M E M O I R ：
In 2019, Victoria Forester Courtland
Surrounded Her 2007's Restitution 
Against Innocent Charlie Y. Cheng

2020-02-27  13:07

T h a n k s   t o
​attorneys Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum !
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！​

Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！​

In order to share GOD's Mercy,
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under injustice, 
I disclosed my real disaster case with
undeniable evidence in this webside,
TELLING THE TRUTH.
Hopefully this will be an useful reference
for law students, justice workers
and all American families.
​为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。

Through the fact that in 2019
​Victoria Foresteer Courtland (V.C.)
surrendered her 2007 restitution,
​I witnessed God's Mercies again!
​

 A    P R O S E C U T O R ' S   2019   L E T T E R

     
​       In February of 2019, I received Prosecutor D. R.'s letter asking my opinion because “Victoria Courtland has asked "the Prosecutor's Office "to ask the court to stop restitution payment to her" from my 2007 conviction (see below).

                Victoria Courtland (AKA: Victoria Forester, Victoria Forester Courtland, "V.C.") is the author of "A Visible Woman", a short fiction being published in 2002 "was about a young woman being stalked". (Citing V.C.'s statement, see infra FACT-2). 
​               V.C. became more famous after she disclosed her full name publicly and being acting as Washington State's witness against an innocent health care provider at the open courts on 06/04/2007, 06/05/2007 and 09/07/2007 (see infra). 
 ​              Under oath at the public court, V.C. fabricated couple of non-existing facts against me.  For example, she claimed that her December of 2004 trip from the East Coast to Seattle (in the West Coast) was to see me for her uterine prolapse (V.C. claimed that she noticed it after her daughter was born in August 2004, and she was being suffering from the very painful problem but never seeing a physician in the East Coast where she have been living since 2001). According to V.C.'s false statement made under oath, during her (non-existing) second treatment session I 'inserted'  my thumb into her vagina treating her (non-existing) uterine prolapse. 
​            Upon the baseless accusations of V.C.'s, I was charged with second degree rape. (NOTE:  The Police and Prosecutor's Office did not ask V.C. to prove the crucial fact that she had been diagnosed with uterine prolapse by any physicians when she saw me in December of 2004.)

                At the trial on  06/05/2007, she declared publicly, "I do like creating stories."  (see below) 
              在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。

​B  A  C  K  G  R  O  U  N  D
​

             V.C.'s 06/06/2006 false report to the Seattle Police was made 18 months later, after she visiting me in December 2004 for purchasing K.R.'s 1998 information for her book to use (see evidence, infra).  On that visit, I rejected V.C.'s two requests -- one was to use our photo (which shows she and I being together in front of my clinic sign); another was asking me to give her an exclusive right to write my 1998 story about how I won K.R.'s 1998 retaliation, which was the same story Alexander J. Maxwell (a former English professor and my former English editor) had been preparing. 

            V.C. made numerous false statements to the law enforcement as well to the 2007 public court. For example, one side she said that her purpose of December-2004 trip -- flew to Seattle from the East Coast -- was to assist her sister's firs baby born; on the other side, she said that her Seattle trip was seeing my treatment for her uterine prolapse of which she noticed in August 2004 but didn't see any physicians before she saw me in December 2004. 

           V.C. has been no working since her daughter's born in 2004.  According to V.C. husband's statement,  during the 2007 trial period, they didn't have a house.  In 2007, V.C. asked a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her travel, child care, and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting habit, etc. but was not proved by the Court. 

          In December 2007, V.C. was granted for couple hundred dollars of restitution through the 2007 trial. 

          On 06/01/2015, I was informed by the Department of Correction (“DOC”) that V.C. had read my online memoir, TELLING THE TRUTH (this web).

          In 2017, I published "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" , in which I reasoned why I would forgive those who fabricated non-existing sex crime against me for their own gains.  Afterwards, in 2019 V.C. (the State's witness against me in 2007) voluntarily asked the Washington State Superior Court to terminate her 2007 restitution (she does not deserve) against me (see FACT-A, FACT-B & FACT-C, infra). 

