Why Does "Whistler" Victoria
Forester Courtland Give up
Her 2007 Restitution Against
Innocent Charlie Y. Cheng?
Forester Courtland Give up
Her 2007 Restitution Against
Innocent Charlie Y. Cheng?
2020-03-30 22:03
T h a n k s t o
attorneys Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum !
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！
attorneys Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum !
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！
Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！
G L O R Y T O G O D !
Have you seen a convicted sex criminal
who would be supported by our society
after being convicted? YES,
I ,Charlie Y. Cheng, am the one!
who would be supported by our society
after being convicted? YES,
I ,Charlie Y. Cheng, am the one!
In 2007, after I being wrongfully convicted
for the NON-EXITING sex crime, the trial
judge of Washington State Superior Court
received 30+ opposing letters from
American society against the injustice.
(See evidence: the letters)
for the NON-EXITING sex crime, the trial
judge of Washington State Superior Court
received 30+ opposing letters from
American society against the injustice.
(See evidence: the letters)
Then, in 2019, Victoria Forester
Courtland who made false claims
under oath in the 2007 court,
asked the Court to terminate
her 2007 restitution against me.
Courtland who made false claims
under oath in the 2007 court,
asked the Court to terminate
her 2007 restitution against me.
In order to share GOD's Mercy,
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under
injustice (as I'd experienced),
I disclosed my real disaster case with
undeniable evidence in this webside,
TELLING THE TRUTH.
Hopefully it will be an useful reference
for law students, justice workers
and all American families.
为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under
injustice (as I'd experienced),
I disclosed my real disaster case with
undeniable evidence in this webside,
TELLING THE TRUTH.
Hopefully it will be an useful reference
for law students, justice workers
and all American families.
为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。
Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.")
became a public figure after she
disclosed her name voluntarily
at the public court and being
a State's witness at the open court
against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng.
became a public figure after she
disclosed her name voluntarily
at the public court and being
a State's witness at the open court
against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng.
N O T E
The name of "Victoria Forester Courtland"
("V.C.") also had been disclosed to the
public in 2007 by V.C.'s sister Susan and
V.C.'s husband Matt at the Washington
State Superior Court. Matt said, "Her name
became Victoria Ann Forester Courtland."
(see "MATT-01")
The name of "Victoria Forester Courtland"
("V.C.") also had been disclosed to the
public in 2007 by V.C.'s sister Susan and
V.C.'s husband Matt at the Washington
State Superior Court. Matt said, "Her name
became Victoria Ann Forester Courtland."
(see "MATT-01")
A P R O S E C U T O R' S 2019 L E T T E R
In February of 2019, I received Prosecutor D. R.'s letter asking my opinion because “Victoria Courtland has asked "the Prosecutor's Office "to ask the court to stop restitution payment to her" from my 2007 conviction (see below).
F A C T S
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND ' S
' RAPE ' CLAIM FOR 2007 RESTITUTION
' RAPE ' CLAIM FOR 2007 RESTITUTION
According to the record, before the 09/07/2007 restitution hearing, V.C. never made a 'rape' report to the Police, nor had made such claim at the trial.
However, when V.C. asking the Washington State Superior Court for a restitution of $12,372.00, she made a baseless 'rape' claim to the public, "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
Regarding the so-called diagnoses, Judge N. M. said at her court before, "We have no evidence of it." (Citing page 178 of court's 06/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
However, when V.C. asking the Washington State Superior Court for a restitution of $12,372.00, she made a baseless 'rape' claim to the public, "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
Regarding the so-called diagnoses, Judge N. M. said at her court before, "We have no evidence of it." (Citing page 178 of court's 06/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
V.C. made a public claim that
her 3-year-old daughter
"had been a victim" of me
On September 7th of 2007 at the Washington State Superior Court, when V.C. asked for a $12,372 of restitution she claimed (via a letter being read to the public), "In the months preceding the the trial I was so fearful of facing the perpetrator again that I began biting my nails. ... my three year old daughter was deeply affected by my anxiety modeled my biting habit, and has not been able to stop herself. I am now seeking treatment for her nervousness as she too has been a victim of this crime. ... I want the court to order Charlie Cheng to pay restitution ... I spent approximately $11,372 ... and anticipate to spend another thousand ... " (quoting V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statements. See infra "FACT 6").
NOTE: On 06/05/2007 at the open court, V.C. declared under oath that she and her husband did NOT need money from the trial (see infra "FACT-5", court transcript). However, after the trial was over, V.C. actually asked the court for a restitution.
