Victoria Forester Courtland (Victoria Forester)'s surrender
and Charlie Y. Cheng's Forgiveness to Her
Under construction: 2019-10-17, 21:22)
and Charlie Y. Cheng's Forgiveness to Her
Under construction: 2019-10-17, 21:22)
Thanks to attorneys Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Mrs. Nassbaum !
感谢我的律师Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Engelhard和Nassbaum！
感谢我的律师Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Engelhard和Nassbaum！
I'm Charlie Y. Cheng, a moral health care provider who had no criminal history before the false accusations created by Victoria Forester Courtland (AKA：Victoria Courtland, Victoria Forester, "V.C.") in 2006.
在受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。
在受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。
Before the 9/7/2007 sentencing hearing, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court for cause No. 06-1-05678-3 (my case) received dozens of opposing letters in support of me because 'Mr. Cheng is not guilty' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) .
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) made a correct decision to surrender her 2007 institution which was based upon false claims because she knew that I did not commit the said 2004 sex crime.
Below is the nature of Dr. Courtland's 2006 false claim.
On 9/9/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for an alleged sex crime (that was created by Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland but I did not commit), Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
Below is the nature of Dr. Courtland's 2006 false claim.
On 9/9/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for an alleged sex crime (that was created by Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland but I did not commit), Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
13 years later after Dr. Courtldand's 2006 false
report to the Police, an amazing thing happened ...
在V.C.博士2006年6月向西雅图警方
谎报之后的第13年,奇迹发生了 ...
report to the Police, an amazing thing happened ...
在V.C.博士2006年6月向西雅图警方
谎报之后的第13年,奇迹发生了 ...
On 6/13/2019, I was informed by Prosecutor David I. Ryan, "restitution payments to VC were terminated per attached order“ (see image FACT-A). Isn't it amazing? I did not ask the former State's witness to give up her 11-year-old restitution ($294.86)!
在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年$294.86赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。
在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年$294.86赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。
Below (FACT-B) is Prosecutor D. Ryan's 6/13/2019 attachment, the "AGREED AMENDMENT TO ORDER SETTING RESTITUTION Dated 12/18/2007, TERMINATING PAYMENT TO V.C. (DOB ...)” signed by Judge Michael Ryan on 2/25/2019.
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
The Superior Court's 2/25/2019 Order was prepared by the Prosecutor upon Dr. Courtland's request, it states, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments. Therefore, restitution payment to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (see FACT-B below)
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见下面FACT-B)。
It seems to me, it's Dr. Courtland's alternative way of apology to me for her 2006's false report against me to the Seattle Police.
我意识到，这是她变相的对我道歉，因为她在2006年向西雅图警察局谎报案情来陷害我。
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见下面FACT-B)。
It seems to me, it's Dr. Courtland's alternative way of apology to me for her 2006's false report against me to the Seattle Police.
我意识到，这是她变相的对我道歉，因为她在2006年向西雅图警察局谎报案情来陷害我。
The amount of V.C.'s "restitution dated 12/18/07' (citing from FACT-B supra) is only $294.86 (see the lower part of FACT-C, infra).
上面 (FACT-B) 法院文件中所提到的VC博士的12/18/07赔偿金数额，是294.86美元。
上面 (FACT-B) 法院文件中所提到的VC博士的12/18/07赔偿金数额，是294.86美元。
Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to participate in the 2007 trial had been documented in the official document of 9/7/2007 Washington State Superior court as asking for $12,372.00 (see FACT-C, below).
VC博士出庭2007的动机是要求得到12万3百72美元的回报（见FACT-C)。
Unfortunately, 98% of the $12,372.00 that Dr. Courtland demanded was declined by the Washington State Superior Court. Only $294.86 (see FACT-C below), which is about 2% of $12,372.00 Dr. Courtland demented for, was granted on 12/18/2007.
遗憾的是，她想要的98%都被法庭拒绝了。她只被批准$294.86 （见FACT-C的下部分），这是她所要数的2%。
VC博士出庭2007的动机是要求得到12万3百72美元的回报（见FACT-C)。
Unfortunately, 98% of the $12,372.00 that Dr. Courtland demanded was declined by the Washington State Superior Court. Only $294.86 (see FACT-C below), which is about 2% of $12,372.00 Dr. Courtland demented for, was granted on 12/18/2007.
遗憾的是，她想要的98%都被法庭拒绝了。她只被批准$294.86 （见FACT-C的下部分），这是她所要数的2%。
I haven't written a check of $294.86 to Victoria
Forester Courtlad for the said restitution'
since the Court's 12/18/2007 order (above).
自从法院的12/18/2007决定后，
我还没写过一张$294.86支票给V.C。
Why would "V.C." not pursue the 2007
restitution she hasn't got, but
rather to surrender it in 2019?
为什么VC博士不去追我未付她的2007赔偿，
反而会在2019却要法庭终止给她这赔款？
Forester Courtlad for the said restitution'
since the Court's 12/18/2007 order (above).
自从法院的12/18/2007决定后，
我还没写过一张$294.86支票给V.C。
Why would "V.C." not pursue the 2007
restitution she hasn't got, but
rather to surrender it in 2019?