                On 6/13/2007, ​I being wrongfully convicted for two counts of so-called "second degree rape" without any physical evidence; and the prosecution was not able to prove the alleged, so-called 'incident' time.         

                The Count One charge was a RETALIATION of Mrs. K.R.  who filed her counter-claim with the Department of Health ("DOH") on 5/26/1998, which was 5 weeks after she receiving of my 4/13/1998 certified mail  -- I refused to continue treating K.R. on 4/16/1998 and her husband on 4/17/1998 because I was being sexually assaulted by K.R. on 4/12/1998.                   Note:  In 2007, Defense attorney found that K.R. 'loaned' $10,000.00 to her witness C.B. to corroborate her allegation against me. （click here to see evidence）

              Regarding the  K.R.'s 1998 allegation, on 11/13/2001 the DOH finished their 3-year-length of investigation and found that I did NOT violated any law, (See the DOH's 11/13/2001 Order.)

            But for uncertain reason, K.R.'s 1998 allegation (which was being closed by the Seattle Police Department ("SPD") on 11/20/1998) had been reopened by a new Detective on 06/31/2006 -- that was being almost 8 years after the SPD closed its 1998 case -- as 'Count One' charge against me. 

             Note:   Neither the 1998 Detective or the 2006 Detective had interviewed me regarding K.R.'s 1998 allegations. (Details see TIMELINE infra.) 

             At the 2007 trial,  Defense attorney Scott  J. Engelhard  advised the trial  judge that the Statue of Limitation to charge the K.R.'s 1998 allegation had been expired.

 ​ 
​           The Count Two charge was raised by Mrs. V.C. on 6/6/2006,  that was the 18th month after our December-2004 conflict that on 12/21/2004 I didn't allow V.C. to use our 2001 photo (V.C. and I were shaking hands in front of my clinic sign) for her future book about me  (see infra).  On 12/21/2004 I also rejected V.C.'s request to grant her an exclusive right to write my story (re: Acuvibra Therapy and how I won over K.R.'s 1998 false allegations).

             At the 2007 trial, Prosecutor Ms. H. J. informed the trial Judge that State's witness V.C.'s statements were inconsistent (see infra FACT-9).      

             After I being wrongfully convicted on 6/13/2007, the trial Judge received 30+ opposing letters from the society against the unfair trial.  For example, Christine E. D., health care provider, wrote to the Judge, "I believe that allegations against Dr. Cheng must be invented for whatever reason by the two women who made them ... How could be convicted on the basis of two former patients who were seen by him decades apart? ... Please not allow a miscarriage of justice!"   (See infra 'Anser 2' in Q & A section).

                 On 9/7/2007 at the sentence court, V.C. disclosed the secret that she actually known the State's witness K.R. -- V.C. declared publicly, "I met previous victims to come forward again" (see infra "FACT-C", court's official transcript.) 
​                NOTE:  It was contracted to what V.C. testified at the 6/5/2007 court,  where V.C. denied this crucial fact under oath that she was knowing K.R. (See infra "FACT-3" and “FACT-4”, the court's transcript)
​
                On 9/7/2007, V.C. asked the Court for a restitution of  $12,372.00 on the basis, as she claimed publicly, "In the months preceding the the trial I was so fearful of facing the perpetrator again that I began biting my nails. ... my three year old daughter  was deeply affected by my anxiety  modeled my biting habit, and has not been able to stop herself.  I am now seeking treatment for her nervousness as she too has been a victim of this crime. ... I want the court to order Charlie Cheng to pay restitution ... I spent approximately $11,372 ... and anticipate to spend another thousand ... "  (quoted from her public statements.  See infra "FACT 6".)   
          NOTE:   It was contrary to what V.C. had claimed at the trial on 6/5/2007 -- V.C. declared under oath that she and her husband did NOT need money from the trial (see infra "FACT-5", court transcript). 