I have no clue why Mrs. V.C. would claim publicly that her 3-year-old daughter "has been a victim" of me because I never touched the baby girl (during V.C.'s visit, V.C.'s daughter was only 3-month old) had been with V.C.'s husband not me -- Mr. Courtland had proved this fact (see evidence: Mr. Courtland's Statement about V.C.'s 2004 visit).
NOTE: On 06/05/2007 at the open court, V.C. declared under oath that she and her husband did NOT need money from the trial (see infra "FACT-5", court transcript). However, after the trial was over, V.C. actually asked the court for a restitution.
I have no clue why Mrs. V.C. would claim publicly that her 3-year-old daughter "has been a victim" of me because I never touched the baby girl (during V.C.'s visit, V.C.'s daughter was only 3-month old) had been with V.C.'s husband not me -- Mr. Courtland had proved this fact (see evidence: Mr. Courtland's Statement about V.C.'s 2004 visit).
M Y S T E R Y
Why would Mrs. Victoria Forester
Courtland make a false 'rape' claim
against me when she asking for a
restitution of $12,372.00 ?
Why would Mrs. Victoria Forester
Courtland make a false 'rape' claim
against me when she asking for a
restitution of $12,372.00 ?
B R E I E F I N G
On 06/04/2007 and 09/07/2007, V.C. disclosed her name to the public as: Victoria Forester, Victoria Forester Courtland. "V.C.") is the author of "A Visible Woman", a short fiction being published in 2002 "was about a young woman being stalked". (Citing V.C.'s statement, see infra FACT-2).
V.C. (AKA: Victoria Forester, ViVictoria Forester Courtland, became more famous after she disclosed her full name publicly and being acting as Washington State's witness against an innocent health care provider at the open courts on 06/04/2007, 06/05/2007 and 09/07/2007 (see FACT-C, infra).
V.C. was interested in writing my Acuvibra Therapy, the healing art that she had been benefited. After finishing writing of the short fiction A Visible Woman, V.C. came to my office in 2001, and asked me to have pictures with her. She told me that she was going to use our photos for her future book about my Acuvibra Therapy.
On 07/02/2002, I told V.C. the good news that I won over the 1998 false accusation made by a former female patient but I didn't tell her the accuser's name. V.C. wanted to add the story of my victory over the 1998 false accusation into her future book about me.
On 12/09/2004, V.C. flew to Seattle from the East Coast (with her 3-month-old daughter) to give her sister "physical support". She told me
On 12/15/2004, she came to my office to check the documents of K.R. who made the 1998 false claim against me. She paid $48 to purchase the contact information of K.R. (Note: K.R.'s retaliation letter dated 05/19/1998 was made after receiving of my 04/13/1998 letter in which I against her sex assault to me on 04/12/1998.)
On 12/17/2004, V.C. came to my office to check the documents of B.C., V.C. paid $48 to purchase the contact information of B.C. (Note: B.C. was my former patient (1990-1995) who introduced her daughter, daughter-in-law C.B., and best friend K.R. to see me, Later she became K.R.'s witness against me.)
On 12/21/2004 V.C. came to my office to purchase the information of C.B. V.C. paid $48 to purchase the contact information of C.B.(Note: Mrs. C.B. is B.C.'s daughter-in-law and was my former patient. Before K.R. asked Mrs. C.B. be her witness against me, C.B. had introduced her husband to see me; and they both had no complain. But after K.R. 'loaned' $10,000.00 to C.B.. Mrs. C.B. became K.R.'s witness against me).
On Mrs. V.C.'s 12/21/2004 visit, I refused V.C.'s two requests related to the book that she was going to write about me: One was asking me not allow Prof. Alexander J. Maxwell -- who was my English editor for my couple books -- to write my story (in 2001, I won over the 1998 malicious accusations of K.R.'s and her two friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s) because she was going to write; V.C. asked me to give her an exclusive right to write my story. Another was asking for my permission to use our 2001 photo which shows that she and me were shaking hands in front of my clinic sign. V.C. was angry.
On 06/06/2006, V.C. called the Seattle Police Department ("SPD") from the East Coast. She claimed that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her second treatment session for her uterine prolapse; She said that after the second treatment, she came out for a third treatment but not being assaulted. (Note: On 06/07/2006 at the trial court, SPD detective S. told the jury under oath that V.C. told her that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse when she saw me in December 2004.)
V.C. claimed that she had been suffering very painful uterine prolapse since her daughter's born in August 2004. In the 4 months (from August to December) before she saw me in December of 2004, V.C. never see a physician in the East Coast for the said pain and so-called uterine prolapse. She claimed that she would rather fly to Seattle to see me for treatment because she and me had a patient-doctor relationship.
