers, told the trial Judge, "Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See the court transcript below.)

在2007年5月29日的公开听证会上，我听到了女检查官Jensen告诉法官：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲，与她向KCSARC 机构的报案所称，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面的法庭记录。）

1. After the 6/13/2007 Conviction, Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud (now "Justice Sheryl Gordon MaCloud") met me in person at King County Jail, willing to assist my appeal.
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。

Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud was referred to Mr. Cheng by Scott J. Engelhard, trial attorney. Her Honor expressed her willing to help Mr. Cheng's appeal of the 6/13/2007 conviction (click here to see the evidence).
在被误判后，著名的上诉律师Sheryl G. MaCloud（她现在是华州最高法院的大法官）专门到监狱探视本网主，并表示要接我的案子、替我上诉 (点击此处看证据）。

2. After I was wrongfully convicted, my former patients asked Judge Nicole Macinnes: "Please do not llow a miscarriage of justice"
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。

After the conviction, before the sentence hearing, Hon. Nicole MacInnes, the trial judge received 30+ letters from the public in
support Charlie Y. Cheng and in opposing the unfair trial. The letter below is one of them, in which Christine D. wrote: "I have always
been grateful to Dr. Daniel Schiff for referring me to Dr. Cheng;" "Dr. Cheng is a highly professional, very business-like, yet caring health
provider. ... Please do not allow a miscarriage of justice." More see sub-page: 'WHO IS CHARLIE Y. CHENG?" ( or click image below).

Unfinished ... More coming soon!

3. Regarding Mrs. Courtland's motivation Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against Mr. Cheng."

4. Mrs. Courtland (Victoria Forester) Made Contradictory Statements Under Oath.
According to the Court's transcript dated 9/7/2007, at a Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland (VC) disclosed a secret that before the 2007 trial, she actually "met" K.R., the State's another witness/accuser, and she encouraged K R. ”to come forward again" (see the image below, Fig. 174 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS)."
Notably, V.C.'s above declaration being contradicted to her prior statement made at the Washington State Superior Court under oath, 6/5/2007 (see Fig. 173 at page 159 of the FORGIVENESS, below).

上图是我英文回忆录 “FORGIVENESS：An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony” （要原谅：一个无辜囚犯的证词）
的第159页。里面的173图是诬陷我的VC在法庭上坦承认她见过检方的另一个证人，并且怂恿她到法庭作证
来反对我；174图，是VC在法庭上公开宣誓后称，她从来不认识检方的这个证人。(前后矛盾！）

5. When I was a prisoner (for an alleged sex crime but I had not commited), I was invited to meet Vice President Joe Biden (see below)

我在美国的囚犯身份，很奇葩：除了主审法官收到来自社会的30多封反对她错判的来信；以及华盛顿州最高上诉
法院的现任大法官 Sheryl G. McCloud（当时她是著名的上诉律师）亲自到监狱见我，表示要替我上诉之外；当我在
监狱服刑期，我还收到美国参议员帕蒂-莫瑞的邀请信，请我同当时的美国副总统拜登先生共进午餐（请见下面）。

Q1： After the appellate layer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women," why would you forgive them?
为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？

I forgave "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").

之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯”
此原因，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。

Q2： How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?

I had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison. I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.

Q3： Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exploed this injustice case against him?
本冤案实情在网上公布后，当事人（鄭志愚）是否会受到生命威胁？

Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing racialism！是存在这种危险性，因为种族主义的存在！

K1： Isn't it true that on 4/13/1998, you wrote a certified letter to Kathy (K.R.) against her improper sex behavior over you on 4/12/1998? Isn't it true that in that letter, you canceled Kathy's 4/16/1998 treatment session and her husband's 4/17/1998 treatment session because of K.R.'s improper sexual behavior on 4/12/1998 ?

你在1998年4月13日是否寄过给Kathy (K.C.)一封挂号信、谴责了她4月12日对你不当的性侵犯行为？是否因为她对你有不良的性行为，而让你取消了她1998年4月16日、和他先生4月17日的治疗预约？

Yes, that's true. The content of my 4/13/1998 certified letter is being published on page 40-42 of my memoir, "FORGIVENESS“ (see image 'KR-1', below).

I wrote her, "This letter is explain [to] you why I left message on your answering machine last night to cancel your next appointment on 04/16/98. I said I don't feel comfortable to continue to give your treatment because I feel yur romance just like a harassment according to the Chinese way ... By the way, please infor[m] Tom, his appointment on 04/17/1998 will be cancel[led] too ... You are the person should tellhime the reasons if he asks ..." (infra).