                In order to get above-mentioned $12,372.00 from the 2007 trial, at the 9/7/2007 court, V.C. also claimed publicly, "I was diagnosed with depression and post traumatic stress disorder following the rape." But she was not able to provide a diagnose to support her claim.   NOTE: Trial Judge Ms. N. M. told Defense Lawyer Mr. Engelhard, "There is no evidence for it (postpartum depression)."  (see FACT-C, infra). 
                 Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland's 9/7/2007 petitions to get $12,372.00 was rejected by the Court. 
                 In December of 2007, Mrs. Courtland was granted a restitution of $294.86.  See evidence).    ​      

​                In February of 2015 -- eight months after I being released from Airway Heights Correction Center (state's prison) where I had been living for 7 years -- I posted 100+ evidence onto my online memoir, www.CharlieYCheng,com (this web).   
               I proved the crucial fact that I was an innocent health care provider; And, the State's witness V.C. and K.R. were not the so-called 'victims' of mine.
                   
                On 6/1/2015, I was informed by the Department of Corrections that V.C. had read my online-memoir (regarding V.C.'s case) being posted in my website, "TELLING THE TRUTH", (this one).

               In 2017, my paper memoir titled "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" was published with 212 evidences. In which I reasoned why I would forgive K.R. and V.C. for their false allegations, because I am a Christian. "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." (MARK 11:26)
​
              On 6/13/2019, I received an e-copy of Washington State Superior Court Judge's order dated 2/25/2019 which stated that V.C. asked the Court to terminate her 2007 restitution against me (see infra "FACT-B").   ​

​T I M E L I N E  of  V. C.  (Count Two)
(Unfinished)

 12/09/1998,   V.C. was referred by Mitch to see me for her muscle injury.  That time she was a Marking Assistant.  He last name was “Forester", not "Courtland". (See evidenc "FACT-H" in "Q. 12", infra.)  

In 2001,  Before V.C. moving back to the East Coast, she asked me to have pictures taken with her.  I was told that our photos would be used for her future book about my Acuvibra Therapy. We had two photos taken in front of my clinic sign.                    
           Note:  Regarding the dates of our photos, V.C. have two versions:  (1)"would have been 2000." (Citing page 101 of the court's official transcript dated 06/05/2007.) (2) "It would have been just a few months or a couple months or even  a month ...  beforehand ... in  2001" (Citing page 106 of the court's official transcript dated 06/05/2007.) 

04/13/2001,    V.C. gave me her email asking me to email her above-mentioned two photos. I did.  (See "Q. 14", infra.)

07/02/2002,  V.C. flewback to Seattle from Stamford, Connecticut to see me for Acuvibra Therapy even though she had "no particular problem "(see evidence "FACT-J" in "Q.13", infra).  She discovered that I had won over the 1998 false allegations. V.C. was very interested in this 'new' story of mine.  (At the 6/5/2007 trial, V.C. told the Jury, "When I asked him if there had been a problem  with a misunderstanding by another client,  he did give me a positive indication about my interpretation  that there was a  misunderstanding." )  I told her that on 11/13/2001 the DOH had found tha I was NO guilty for K.R.'s 1998 accusation. She wanted adding the new story in her future book about my Acuvibra Therapy.
   
          On 07/02/2002, I did NOT disclose accuser K.R.'s name to V.C.  I asked V.C. to check the DOH's website because the DOH's 11/13/2001 ORDER had been posted there.

In 2003,  V.C.'s fiction, The Visible Woman "that was about a young woman being stalked" "was published in a magazine called the Worcestar Review." (Citing V.C.'s public statement, 06/05/2007), 

12/09/2004,  V.C.  flew back to Seattle from the East Coast with her 3-month-old daughter alone (her husband did not come out Seattle with them) assisting her sister Mrs. S. Goodall's first labor.   V.C.  came out to see me when waiting her sister's  labor which had been prolonged. 

12/15/2004,  the 6th day of arriving in Seattle, V.C.  came out my office checking the document of K.R.'s 1998 file for her future book about me.  I didn't allow her to make copy at my office.  She took notes including K.R.'s contact  information.  (Note: At the 9/7/2007 court, V.C. made a public statement that she contacted so-called 'victims', more than one. See evidence "FACT-C", infra).
               She paid $48 (check No. 1138) to buy K.R.'s information. See evidence, "FACT_L" in “Q18" infra).