At the 2007 trial, V.C. declared publicly that during her second visit in December of 2004, I 'inserted' my thumb into her vagina treating her (non-existing) uterine prolapse. She also said that after the second visit, she left my office without fare. So she would come out again. She said that her husband and father gave her a ride for a third visit but she did not She was not able to prove the crucial fact that she had the said uterine prolapse; and she can not prove the date of so-called my 2004 treatments to her.
Prosecutor asked V.C. why there being a 18-month of period elapse to make the report? V.C. said that she was afraid that I "would contact the law enforcement," and I "would kill" her.
At the 2007 trial, Prosecutor Ms. H. J. informed the trial Judge that State's witness V.C.'s statements were inconsistent (see FACT-9).
Upon the baseless accusations of V.C.'s, I was charged with second degree rape. (NOTE: The Police and Prosecutor's Office did not ask V.C. to prove the crucial fact that she had been diagnosed with uterine prolapse by any physicians when she saw me in December of 2004.)
V.C. has been no working since her daughter's born in 2004. According to V.C. husband's statement, during the 2007 trial period, they didn't have a house. In 2007, V.C. asked a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her travel, child care, and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting habit, etc. but was not proved by the Court.
V.C. (AKA: Victoria Forester, ViVictoria Forester Courtland, became more famous after she disclosed her full name publicly and being acting as Washington State's witness against an innocent health care provider at the open courts on 06/04/2007, 06/05/2007 and 09/07/2007 (see FACT-C, infra).
V.C. was interested in writing my Acuvibra Therapy, the healing art that she had been benefited. After finishing writing of the short fiction A Visible Woman, V.C. came to my office in 2001, and asked me to have pictures with her. She told me that she was going to use our photos for her future book about my Acuvibra Therapy.
On 07/02/2002, I told V.C. the good news that I won over the 1998 false accusation made by a former female patient but I didn't tell her the accuser's name. V.C. wanted to add the story of my victory over the 1998 false accusation into her future book about me.
On 12/09/2004, V.C. flew to Seattle from the East Coast (with her 3-month-old daughter) to give her sister "physical support". She told me
On 12/15/2004, she came to my office to check the documents of K.R. who made the 1998 false claim against me. She paid $48 to purchase the contact information of K.R. (Note: K.R.'s retaliation letter dated 05/19/1998 was made after receiving of my 04/13/1998 letter in which I against her sex assault to me on 04/12/1998.)
On 12/17/2004, V.C. came to my office to check the documents of B.C., V.C. paid $48 to purchase the contact information of B.C. (Note: B.C. was my former patient (1990-1995) who introduced her daughter, daughter-in-law C.B., and best friend K.R. to see me, Later she became K.R.'s witness against me.)
On 12/21/2004 V.C. came to my office to purchase the information of C.B. V.C. paid $48 to purchase the contact information of C.B.(Note: Mrs. C.B. is B.C.'s daughter-in-law and was my former patient. Before K.R. asked Mrs. C.B. be her witness against me, C.B. had introduced her husband to see me; and they both had no complain. But after K.R. 'loaned' $10,000.00 to C.B.. Mrs. C.B. became K.R.'s witness against me).
On Mrs. V.C.'s 12/21/2004 visit, I refused V.C.'s two requests related to the book that she was going to write about me: One was asking me not allow Prof. Alexander J. Maxwell -- who was my English editor for my couple books -- to write my story (in 2001, I won over the 1998 malicious accusations of K.R.'s and her two friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s) because she was going to write; V.C. asked me to give her an exclusive right to write my story. Another was asking for my permission to use our 2001 photo which shows that she and me were shaking hands in front of my clinic sign. V.C. was angry.
On 06/06/2006, V.C. called the Seattle Police Department ("SPD") from the East Coast. She claimed that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her second treatment session for her uterine prolapse; She said that after the second treatment, she came out for a third treatment but not being assaulted. (Note: On 06/07/2006 at the trial court, SPD detective S. told the jury under oath that V.C. told her that she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse when she saw me in December 2004.)
V.C. claimed that she had been suffering very painful uterine prolapse since her daughter's born in August 2004. In the 4 months (from August to December) before she saw me in December of 2004, V.C. never see a physician in the East Coast for the said pain and so-called uterine prolapse. She claimed that she would rather fly to Seattle to see me for treatment because she and me had a patient-doctor relationship.