为什么VC博士不去追我未付她的2007赔偿，
反而会在2019却要法庭终止给她这赔款？
In order to get a restitution to cover up travel cost and to treat 3-year-old daughter's bad habit of biting nails, at the 9/7/2007 open Court, Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland created non-existing fact of 'RAPE‘ against me (see FACT-D below).
(NOTE: If her 'rape' story were true, I should be sentenced for 15 years at least. In another words, I will not be released before 2023.)
为了获得一笔赔偿来支付旅行费用和给3岁大的女儿治疗咬手指的坏毛病，V.C. 博士在2007年9月7居然空开谎称、被我'强奸'过（见下面法庭记录）。（【注】如果真有像她所称的’强奸‘，那起码要判15年，即到2023年方可出狱。她的谎言编得太大了。）
(NOTE: If her 'rape' story were true, I should be sentenced for 15 years at least. In another words, I will not be released before 2023.)
为了获得一笔赔偿来支付旅行费用和给3岁大的女儿治疗咬手指的坏毛病，V.C. 博士在2007年9月7居然空开谎称、被我'强奸'过（见下面法庭记录）。（【注】如果真有像她所称的’强奸‘，那起码要判15年，即到2023年方可出狱。她的谎言编得太大了。）
According to the police records,
there was no 'rape' being reported.
Why does Dr. Courtland say
"following the rape"?
there was no 'rape' being reported.
Why does Dr. Courtland say
"following the rape"?
Usually, a victim will feel relaxed after reporting a bad person to the Police because his/her stress being released. However, Dr. Courtland declared publicly at the 9/7/2007 Court, "After reporting Charlie Cheng to the Seattle Police I became so depressed ...” （see below transcript, lines 12-13).
通常，受害人举报坏人后会感到心情轻松因为压力被减少了。但，VC博士在2007年9月7日的法庭上公开宣称：“自从我向西雅图警察局举报鄭先生之后，我心情变得诅丧 ..." （请见下面法院现场记录的第12-13行）。
通常，受害人举报坏人后会感到心情轻松因为压力被减少了。但，VC博士在2007年9月7日的法庭上公开宣称：“自从我向西雅图警察局举报鄭先生之后，我心情变得诅丧 ..." （请见下面法院现场记录的第12-13行）。
Why Dr. Courtland "became so
depressed" after reporting me
to the Seattle Police ?
depressed" after reporting me
to the Seattle Police ?
Regarding Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to make the false 'sex assault' report, Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E.)
I am a victim of the violation of the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (see attorney Scott Engelhard's email below).
我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。
我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。
There is NO evidence of V.C. being raped.
Why would Victoria Forester Courtland create a
false 'RAPE' story to harm an innocent man?
(See infra "Q&A" section)
Why would Victoria Forester Courtland create a
false 'RAPE' story to harm an innocent man?
(See infra "Q&A" section)
Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) knew how to create stories. At the 6/5/2007 Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland declared publicly, "I'm an intelligent person" , and "I did teach creating writing." (see FACT-1, below)
Victoria Forester (Victoria Courtland) declared at the 6/5/2007 open Court, "I do like creating stories." (see below)
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
The most famous story created by Dr. Courtland
was that "following the rape." (see supra FACT-D).
The others see "Q & A" sections (infra).
was that "following the rape." (see supra FACT-D).
The others see "Q & A" sections (infra).
Regarding Dr. Courtland's stories, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen pointed out:
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below inmage FACT-2)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-2的法庭记录。）
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below inmage FACT-2)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-2的法庭记录。）
Below are part of Dr. Courtland's
inconsistent statements under oath.
For example, one side, Dr. Courtland said that she had met State's another witness, Kathryn R. (the so-called 'victim') and encouraged her "to come forward again" (see below FACT-3).
On another side under oath, Dr. Courtland would give a contrary story that she did "not' know Kathryn R. (see fact 4 below).
Dr. Courtland's other inconsistent stories (e.g., regarding whether she really talked with an acupuncture about the non-existing alleged 2004 assault, on 12/21/2006 she told the Prosecutor that the acupuncturist was "Kimberly Hughes"; then, at the 2007 trial, she changed to "Priscilla Xu"), please see infra Q & A Section.
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
Regarding Victoria Forester's motivation, one side, at the 6/5/2007 open court, she said under oath, "we didn't need money” (see FACT-5 below).
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
On another side, at the 9/7/2007 Court, Dr. Courtland would make a 180-degree turn by asking a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her trip and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6 below).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
Notably, even if Victoria Forester Courtland claimed that her daughter "has been a victim" of mine (see above lines 16-17 on FACT-6), 98% of her $12,372.00 of restitution demand was NOT granted by the Washington State Superior Court (supra).
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
At the 2007 public trial, Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) presented to the Jury a non-existing 'fact' under oath that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second treatment session' in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
Dr. Courtland's crucial false statement to the public made under oath was that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second' session of treating her uterine prolapse in December of 2004!