12/17/2004,  V.C.  came out my office checking the document of B.C. (Bonnie C.) who made up the false claims in 1998 for the purpose to back up K.R.'s false claim (see supra).  V.C. took notes, and paid $48 (check No. 1139) to buy B.C.'s information.  See evidence "FACT_M" in “Q19" infra).        
             (Note: At the 9/7/2007 court, V.C. made a public statement that she contacted so-called 'victims', more than one.  See evidence "FACT-C", infra).  
            I told V.C. that former English Prof. Alex Maxwell was also interesting in writing my story about how I won K.R.'s and her two friends 1998 false allegations.

12/21/2004,  V.C.  came out my office checking the document of C.B. (Cheryl B.), B.C.'s daughter-in-law, who made up the false claims in 1998 for the purpose to back up K.R.'s false claim (see supra).  V.C. took notes of C.B., and paid $48 (check No. 1140) for getting C.B.'s information.  See evidence "FACT_N" in “Q20" infra).       
            (Note: At the 9/7/2007 court, V.C. made a public statement that she contacted so-called 'victims', more than one. See evidence "FACT-C", infra).  
            V.C. left my office  with angry because (1) I refused to grant the exclusive right to write my story, and (2) I did not allow her to use our 2001 photos that showing she and me were shaking hands together in front of my clinic sign in her future book about me.  (See infra evidence.)  

12/31/2004,  V.C.  flew back to the East Coast (see

​02/11/2005,   V.C. got her bank statement, the 'Consolidated Statement' for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005.  V.C.'s bank statement didn't reflect the fact, as V.C. claimed, that in December of 2004 she had paid me for treating her uterine prolapse (see "FACT-K" in ‘Q17', infra) . 

07/20/2005,   V.C. called King County Sexual Assault Resource ("KCSAR") from the East Coast and left message.  According  to the KCSAR, V.C. "would like some information' to report a sexual assault."

07/22/2005,   The KCSAR called V.C. back (Case No. 17654).  According to the KCSAR, "she is unsure is she  wants to report, discussed options, criminal vs civil, incident happened several years ago, unsure if there is still anything she can do, she lives out of state now, concerned what could happen if she does report."

07/25/2005,   The KCSAR spoke with V.C., "discussed response from the Police." The KCSAR recommended V.C. "to file for the info through criminal records" with the SPD.

08/18/2005,   The KCSAR closed V.C.'s  case because of "no response from client."

06/06/2006,   V.C. called the Seattle Police Department.

05/02/2007,  My attorney received the copies of V.C.'s three checks she paid me in December of 2004 (see FACT_L in "Q18", FACT_M in "Q19" and FACT_N in "Q20", infra) from V.C.'s bank in the East Coast.  
        Note:  My attorney subpoenaed V.C.'s three checks of December 2004 because V.C. and the Prosecutor's Office only gave him V.C. bank's "Consolidated Statement" but no the copies of V.C.'s three checks. the Defense lawyer the copy of V.C.'s checks related to V.C.'s allegation. (See FACT_O，infra).

​                               (Unfinished ... Under Construction)


                  NOTE:  On June 5th of 2007 ,  V.C. declared publicly at the open court that she was afraid to call the Police because I (who  lives  in the West Coast) would "kill" her (who lives in the East Coast). (See evidence in "Q17", infra.)  

          After the December-2014 conflict, V.C. “met“ K.R., (who later became the State's witness against me for the 2007 trial) and encouraged K.R. “to come forward again.” (Citing from V.C.'s public statement dated 09/07/2007). (See infra evidence.)

          18 months later since the December 2004 conflict,  in June of 2006, V.C. called the Seattle Police from the East Coast and made a false report that she‘s benn sexually assaulted by me during a December-2004 treatment for her 'uterine prolapse'.  V.C. claimed that she had the prolapse problem since her daughter's birth in August of 2004.  The reason she didn't see O.B. or any physicians to treat the alleged 'uterine prolapse' in the past 3 months, but rather (waiting 3 months) to fly to Seattle to see me for a 'treatment' in December of 2004, V.C. told the jury that because she and I had a patient and doctor's relationship. (See infra evidence.)