At the 2007 trial, V.C. declared publicly that during her second visit in December of 2004, I 'inserted' my thumb into her vagina treating her (non-existing) uterine prolapse. She also said that after the second visit, she left my office without fare. So she would come out again. She said that her husband and father gave her a ride for a third visit but she did not She was not able to prove the crucial fact that she had the said uterine prolapse; and she can not prove the date of so-called my 2004 treatments to her.
Prosecutor asked V.C. why there being a 18-month of period elapse to make the report? V.C. said that she was afraid that I "would contact the law enforcement," and I "would kill" her.
At the 2007 trial, Prosecutor Ms. H. J. informed the trial Judge that State's witness V.C.'s statements were inconsistent (see FACT-9).
Upon the baseless accusations of V.C.'s, I was charged with second degree rape. (NOTE: The Police and Prosecutor's Office did not ask V.C. to prove the crucial fact that she had been diagnosed with uterine prolapse by any physicians when she saw me in December of 2004.)
V.C. has been no working since her daughter's born in 2004. According to V.C. husband's statement, during the 2007 trial period, they didn't have a house. In 2007, V.C. asked a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her travel, child care, and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting habit, etc. but was not proved by the Court.
After I being wrongfully convicted on 6/13/2007, the trial Judge received 30+ opposing letters from the society against the unfair trial. For example, Christine E. D., health care provider, wrote to the Judge, "I believe that allegations against Dr. Cheng must be invented for whatever reason by the two women who made them ... How could be convicted on the basis of two former patients who were seen by him decades apart? ... Please not allow a miscarriage of justice!" (See infra 'Anser 2' in Q & A section).
At the trial on 06/05/2007, she declared publicly, "I do like creating stories." (see below)
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
I'm Charlie Y. Cheng, a moral health care provider who had no criminal history before the false accusations created by Victoria Forester Courtland (AKA：Victoria Courtland, Victoria Forester, "V.C.") in 2006.
在受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。
在受到 V.C.的2006年诬告之前（详情介绍在后），我没有犯罪史。
Before the 9/7/2007 sentencing hearing, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court for cause No. 06-1-05678-3 (my case) received dozens of opposing letters in support of me because 'Mr. Cheng is not guilty' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) .
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
On 9/9/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for an alleged sex crime (that was created by Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland but I did not commit), Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
13 year ago in 2006, after making false report to the Seattle Police to hurt me, Victoria Forester Courtland became 'depressed' (see her statement to the open Court on September 7th, 2007, see infra).
In 2019, Mrs. Courtland finally made a correct decision in asking the Court "to stop restitution payment to her" (citing Prosecutor David Ryan's letter).
在13年前的2006年，V.C.博士向西雅图警方报了假案来陷害我之后，她得了忧郁症（请见下面刊出的她2007年9月7日在公开法庭上的自白）。
在2019年，她要求法庭终止我对她的赔款（见检察官David Ryan 给我的来信）。
In 2019, Mrs. Courtland finally made a correct decision in asking the Court "to stop restitution payment to her" (citing Prosecutor David Ryan's letter).
在13年前的2006年，V.C.博士向西雅图警方报了假案来陷害我之后，她得了忧郁症（请见下面刊出的她2007年9月7日在公开法庭上的自白）。
在2019年，她要求法庭终止我对她的赔款（见检察官David Ryan 给我的来信）。
On 6/13/2019, Prosecutor D. I. R. emailed me: "restitution payments to VC were terminated per attached order“ (see image FACT-A).
在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。
在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。
Below (FACT-B) is Prosecutor D. R.'s 6/13/2019 attachment, the "AGREED AMENDMENT TO ORDER SETTING RESTITUTION Dated 12/18/2007, TERMINATING PAYMENT TO V.C. (DOB ...)” signed by Judge Michael Ryan on 2/25/2019.
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
The Superior Court's 2/25/2019 Order was prepared by the Prosecutor upon Dr. Courtland's request, it states, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments. Therefore, restitution payment to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (see FACT-B below)
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见下面FACT-B)。
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见下面FACT-B)。
Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to participate in the 2007 trial had been documented in the official document of 9/7/2007 Washington State Superior court as asking for $12,372.00 (see evidence, infra).
