CHARLIEYCHENG.COM美国冤案纪实Telling The truth

Why Innocent Charlie Y. Cheng Would Forgive Those Who
Fabricated Non-existent Sex Crimes Against Him For Their Own Gains?
为什么蒙冤的鄭志愚会原谅那些为谋个人私利，而谎编 ‘性侵’ 案件来陷害过他的人?

"Index" of the book 讀<目录页>

"forward" of the book 讀<前言>

"postscripts" of the book 讀<后记>

Under construction (ID: 20180315)

1. After the wrongful conviction, Mr. Cheng was informed: "You are an innocent man."
美国著名上诉律师勒▪纳斯堡的调查结果是：“你（笔者）是无辜的，因你
受到了两位不诚实女子的栽赃；我认为审判庭法官在本案处理上做错了。”

在被无辜被判刑后的第二年（2008），我在狱中收到了著名的上诉律师 Lenell Nussbaum 该律师的上述结论。
On the second year after the wrongful conviction and being imprison, I received Lenell Nussbaum's above letter.

2. Attorney Scott. J. Engelhard Declared, "Mr. Cheng is not quilty."
在法庭上，被告律师向陪审团宣告：“鄭先生是无罪的。”

According to the record, Attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared hat Charlie Y. Cheng "is a fine, fine human being." The trial
lawyer found: "Mr. Cheng is not guilty" for the 2007 accusation, and he"is innocent" man for he charge (click the right image).

3.    Scott J. Engelhard, the trial attorney, found that the trial judge's error
    "may be a good ground to get a new trial." But, after Mr. Cheng was
          wrongfully convicted, he didn't to ask to dismiss upon the Judge's error.
被告律师发现了法官的执法错误（她不许我的女病人为我作证）、给我电子信说，“万一你被判刑，
你可以用法官执法中的错误要求重审。”但是，当鄭先生被冤判、打入大牢后，被告律师却毫无声色。

4. After the 6/13/2007 Conviction, Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud (now
"Justice Sheryl Gordon MaCloud") had met Mr. Cheng in person
at King County Jail, willing to assist Charlie Y. Cheng's appeal
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任
大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。

Hon. Sheryl G. MaCloud was referred to Mr. Cheng by Scott J. Engelhard, trial attorney. Her Honor expressed her
willing to help Mr. Cheng's appeal of the 6/13/2007 conviction (click here to see the evidence).
在被误判后，著名的Sheryl G. MaCloud（她现在是华州最高法院的大法官）专门到监狱探视本网主，并表示要
替鄭先生上诉 (点击此处看证据）。

5. Regarding the statements of Victoria Forester Courtland,
the Prosecutor told the the trial Court, "Ms. Courtland with her
reports ... is not ... consistent. ... that's going to wheedle away
her case, and the strength of the State's case.“ （see below)
关于原告Victoria Forester Courtland 的证词，检方告诉法官：‘’Courtland
女士的证词前后不一致 ... 这将不利于检方的指控。“（见下面的法庭记录）

6. What were the accusers' statements made to the public at the open Court?

See the trial Court's transcript on pages 33-171 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony".

7.    It has been found that the 2007 trial against Charlie Cheng was the result
      of "the deceipt of these two women."   Why Mr. Cheng did not file a civil suit
  against the deceptive women but forgave them?

Because of God's teaching: TO FORGIVE (see pages 202-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").

8. Why after Charlie Cheng was convicted, the public asking Judge Nicole MacInnes,
“Please do not llow a miscarriage of justice"? (Below is one of the letters.)
為什麽在本网主被冤判后，审判庭法官收到许多来自社会各层人士替本网主伸冤和反对法庭误判的信件？

After the conviction, before the sentence hearing, Nicole MacInnes, the trial judge received 30+ letters from the public
in support Charlie Y. Cheng and in opposing the unfair trial. Above letter is one of them, in which Christine Davis wrote: "I have
always been grateful to Dr. Daniel Schiff for referring me to Dr. Cheng;" "Dr. Cheng is a highly professional, very business-like, yet
caring health provider. ... Please do not allow a miscarriage of justice." (See also sub-page: 'WHO IS CHARLIE Y. CHENG?"

9.    Was that true, when Charlie Cheng was a prisoner (for an alleged he had commited),
he was invited to meet Vice President Joe
Biden (see the left)?

             Yes. After the 6/13/2007 convictions against Mr. Cheng, the trial judge received
"30+ LETTERS" opposing the injustice because
Mr. Cheng was an innocent man.
   When Mr. Cheng was being incarcerated
at Airway Heights Correction Center ("AHCC") ,
he was even being invited to meet Vice President
Joe Biden with Sen. Patty Murray. (See the left.)

   鄭查理是位极为独特的囚犯：在他被蒙冤入狱后，
主审法官收到来自社会的30多封反对错判的来信；
现任大法官 Sheryl G. McCloud（当时她是著名的上诉
律师）表示过要替鄭先生申诉。即使在监狱服刑期，
鄭先生还受到美国参议员的邀请，同美国副总统
共进午餐（请见左手信）。

10. Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?

Yes, it is. In case Mr. Cheng was murdered after this injustice case being exposed, we urge the government reopen
the case to verify the material fact that whether the accusers made false claims against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng.

11. How Has Mr. Cheng been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections)?

He was treated quiet respectfully by the DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at Airway
Heights Corrections Center (AHCC). The following officers are deserved be promoted: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke,
Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad
Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer
Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger,
Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier,  Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele,
Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.   After Mr. Cheng's 5/20/2014 release,
he has been continually treating fairly by the CCO at the DOC Renton office, Washington.