          V.C. claimed that she'd told her Korean friend K. O'Connell about the alleged 'December-2004 assault.'  On 06/26/2006 Seattle Police detective Ms. S. interviewed with K.O. and wrote: "Ms. O'Connell doesn't remember specifically what kind of contact it was, or if V/Courtland even told her what Dr. Cheng did."   (See infra evidence.) On 04/09/2007, the Prosecutor's Office subpoenaed K.O. be the State's witness at the trial.  (See infra evidence.) But, K.O. didn't show up at the trial to support V.C.'s claim.

          V.C. claimed that she also told Dr. Howard Blum about the alleged 'December-2004 assault'.  Detective Ms. S. telephoned Dr. Blum on 06/30/2006 to verify V.C.'s claim.  She wrote that Dr. Blum was "one of the people to whom V/Courtland disclosed the incident with S/Cheng;" And,  Dr. Blum "doesn't remember a conversation with Victoria Courtland about this incident."  (See infra evidence.)

          On 6/7/2007, at the 2007 trial, Detective Ms. S. disclosed a secret to the Jury, "She (V.C.) told me that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time she saw him (me)." (See infra evidence.)
​
          In 2015, V.C. read my website (this one) in which I revealed undeniable evidences demonstrating the fact that "V.C." made up the non-existing 2004 'sex crime' against  a moral health care provider for her own gains (infra). 

          In 2017, I published above memoir titled "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony" (ISBN 978-1-5136-2440-2) in which I gave the reason why I would forgive those who made false claims against me, because God's words to forgive. 
​
          In 2019, V.C. asked the Court to terminate her 2007 victim restitution of which she does not deserve.   (Note:  V.C.'s 2019 request has been printed on the cover of “FACTS:  Victoria Forester Courtland Created A Non-existing 2004 Sex Crime", see supra. ).

​          I'm Charlie Y. Cheng, a moral health care provider who had no criminal history before the false accusations created by Victoria Forester Courtland (AKA：Victoria Courtland, Victoria Forester, "V.C.") in 2006.
             在受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。

            Before the 9/7/2007 sentencing hearing, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court for cause No.  06-1-05678-3 (my case) received dozens of opposing letters in support of me because 'Mr. Cheng is not guilty' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) . 
​           当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。

          On 9/9/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for an alleged sex crime (that was created by Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland but I did not commit),  Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:  
​           "You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ...  the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see below)
​         在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)

          13 year ago in 2006, after making false report to the Seattle Police to hurt me, Victoria Forester Courtland became 'depressed' (see her statement to the open Court on September 7th, 2007, see infra). 
         In 2019, Mrs. Courtland finally made a correct decision in asking the Court "to stop restitution payment to her" (citing Prosecutor David Ryan's letter).
          在13年前的2006年，V.C.博士向西雅图警方报了假案来陷害我之后，她得了忧郁症（请见下面刊出的她2007年9月7日在公开法庭上的自白）。
​          在2019年，她要求法庭终止我对她的赔款（见检察官David Ryan 给我的来信）。

        On 6/13/2019, Prosecutor D. I. R. emailed me: "restitution payments to VC were terminated per attached order“ (see image FACT-A). 
​          在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。

         Below (FACT-B) is Prosecutor D. R.'s 6/13/2019 attachment, the "AGREED AMENDMENT TO ORDER SETTING RESTITUTION Dated 12/18/2007, TERMINATING PAYMENT TO V.C. (DOB ...)” signed by Judge Michael Ryan on 2/25/2019.   
       他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。

       ​  The Superior Court's 2/25/2019 Order was prepared by the Prosecutor upon Dr. Courtland's request, it states, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments.  Therefore, restitution payment to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (see FACT-B below) 
         最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见下面FACT-B)。

               Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to participate in the 2007 trial had been documented in the official document of 9/7/2007 Washington State Superior court as asking for $12,372.00 (see evidence, infra).
              VC博士出庭2007的动机是要求得到12万3百72美元的回报（见FACT-6, infra)。