VC博士出庭2007的动机是要求得到12万3百72美元的回报（见FACT-6, infra)。
VC博士出庭2007的动机是要求得到12万3百72美元的回报（见FACT-6, infra)。
Usually, a victim will feel relaxed after reporting a bad person to the Police because his/her stress being released. However, Dr. Courtland declared publicly at the 9/7/2007 Court, "After reporting Charlie Cheng to the Seattle Police I became so depressed ...” （see below transcript, lines 12-13). But, the Judge told Defense Lawyer Mr. Engelhard, "There is no evidence for it." (see below)
通常，受害人举报坏人后会感到心情轻松因为压力被减少了。但，VC博士在2007年9月7日的法庭上公开宣称：“自从我向西雅图警察局举报鄭先生之后，我心情变得诅丧 ..." （请见下面法院现场记录的第12-13行）。
通常，受害人举报坏人后会感到心情轻松因为压力被减少了。但，VC博士在2007年9月7日的法庭上公开宣称：“自从我向西雅图警察局举报鄭先生之后，我心情变得诅丧 ..." （请见下面法院现场记录的第12-13行）。
Note：V.C. spoke publicly (see above), "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape." But the Judge told Defense Lawyer Mr. Engelhard, "There is no evidence for it (postpartum depression)." Also, V.C. did not provide any evidence to prove her claim that she's being raped.
Regarding Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation to make the false 'sex assault' report, Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E.)
In order to get a restitution to cover up travel cost and to treat 3-year-old daughter's bad habit of biting nails, at the 9/7/2007 open Court, Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland created non-existing fact of 'RAPE‘ against me (see FACT-D below).
Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) knew how to create stories. At the 6/5/2007 Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland declared publicly, "I'm an intelligent person" , and "I did teach creating writing." (see FACT-1, below)
The most famous story created by Dr. Courtland
was that "following the rape." (see supra FACT-D).
The others see "Q & A" sections (infra).
was that "following the rape." (see supra FACT-D).
The others see "Q & A" sections (infra).
Regarding Dr. Courtland's stories, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen pointed out:
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）
Below are part of Mrs. Courtland's
inconsistent statements under oath.
inconsistent statements under oath.
On 9/7/2007 at the sentence court, V.C. disclosed the secret that she actually known the State's witness K.R. -- V.C. declared publicly, "I met previous victims to come forward again" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See supra "FACT-C") . NOTE: It was contracted to what V.C. testified at the 6/5/2007 court, where V.C. denied this crucial fact under oath that she was knowing K.R. (See infra "FACT-3" and “FACT-4”, the court's transcript)
On another side under oath, Dr. Courtland would give a contrary story that she did "not' know Kathryn R. (see fact 4 below).
Dr. Courtland's other inconsistent stories (e.g., regarding whether she really talked with an acupuncture about the non-existing alleged 2004 assault, on 12/21/2006 she told the Prosecutor that the acupuncturist was "Kimberly Hughes"; then, at the 2007 trial, she changed to "Priscilla Xu"), please see infra Q & A Section.
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
NOTE:
V.C.'s husband, Mr. Courtland's statement was that
Mrs. Courtland told him about the alleged 2004
touching after they back to the East Coast
(See FACT-14 in "Q 28" infra).
V.C.'s husband, Mr. Courtland's statement was that
Mrs. Courtland told him about the alleged 2004
touching after they back to the East Coast
(See FACT-14 in "Q 28" infra).
Regarding Victoria Forester's motivation, one side, at the 6/5/2007 open court, she said under oath, "we didn't need money” (see FACT-5 below).
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
On another side, at the 9/7/2007 Court, Dr. Courtland would make a 180-degree turn by asking a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her trip and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6 below).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
Note: even if Victoria Forester Courtland claimed that her daughter "has been a victim" of mine (see above lines 16-17 on FACT-6), 98% of her $12,372.00 of restitution demand was NOT granted by the Washington State Superior Court (supra).
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
At the 2007 public trial, Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) presented to the Jury a non-existing 'fact' under oath that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second treatment session' in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
In 2007, at the Washington State Superior Court, Mrs. Victoria Courtland made a false statement under oath to the public that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second' session of treating her uterine prolapse in December of 2004!
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
V.C.在宣誓下谎称她在2004年12月从美国东部飞到西雅图找我治疗子宫下垂。我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ ！有关我曾经治疗的肌肉痛，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，从来没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
V.C.在宣誓下谎称她在2004年12月从美国东部飞到西雅图找我治疗子宫下垂。我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ ！有关我曾经治疗的肌肉痛，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，从来没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
Regarding the issue of whether Dr. Courtland was seeing me in 2004 for treating her 'uterine prolapse," at the 6/7/2007 trial court, Seattle Police Detective Stangeland disclosed two secrets to the public: (1) Ms. Courtland was not see me for uterine prolapse, and (2) 'she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time' she saw me in 2004 (see below).
At the 2007 trial, under oath Dr. Courtland created a story that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her 'second' treatment session for her uterine prolapse in December, 2004.