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
VC博士是在宣誓下说谎！因我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ 。有关我曾经的治疗范围，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
VC博士是在宣誓下说谎！因我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ 。有关我曾经的治疗范围，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
Regarding the issue of whether Dr. Courtland was seeing me in 2004 for treating her 'uterine prolapse," at the 6/7/2007 trial court, Seattle Police Detective Stangeland disclosed two secrets to the public: (1) Ms. Courtland was not see me for uterine prolapse, and (2) 'she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time' she saw me in 2004 (see below).
At the 2007 trial, under oath Dr. Courtland created a story that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her 'second' treatment session for her uterine prolapse in December, 2004.
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
There is no clue why Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) actually made a false reported to the law enforcement regarding the non-existing 2004 treatment (see Part B below), but she would claim under oath that "I was afraid to contact law enforcement' (see Part A below).
The fact that I forgive Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland (Victoria Forester) who created non-existing ‘sex assault’ to hurt me, has been documented in my 2017 book, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness" with undeniable evidence (see below) .
关于我原谅V.C. 博士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
关于我原谅V.C. 博士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
Unfinished ... More coming soon!
网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q1： What's your former female patients' response after you being convicted?
After I was wrongfully convicted, Judge Nicole Macinnes received many of opposing letters from my former female patients. Below is one of them.
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。
Q2: Is it true that Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud (she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) met you in person at King County Jail, willing to assist your appeal?
That's true.
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
Q3: In appellate lawyer Ms. Nussbaum's 9/9/2008 letter (supra), she wrote, "You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ." who is another woman?
"Kathryn R." (AKA: “K.R.", "Kathy P.") is the other woman who met Victoria Forester Courtland, which had been disclosed to the public via Dr. Courtland's public letter dated 9/7/2007 (see supra).
"K.R." made false claim against me. Below is the outline of K.R.'s case:
Q4: Is it true that Dr. Courtland claimed that she told her husband about the alleged assault happened in the second session in 2004, but she could not recall when she told?
Yes. That's true.
Q5： After the appellate layer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women," why would you forgive them? 为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？
I forgive "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
I forgive "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
Q6： How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?
AI had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison.
I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
Q7： Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?
本冤案实情在网上公布后，你会受到生命威胁吗？
Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing racialism！ 是存在这种危险性，因为种族主义的存在！
Q8： Why would Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) make false claims to hurt you?
为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？
为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？
I only remember that there was a dispute in the end of Dr. Courtland's third visit in December of 2004 -- I reject her demand for an exclusive right to write my story because Prof. Alex Maxwell, who's my English editor for my three books in English, also wanted to write my story. And, I not allowed her to use 'our' 2000-01 photo which showing she was shaking hands with me, in her book.
In the end of the third visit, Victoria Forester Courtland left my office very angry.
NOTE: Under oath, Dr. Courtland declared that she told her husband about the alleged sex assaulted after the so-called 'second treatment'. According to Dr. Courtland, her husband and her father then gave her a right for third visit. If it were true, why her husband never mad at me?
Q9: What's Dr. Courtland's recollection about the said second treatment session for her uterine prolapse?
Dr. Courtland said that after the alleged second treatment session, she left my office without fair (see the transcript below).
Q10: Is it true that on 11/13/2001, the Department of Health (DOH) found that you were not guilty for K.R.'s 1998 complaint (the Count One charge against you in the 2006) ?
2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？
A10: Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.
2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？
A10: Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q11: When did you met Victoria Forester-Coutland?
I knew Victoria Forester-Courtland since 1998. That time her name was "Victoria Forester". She was referred to me by her friend "Mitch" (see below), a psychologist who's a years-long client of me, because Victoria Forester felt down from a ladder and injured herself during a work.
Q 12: Was Victoria's surname "Courtland" when you saw her in 2002?
It's not. In 2002 Victoria's last name was "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester, (see below).
Q 12: Was Victoria's surname "Courtland" when you saw her in 2002?
It's not. In 2002 Victoria's last name was "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester, (see below).
Q 13: Is it true that Victoria Forester Courtland had pictures taken with you in 2000?
It's true! In 2000, she drove from her graduate school in Bellingham, 79.45 miles north of Seattle, to my clinic asking me to have pictures taken with her (see below). I was told that she would use it for her future book about me.
Q 14: At the trial, Victoria Forester Courtland told the Jury that the reason she didn't see any physicians at the East Coast (where she lives) for her painful 'uterine prolapse', but rather 3 more months to fly to Seattle (the West Coast) to see you, because she and you 'always' have a 'doctor and patient' relationship'. Do you and Dr. Courtland always have a doctor and patient relationship as she claimed?
No.
Is it funny, Dr. Courtland and her statements were contradicted each other?
Who lied under oath?
Q15: Dr. Courtland claimed that she was assaulted by you in 2004. Why she did not report to the Police in 2004, but waited to June of 2006?
Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
The 2007 wrongful conviction against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng
is part of American history. American deserve to know it!
华盛顿州2007年判无辜者入狱，是美国历史的一部分，值得了解它的真像！
is part of American history. American deserve to know it!
华盛顿州2007年判无辜者入狱，是美国历史的一部分，值得了解它的真像！
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Under construction ... more coming soon
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