             Usually, a victim will feel relaxed after reporting a bad person to the Police because his/her stress being released.  However, Dr. Courtland declared publicly at the 9/7/2007 Court, "After reporting Charlie Cheng to the Seattle Police I became so depressed ...” （see below transcript, lines 12-13). But, the  Judge told Defense Lawyer Mr. Engelhard, "There is no evidence for it." (see below)
              通常，受害人举报坏人后会感到心情轻松因为压力被减少了。但，VC博士在2007年9月7日的法庭上公开宣称：“自从我向西雅图警察局举报鄭先生之后，我心情变得诅丧 ..." （请见下面法院现场记录的第12-13行）。

              Note：V.C. spoke publicly (see above), "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape." But the  Judge told Defense Lawyer Mr. Engelhard, "There is no evidence for it (postpartum depression)."   Also, V.C. did not provide any evidence to prove her claim that she's being raped.
​

        Regarding Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to make the false 'sex assault' report, Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against  Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E.)

          In order to get a restitution to cover up travel cost and to treat 3-year-old daughter's bad habit of biting nails, at the 9/7/2007 open Court, Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland created non-existing fact of 'RAPE‘ against me (see FACT-D below).

​Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") became a public figure after she disclosed her name at the public court (see below)

             Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) knew how to create stories. At the 6/5/2007 Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland declared publicly, "I'm an intelligent person" , and "I did teach creating writing."  (see FACT-1, below)

The most famous story created by Dr. Courtland
was that "following ​the rape." (see supra FACT-D).
The others see "Q & A" sections (infra).

            Regarding Dr. Courtland's stories, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen pointed out:
​           "Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews.  There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
​
          关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）

​Below are part of Dr. Courtland's
inconsistent statements under oath.

        For example, one side, Dr. Courtland said that she had met State's another witness, Kathryn R. (the so-called 'victim') and encouraged her "to come forward again" (see below FACT-3).

             On another side under oath, Dr. Courtland would give a contrary story that she did "not' know Kathryn R.  (see fact 4 below).

           Dr. Courtland's other inconsistent stories (e.g., regarding whether she really talked with an acupuncture about the non-existing alleged 2004 assault, on 12/21/2006 she told the Prosecutor that the acupuncturist was "Kimberly Hughes"; then, at the 2007 trial, she changed to "Priscilla Xu"), please see infra Q & A Section.
         有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。

        Regarding Victoria Forester's motivation, one side, at the 6/5/2007 open court, she said under oath, "we didn't need money” (see FACT-5 below).​   
        有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。

​            On another side, at the 9/7/2007 Court, Dr. Courtland would make a 180-degree turn by asking a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her trip and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6 below).
         另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).

          Note:  even if Victoria Forester Courtland claimed that her daughter "has been a victim" of mine (see above lines 16-17 on FACT-6), 98% of her $12,372.00 of restitution demand was NOT granted by the Washington State Superior Court (supra).
         值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.​

          At the 2007 public trial, Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) presented to the Jury a non-existing 'fact' under oath that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second treatment session' in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
          In order to convince the Jury to believe the story,  Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below).  It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
          Notably,  neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims. 

                    Dr. Courtland's crucial false statement to the public made under oath was that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second' session of treating her uterine prolapse in December of 2004!
                    I don't treat uterine prolapse!
                    This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below). 
                       VC博士是在宣誓下说谎！因我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ 。有关我曾经的治疗范围，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。

          Regarding the issue of whether Dr. Courtland was seeing me in 2004 for treating her 'uterine prolapse," at the 6/7/2007 trial court, Seattle Police Detective Stangeland disclosed two secrets to the public:  (1) Ms. Courtland was not see me for uterine prolapse, and (2) 'she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time' she saw me in 2004 (see below).

          At the 2007 trial, under oath Dr. Courtland created a story that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her 'second' treatment session for her uterine prolapse in December, 2004.
           在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。

         Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
​         (A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
         (B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
         关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】；   但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。

 Actually, V.C. had make a false report to the law enforcement (see Part B below); But, 
she said under oath that she "was afraid to contact law enforcement' (see Part A below).