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
Actually, V.C. had make a false report to the law enforcement (see Part B below); But,
she said under oath that she "was afraid to contact law enforcement' (see Part A below).
she said under oath that she "was afraid to contact law enforcement' (see Part A below).
At the 2007 trial, when V.C. was asked why did she wait 18-months long to make the alleged event? She gave two reasons
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her. (See FACT-G, infra)
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her. (See FACT-G, infra)
The fact that I forgive Dr. Victoria Forester Courtland (Victoria Forester) who created non-existing ‘sex assault’ to hurt me, has been documented in my 2017 book, "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness" with undeniable evidence (see below) .
关于我原谅V.C. 博士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
关于我原谅V.C. 博士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
Unfinished ... More coming soon!
网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q 1: Have you had a fair trial? 你有没有受到公平的审判？
No. I didn't have a fair trial. For example, my constitution right to have my own witness had been deprived by the trial Court (see Attorney Scott J. Engelhard's email dated 6/1/2007, below)
我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。
Q 2： What's your former female patients' response after you being convicted?
After I was wrongfully convicted, Judge Nicole Macinnes received many of opposing letters from my former female patients. Below is one of them.
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。
Q 3: Is it true that Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud (she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) met you in person at King County Jail, willing to assist your appeal?
That's true.
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
Q 4: On 6/5/2007, V.C. made a public claim that in December of 2004 you touched her sex organ to treat her uterine prolapse which was herr reason she saw you. Have you touch V.C.'s sex organ as a treatment?
Not All! Actually, V.C. knew the fact that my treatment does not touch sex organs. (see V.C.'s "Patient's Consent Form" dated 07/02/2002 in FACT_P below)
Q 5: What's the Count One charge against you?
The Count One charge was K.R.'s 1998 allegations of which the Department of Health has found any professional misconduct on my side (details see Kathy R.)
Q 6： After the appellate lawyer found that the 2007 conviction against you was the result of "the deceipt of these two women," why would you forgive them? 为什么在上诉律师发现、你冤判是‘两个撒谎的女子’的编造的，你却会原谅她们？
I forgive "these two women" upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony").
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
Q 7： How Had you been treating by the DOC (Department of Corrections) at the prison?
AI had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison.
I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
I'd like to give special thanks to: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
Q 8： Is Mr. Cheng's life in danger since he exposed this injustice case against him?
本冤案实情在网上公布后，你会受到生命威胁吗？
Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing bias and racialism！ 是存在这种危险性，因为偏见和种族主义的存在！
本冤案实情在网上公布后，你会受到生命威胁吗？
Yes, my life is facing danger after I exposed the truth that I was wrongfully convicted because of the existing bias and racialism！ 是存在这种危险性，因为偏见和种族主义的存在！
Q 9： Why would Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) make false claims to hurt you?
为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？
为什么 V.C. 要编谎话来陷害你？
Because of our conflict happened in the end of V.C.'s third visit -- I reject her demand for an exclusive right to write my story because Prof. Alex Maxwell (my English editor for my three books in English) also wanted to write my story. And, I did no allow V.C. to use the 2000-01 photo which showing she was shaking hands with me, in her book.
In the end of the third visit, Victoria Forester Courtland left my office very angry.
Q 10: What's V.C.'s recollection about the said second treatment session for her uterine prolapse?
She insisted that I treated her uterine prolapse in her seconded treatment session on 12/17/2007. And, she left my office without fair (see the transcript below).
She insisted that I treated her uterine prolapse in her seconded treatment session on 12/17/2007. And, she left my office without fair (see the transcript below).
11: Is it true that on 11/13/2001, the Department of Health (DOH) found that you were not guilty for K.R.'s 1998 complaint (the Count One charge against you in the 2006) ?
2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？
A10: Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.
2006年起诉书给你罗列的第一项‘罪名’ 完全是K.R. 1998年的诬告，卫生厅调查该诬告的结果后、发现你没违规，对吗？
A10: Yes！The fact that I was NOT GUILTY for K.R.'s and her two friends' 1998 complaints had been documented on the DOH's 11/23/2001 order below.
Unfinished ... More coming soon! 网站在编辑中，将会有更多精彩内容！
Q 12: When did you first met Victoria Forester-Coutland?
I knew Victoria Forester-Courtland since 1998. That time her name was "Victoria Forester". She was referred to me by her friend "Mitch" (see below), a psychologist who's a years-long client of me, because Victoria Forester felt down from a ladder and injured herself during a work.
Q 13: When was the last time V.C. was being treated by you?
It' was July 2nd of 2002. That time her name was not "Courtland" but "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester (see below). This is my evidence to prove the crucial fact that I did not treat V.C.'s uterine prolapse in her December-2004 visit.