这是千真万确。关于我1998年4月13日给Kathy挂号信的内容（提到我取消她4月16日和她先生的17日治疗预约，是因为她在4月12日下午治疗结束给我的法式接吻是我不能接受的，因我是一位基督徒，按照我们华人的传统观点，她这种行为属于性骚扰，等等）。该信的复印件我已经在回忆录《要饶恕》的第40-42页中刊出（请见下图）。

K2： Isn't it true that at the open trial, Kathy admitted the fact that she did receive your 4/13/1998 certified letter against her?
K.R. 有没有收到你4/13/1998寄给她的这封关于反对她4/12/1998对你不良性行为的挂号信？

Yes, K.R. had received the 4/13/1998 certified letter and its copy. At the 6/4/2007 trial, K.R. admitted the fact that she did receive my certified letter on "Tuesday" and a copy of the letter on "Wednesday". See the upper left part of above image (KR-1).

K.R.在2007年6月4日的法庭上，承认了她收到过我1998年4月13日给她的挂号信（见上图 KR-1的左上角）。

K3： Isn't it true that K.R.'s husband (now "Ex.") signed the USPS Return Receipt card on 4/16/1998?
是否K.R.的前夫在1998年4月16日签收了你反对她太太性骚乱你的挂号信？

Yes, K.R.'s husband Tom went to the USPS to pick up my certified mail to Kathy.
On 4/13/1998, Monday, I sent the original letter to Kathy (K.R.) with certified mail # 383 184 199 (see Fig. 23 on page 42 of "FORGIVENESS", below).
On the next day, 4/14/1998, Tuesday, I found that I did not pay for Return Receipt Service when I sent out the original one on Monday. So, on April 14 (Tuesday), I sent the copy of my 4/13/1998 letter to Kathy (K.R.) again by another certified mail with USPS Return Receipt service -- I paid an extra $1.10 'return receipt shipping' fee for it (see below Fig. 34 on page 42 of the memoir).
Notably, my second certified mail (P 383 184 198) was sen to "Mrs. Kathy P" ("P" was Kathy's ex-husband's last name) on April 14, 1998. Kathy did not pick up but her ex-husband Tom P. did. And, Tom signed the return receipt on April 16 of 1998 (see Fig. 35 on page 43 of my memoir, below).

K4: Isn't it true that K.R.'s 1998 allegations against you happend a month later after receiving of your 4/13/1998 confrontation letter against her 4/12/1998 sex harassment over you? Isn't it true that the date Department of Health (DOH) received K.R.'s story (dated 5/13/1998) against you was on 5/28/1998?
这是真的吗？检方证人K.R.是在收到你1998年4月13日挂号信反对她4月12日对你的性骚扰后的五周才向卫生厅编故事？

Yes. The DOH received the complaint of K.R. (AKA: "Kathy P") on 5/26/1998 which was 5 weeks after receiving of my 4/13/1998 certified letter against V.C.'s 4/12/1998 sex harassment over me. (See image KR-3 below).
这是千真万确，卫生厅是在1998年5月26日才收到K.R.编的、反对我的故事 -- 这已经是在她收到我4月13日寄出、反对她4月12日性骚扰我的挂号信的第五个星期了（请见下面的证据, KR-3图）。

K5: Isn't it true that on May 31, 2007, state witness K.R. told the Jury under oath, "I don't know how the case got to the Seattle Police Department"? Isn't it true that under oath she denied she called the Police？
是否在2007年5月31日的庭审中，检方证人 K.R. 告诉陪审团，她不知道为什么她给卫生厅写信的事会传到西雅图警方？她是否说过，她从没有因此事而打电话给警方？

Yes. That's true. Below (image KR-4) is K.R.'s statement made at the open court on May 31, 2007.
在2007年5月31日的庭审中，检方证人K.R.告诉陪审团陪审团和检察官：她不知道为何有关她给卫生厅写信讲我的坏话会传到警方那里，因为她从来没有给西雅图警察局打过电话（报告此事）。下面KR-4是她在法庭上的证词：

K6: Isn't it true that on 11/13/2001, Hon. Eric B. Schward, Health Law Judge signed DOH's "Stipulated Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Agreed Order" with you? Isn't it true that the Agreed Order documented the fact of Kathy (K.C.) as: "Patient A (K.R.) made a false complaint against Respondent (Charlie Cheng) in retaliatiofor his refust to continue treatng her"?
在2001年11月13日，是否法官签署了卫生厅同你签署了关于处理K.R.指控的协议？在那份协议书中，关于K.R. (Kathy)的行为是这样记载的：“病人A（K.R.) 编造了谎言来反对被告（你），因为被告拒绝再给她继续治疗?"

Yes. The fact regarding K.C.'s retaliation by sending a complaint letter to the DOH, has been documented in the DOH's 11/13/2001 Agreed Order as: "Patient A (K.R.) made a false complaint agains Respondent （me) in retaliation for his refust to continue treating her." (see inmage KR-5 below).