At the 2007 trial, when V.C. was asked why did she wait 18-months long to make the alleged event?  She gave two reasons
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her.  (See FACT-G, infra)

         The fact that I forgive Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland (Victoria Forester) who created non-existing ‘sex assault’ to hurt me, has been documented in my 2017 book, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness"  with undeniable evidence (see below) .
         关于我原谅V.C. 博士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。

​Unfinished ... More  coming soon!     
​网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
​

​Q 1:     Have you had a fair trial?  你有没有受到公平的审判？

        No.  I didn't have a fair trial.  For example, my constitution right to have my own witness had been deprived by the trial Court (see Attorney Scott J. Engelhard's email dated 6/1/2007, below)    
     我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。

​Q 2：  What's your former female patients' response after you being convicted?

          After I was wrongfully convicted, Judge Nicole Macinnes received many of opposing letters from my former female patients.  Below is one of them.
          在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。

Q 3:     Is it true that Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud (she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) met you in person at King  County Jail, willing to assist your appeal?

           That's true.  
​
       当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。

​Q 4:    On 6/5/2007, V.C. made a public claim that in December of 2004 you touched her sex organ to  treat her uterine prolapse which was the reason she saw you.  Have you touch V.C.'s sex organ as a treatment? 

                    Not All!  Actually, V.C. knew the fact that my treatment does not touch sex organs. (see V.C.'s "Patient's Consent Form" dated 07/02/2002 in FACT_P below)

Q 5:    Is it true that Mrs. Courtland claimed that she told her husband about the alleged assault, but V.C. could not recall when she told him?
​
         Yes. That's true.

Q 6：    After the appellate lawyer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women,"   why would you forgive them?   为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？

          I forgive "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.”   (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
​                  之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。

Q 7：   How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?

           AI had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison. 
​       I'd like to give special thanks to:  David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke,  Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers,  Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon,  Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke,  Dennis Able,  Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier,  Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.   

Q 8：     Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?
             本冤案实情在网上公布后，你会受到生命威胁吗？

                Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing bias and racialism！   是存在这种危险性，因为偏见和种族主义的存在！

Q 9：     Why would Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) make false claims to hurt you?
              为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？

​               Because of our conflict happened in the end of V.C.'s third visit -- I reject her demand for an exclusive right to write my story because Prof. Alex Maxwell (my English editor for my three books in English) also wanted to write my story.  And, I did no allow V.C. to use the 2000-01 photo which showing she was shaking hands with me, in her book.

              In the end of the third visit, Victoria Forester Courtland left my office very angry. 

​Q 10:     What's V.C.'s recollection about the said second treatment session for her uterine prolapse?

             She insisted that I treated her uterine prolapse in her seconded treatment session on 12/17/2007. And, she left my office without fair (see the transcript below).

Q 11:       Is it true that on 11/13/2001, the Department of Health (DOH) found that you were not guilty for K.R.'s 1998 complaint (the 
                Count One charge against you in the 2006) ?
           2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？

           A10:    Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.

​Unfinished ... More  coming soon!     网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！

​Q 12:   When did you met Victoria Forester-Coutland?

                 I knew Victoria Forester-Courtland since 1998.  That time her name was "Victoria Forester".   She was referred to me by her friend "Mitch" (see below), a psychologist who's a years-long client of me, because Victoria Forester felt down from a ladder and injured herself during a work. 

​Q 13:   When was the last time V.C. was being treated by you?
​
           ​It' was July 2nd of 2002.  That time her name was not "Courtland" but "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester (see below).​  This is my evidence to prove the crucial fact that I did not treat V.C.'s uterine prolapse in her December-2004 visit.
​

Q 14:    Is it true that on 06/07/2006 Victoria Forester Courtland told Detective Stangeland she had pictures taken with you,               but at the 06/05/2007 trial, she denied under oath?

             Yes, It's true! 