It' was July 2nd of 2002. That time her name was not "Courtland" but "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester (see below). This is my evidence to prove the crucial fact that I did not treat V.C.'s uterine prolapse in her December-2004 visit.
Q 14: Is it true that on 06/07/2006 Victoria Forester Courtland told Detective Stangeland she had pictures taken with you, but at the 06/05/2007 trial, she denied under oath?
Yes, It's true!
Regarding whether V.C. had the copy of photography showing she and me together, V.C. had two opposite versions:
On June 7 of 2006, she told the Detective she had the picture (see FACT-Q below);
However, on June 7 of 2006, at the trial V.C. denied under oath (see FACT-R below);
Q 15: At the trial, Victoria Forester Courtland told the Jury that the reason she didn't see any physicians at the East Coast (where she lives) for her painful 'uterine prolapse', but rather waiting 3 more months to fly to Seattle (the West Coast) to see you, because she and you 'always' have a 'doctor and patient' relationship'. Do you and Dr. Courtland always have a doctor and patient relationship as she claimed?
No.
Q 16: Mrs. Courtland claimed that she was 'sex assaulted' by you in 2004. Why she did not report to the Police in 2004, but waited to June of 2006?
Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
Note: During the deposition held by Defense attorney Scott Engelhard and Prosecutor Heather Jensen on 12/01/2006, V.C. did not made above claim that the reason she was being waiting for 18 months long to call Seattle Police because she had "great fear" that I would "kill" her.
Q 17: V.C. claimed that in December of 2004 she saw you three times for treating her uterine prolapse, but she was not able to provide a diagnosis to prove her claim. What else she provided to the trial court as her exhibit to support her claim against you?
At the 2007 trial, the Prosecutor submitted V.C.'s 2-page Consolidated Statement for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005 (see "FACT-K" below) as their evidence. And, this is the only physical evidence she had to support her claims.
On the top line of the V.C.'s bank statement (below), it documented the fact that V.C. received 2-page Consolidated Statement on 02/11/2005, which were almost 14-months before she made the false report to the SPD on 06/06/2006.
Q 18: When was V.C.'s first visit of you in December of 2004?
According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1138, which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s first visit was 12/15/2004 (see FACT_L below),
Q 19: When was V.C.'s second visit of you in December of 2004?
According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1139, which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s second visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_M below),
Q 19: When was V.C.'s second visit of you in December of 2004?
According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1139, which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s second visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_M below),
Q 20: When was V.C.'s third visit of you in December of 2004?
According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1140, which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s third visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_N below),.
Q 20: When was V.C.'s third visit of you in December of 2004?
According to the date of V.C.'s check No. 1140, which the accuser did not present to the trial court nor showed to my attorney, see evidence, FACT_O, infra)， V.C.'s third visit was 12/17/2004 (see FACT_N below),.
Q 21: Did V.C. submit above-mentioned her three December-2004 checks to the trial court as her evidence to support her claim against you?
No. V.C. did NOT!
Because she only give the copy of her bank's "Consolidated Statement from 12/9/2004 to 1/10/2005" (see supra “FACT_K") but omitted above-mentioned her three checks (No. 1138, 1139 & 1140) which are crucial evidence to prove I was innocent for V.C.'s baseless claim, that's why my lawyer Mr. Engelhard had to issue a subpoena to her bank in the East Coast (see "FACT_O", infra).
Q 21: At the 2007 trial, Victoria Forester Courtland claimed under oath that you touched her sex organ. Is that part of your treatment?
No such things happened. The nature of my treatment had been documented in the Patient's Consent form (see FACT-P below).
Q 21: At the 2007 trial, Victoria Forester Courtland claimed under oath that you touched her sex organ. Is that part of your treatment?
No such things happened. The nature of my treatment had been documented in the Patient's Consent form (see FACT-P below).
Q 22: Did accusers K.R. and V.C. proved their accusations against you?
Not all!
The prosecution did not prove the following two crucial facts:
(1) I had been with accuser K.R. (count one accuser) during the alleged incident time -- after 7:00 p.m. on 04/12/1998, the Easter Sunday. (Note: K.R. fabricated a fact that she'd been sexually touched by me after 7:00 p.m. before 8:15 p.m. However, I had been with Mr. Taoyuan Wang's wife and two children after 6:30 p.m. in my office. see K.R.);
(2) I 'treated' V.C.'s non-existing uterine prolapse in December of 2004 (Note: V.C. fabricated a fact that I inserted my finger into her vagina treating her uterine prolapse in her second session. (Note: V.C. claimed that 4 days later, after the alleged second treatment, her father and husband drove her came out again for a third treatment, but she did NOT ask these two men to stay with her inside of my clinic. Details? see infra court transcripts.)