Unfinished ... More coming soon!

V1： Isn't it true that Vitoria Forester Courtland created a non-existing fact that she was sexually assaulted by you during the-said second session in treating her 'uterine prolapse'? And, isn't it true that she told the Jury that after the second session, she then came over again for a third treatment session?
V.C.是否编了故事，称你在第二次治疗她‘子宫下垂’时骚扰她。之后，她又来第三次？

Unfinished. More coming soon ...

V2： At the open court on 6/5/2007, why would Mr. Engelhard tell the trial Judge, "there is absolutely no basis for her claim of uterine prolapse" ?
为什么在2007年6月5日的公开法庭上，辩护律师告诉法官：“检方证人V.C.‘的子宫下垂故事是虚构的？

At the 6/6/2007 trial, Detective Stangeland disproved V.C.'s claim that I treated Mrs. Courtland's uterine prolapse. She disclosed this secret to the Jury, "She (V.C.) told me that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time she saw him (me)." See image below, page 70 of the King County Superior Court official transcript dated June 6, 2007.

因为V.C.在2007年12月见我时，不是为治疗所谓的她患有 "子宫下垂" 。关于这个事实的秘密，警探 S.是在2007年6月6日向陪审团透露的。她说：“她（V.C.）没有过这治疗。她告诉过我，在他们见面的那段时间，她没有被诊断过患有子宫下垂。“（请见下面法庭的庭审记录）

V4： Isn't it true that one side, Victoria Courtland (V.C.) told the Court she "didn't need money", but on another side she asked the Court for a $12,372.00 of restitution?
是不是真有这样的事：V.C. 一方面在法庭上说她不需要钱；但在另一方面，她又向法庭要$12,372 赔偿金？法官批准她的诉求没？

Yes， That's true.
According to the King County Superior Court's records, at the 6/5/2007 Court, V.C. declared, "we didn't need money" (see Fig. 1 below)

At the 9/7/2007 Court, V.C. created a 'fact' that her 3-year old daughter 'had been a victim' of mine; then asked the Court to order me to pay her a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her travel expenses, including to treat her daughter's biting-nail habit (see Fig. 2 below).

下面是检方证人 V.C.声称她三岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”、要求法官让我付她惩罚金$12,372.00的法庭记录。

V5： Isn't it true that V.C.'s petition for the $12,372.00 was not being granted by the Court?
这是真的吗，法院没有批准V.C.要 $12,372.00的诉求？

That's true. Even if Victoria Forester-Court claimed that her 3-year-old daughter was "the victim" of mine, the Court did NOT issue an order to force me to pay the $12,372.00 as Victoria Forester-Courtland asked for.

这是真的。尽管检方证人V.C.向法庭要$12,372.00，并且声称她3岁半的女儿是我的 “受害者”，法庭也没批准她的诉求（根本没让我付V.C. 这笔她梦想要的惩罚金）。

V6： Isn't it true that after V.C.'s $12,372 restitution against you being denied by the Court on 12/18/2007, 12 years later, in February of 2019, V.C. asked the Court to terminate her 2007 restitution request?
在检方证人V.C. 2007年12月18日要求我付她$12,372惩罚金被法庭拒绝后的12年，于2019年2月，她要求法庭终止她2007年的惩罚金诉求，这是真的吗？

Yes, on June 13 of 2019, I received a e-copy of a Court's Order from King County Prosecutors Office signed by Judge Michael Ryan on February 25, 2019. The Order stated, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments. Therefore, restitution payments to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (See Fig. 3 below).

是的。在2019年6月13日，我收到了下面这张（Fig. 3）法官Michael Ryan 在2019年2月25日签署的、同意检方证人V.C.不再要求让我付她惩罚金的文件。

V7： Isn't it true that regarding the-said second treatment in December of 2004, Victoria
Forester-Courtland (V.C.) and her husband provided contradicted statements under oath?
是真的吗，在关于所谓的2004年12月的第二次治疗事件，V.C. 和她先生证词矛盾？

Yes， That's true. Regarding the issue whether there was the said second treatment to treat V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004, V.C. (Mrs. Courtland), and her husband (Mr. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath.

V.C. told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment (see Fig. 1 below).

V.C.编了她在2004年12月受到我的骚扰、是发生在第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂的故事。为使得陪审团可以相信是有这第二次治疗，她说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的（见下面 Fig. 1）。

However, Victoria's husband, Mr. Courtland, provided an opposed statement that during the said second visit, Victoria's mother “did not attend." (See Fig. 2 below.)

但是，V.C.的先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，是他车V.C. 来做第二次治疗；他十分肯定地强调，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场（见下面 Fig. 2）。