             Regarding whether V.C. had the copy of photography showing she and me together, V.C. had two opposite versions:
On June 7 of 2006, she told the Detective she had the picture (see FACT-Q below);

       
                    However, on June 7 of 2006, at the trial V.C. denied under oath (see FACT-R below);

Q 15:     At the trial,  Victoria Forester Courtland told the Jury that the reason she didn't see any physicians at the East Coast (where she lives) for her painful 'uterine prolapse', but rather waiting 3 more months to fly to Seattle (the West Coast) to see you, because she and you 'always' have a 'doctor and patient' relationship'.  Do you and Dr. Courtland always have a doctor and patient relationship as she claimed?
​
             ​​  No.
​

Q 16:    Mrs. Courtland claimed that she was 'sex assaulted' by you in 2004.  Why she did not report to the Police in 2004, but waited to June of 2006?

          Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
        (1)  "I am afraid that ... there would be a  retribution for calling the police"; and
        (2)  "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)

               Note:   During the deposition held by Defense attorney Scott Engelhard and Prosecutor Heather Jensen on 12/01/2006, V.C. did not made above claim that the reason she was being waiting for 18 months long to call Seattle Police because she had "great fear" that I would "kill" her.
​
​

​Q 17:    V.C. claimed that in December of 2004 she saw you three times for treating her uterine prolapse, but she was not able to provide a diagnosis to prove her claim. What else she provided to the trial court as her exhibit to support her claim against you?

            At  the 2007 trial, the Prosecutor submitted V.C.'s 2-page Consolidated Statement for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005 (see "FACT-K" below) as their evidence.  And, this is the only physical evidence she had to support her claims.
​
           On the top line of the V.C.'s bank statement (below), it documented the fact that V.C. received 2-page Consolidated Statement on 02/11/2005, which were almost 14-months before she made the false report to the SPD on 06/06/2006. 

​Q 18:    When was V.C.'s first visit of you in December of 2004? 

             According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1138,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s first visit was 12/15/2004 (see FACT_L below),

​
​Q 19:    When was V.C.'s second visit of you in December of 2004? 

             According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1139,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s second visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_M below),

​
​Q 20:    When was V.C.'s third visit of you in December of 2004? 

                         According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1140,  which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s third visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_N below),.

​Q 21:    Did V.C. submit above-mentioned her three December-2004 checks to the trial court as her evidence to support her claim against you? 

                        No.  V.C. did NOT! 

                      Because she only give the copy of her bank's "Consolidated Statement from 12/9/2004 to 1/10/2005" (see supra “FACT_K") but omitted above-mentioned her three checks (No. 1138, 1139 & 1140) which are crucial evidence to prove I was innocent for V.C.'s baseless claim, that's why my lawyer Mr. Engelhard had to issue a subpoena to her bank in the East Coast (see "FACT_O", infra).

​
Q 21:    At the 2007 trial, Victoria Forester Courtland claimed under oath that you touched her sex organ.  Is that part of your              treatment?

                 No such things happened. The nature of my treatment had been documented in the Patient's Consent form (see FACT-P below).

Q 22:    Did the accusers proved their accusations against you?

          Not all! 
          The prosecution did not prove the following two crucial facts: 
             (1) I had been with accuser K.R. (count one accuser) during the alleged incident time -- after 7:00 p.m. on 04/12/1998, the Easter Sunday. (Note: K.R. fabricated a fact that she'd been sexually touched by me after 7:00 p.m. before 8:15 p.m.  However, I had been with Mr. Taoyuan Wang's wife and two children after 6:30 p.m. in my office. see K.R.);
​             (2) I 'treated' V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004 (Note: V.C. fabricated a fact that I inserted my finger into her vagina treating her uterine prolapse in her second session.  (Note:  V.C. claimed that 4 days later, after the alleged second treatment, her father and husband drove her came out again for a third treatment, but she did NOT ask these two men to stay with her inside of my clinic.  Details? see infra court transcripts.) 

Q 23:    Have you appealed?

            On my sentence day, September 7th of 2007,  my appellate attorney was presented. 
​           I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014). 
           I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.  

 Q 24: Had the Jury heard your testimony in your English directly? or through an interpret?

              At the trial, my testimony was made in Mandarin.  It was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter for translating Mandarin to English.  In  another word, the Jury only heard second hand testimony of mine.

              My interpreter's crucial errors (she added non-existing criminal elements) contributed to the miscarriage of justice. 
​

Under construction ...  more coming soon  
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com