Q 23: Have you appealed?
On my sentence day, September 7th of 2007, my appellate attorney was presented.
I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014).
I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.
On my sentence day, September 7th of 2007, my appellate attorney was presented.
I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014).
I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.
Q 24: Had the Jury heard your testimony in your own English?
No.
Upon my defense attorney's request, my entire testimony at the 2007 trial was made in Mandarin Chinese, which was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter to translate Mandarin to English. In another word, the Jury only heard second hand testimony of mine.
No.
Upon my defense attorney's request, my entire testimony at the 2007 trial was made in Mandarin Chinese, which was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter to translate Mandarin to English. In another word, the Jury only heard second hand testimony of mine.
Q 25: Who was your court-appointed interpreter?
Marisa Hsu was my first court-appointed interpreter (see FACT-T, below).
Marisa Hsu was my first court-appointed interpreter (see FACT-T, below).
Q 26: Did Marisa Hsu translate your entire Mandarin testimony to the Jury in appropriate English?
Some of her translations are appropriate but some are not because Mrs. Hsu could not follow up what I had said to the Jury in my Mandarin Chinese, and she only understood part of my words in Maderin. (See FACT-U, below).
Some of her translations are appropriate but some are not because Mrs. Hsu could not follow up what I had said to the Jury in my Mandarin Chinese, and she only understood part of my words in Maderin. (See FACT-U, below).
Q 27: Were you satisfied with Marisa Hsu's translation?
No!
Because she added a non-existing fact that I used other method 'touched' female's breasts (see FACT-V below). Touching female's breasts is element of crime; As result, I was being wrongfully charged and sentenced.
No!
Because she added a non-existing fact that I used other method 'touched' female's breasts (see FACT-V below). Touching female's breasts is element of crime; As result, I was being wrongfully charged and sentenced.
Q 28: When and where did V.C. tell her husband about the non-existing '2004 touching'?
When was the first time V.C. told her husband about the non-existing December-2004 sex assault, it's an important factor to determine whether Victoria Forester Courtland's accusation was true or false.
V.C.'s sworn statement at the open court was: "I choice talk to him as soon after it happened as I could." (See supra VERSION-3). I.e., V.C. told her husband Matt when Matt was in Seattle when they stayed with her sister Susan's house.
However, according to Mr.'s Courtland's sworn statement below (FACT-14) V.C. did NOT telld him the non-existing '2004 touching' in Seattle. Mr. Courtland sait that he was informed when they back to their home in the East Coast (See FACT-14 below).
When was the first time V.C. told her husband about the non-existing December-2004 sex assault, it's an important factor to determine whether Victoria Forester Courtland's accusation was true or false.
V.C.'s sworn statement at the open court was: "I choice talk to him as soon after it happened as I could." (See supra VERSION-3). I.e., V.C. told her husband Matt when Matt was in Seattle when they stayed with her sister Susan's house.
However, according to Mr.'s Courtland's sworn statement below (FACT-14) V.C. did NOT telld him the non-existing '2004 touching' in Seattle. Mr. Courtland sait that he was informed when they back to their home in the East Coast (See FACT-14 below).
Q 29: Mrs. Courland asked a restitution of $12,372 intal. Had it been granted by the Court?
V.C.'s goal for the trial was to get "approximately $11,372, and anticipate spending at least another thousant" (see lines 4-11 in FACT-W below).
Unfortunately, 98 % of the restitution money Mrs. Courtland asked was not being proved by the Court. Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a 5-digit of restitution but was granted for 3-digit restitution. (See the 2-page Court's Order dated 12/13/2007 in FACT-W below).
V.C.'s goal for the trial was to get "approximately $11,372, and anticipate spending at least another thousant" (see lines 4-11 in FACT-W below).
Unfortunately, 98 % of the restitution money Mrs. Courtland asked was not being proved by the Court. Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a 5-digit of restitution but was granted for 3-digit restitution. (See the 2-page Court's Order dated 12/13/2007 in FACT-W below).
Q 30: Why didn't Victoria Forester Courtland tell her husband about the alleged 'second treatment session' as soon as it happened, but rather wait weeks -- until they flew back to their home in the East Coast?
At the open court, V.C. told the Jury that because she and her husband didn't have their own car and they didn't have a lot of private time (see FACT-15 below).
Under construction ... more coming soon
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
