I FORGIVE VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
FOR MAKING A FALSE REPORT TO THE POLICE
TO HURT INNOCENT CHARLIE Y. CHENG !
(Documentary / Memoir)
FOR MAKING A FALSE REPORT TO THE POLICE
TO HURT INNOCENT CHARLIE Y. CHENG !
(Documentary / Memoir)
Under Construction. 2020-11-28 14:25
T H A N K S TO A T T O R N E Y S :
Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！
Al Rinaldi, Spencer Hall, Scott J. Engelhard & Lenell Nassbaum
感谢我的律师 Al Rinaldi、Spencer Hall、Scott Engelhard和Nassbaum！
Thanks to Washington State Supreme Court Justice Sheryl G. MaCloud!
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！
感谢华州最高法院大法官 Sheryl G. MaCloud！
FACT: In February of 2019, Prosecutor D. R. informed me (Charlie Y. Cheng) in his undated letter (below): “Victoria Courtland has asked" the King County Prosecutor's Office "to ask the court to stop restitution payment to her."
上面是笔者在2019年2月收到检察官D.R. 的信。他说，检方将于2019年2月18日那天，根据V.C.女士（在2006年向警方谎报案情、向法庭要$12,312.00者）的请求，要求法院撤除她在2007年要我付她所谓的‘受害者赔款’的诉求。
THE BELATED 'APOLOGY' FROM
MRS. VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
MRS. VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
I had been asked by readers: Why does Mrs. Victoria Courtland (aka: "V.C.", Victoria Forester, Victoria Forester Courtland) ask the Court to issue an order "to stop restitution payment to her" after she read this website in 2015?
Why did V.C. say in 2007 that she need a restitution against Charlie Cheng - to treat her 3-year-old daughter's habit of biting nails - but she surrender it in 2019?
What was Mrs. Victoria Forester's public statement for the 2007 restitution?
Why Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland (“V.C.”) is not a victim?
When does Prosecutor Heather J. tell the trial Court that V.C.'s statements were not consistent?
When did the Court document V.C.'s public statement, "I do like create stories"?
...
Why did V.C. say in 2007 that she need a restitution against Charlie Cheng - to treat her 3-year-old daughter's habit of biting nails - but she surrender it in 2019?
What was Mrs. Victoria Forester's public statement for the 2007 restitution?
Why Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland (“V.C.”) is not a victim?
When does Prosecutor Heather J. tell the trial Court that V.C.'s statements were not consistent?
When did the Court document V.C.'s public statement, "I do like create stories"?
...
BELOW ARE THE UNDENIABLE FACTS ON THE RECORDS
According to the record, in order to get a $12,312.00 restitution she does not deserve, V.C. made numerous false claims publicly at the 09/07/2007 Court, such as her 3-year-old daughter was my "victim" even though I had never met her "3-year-old daughter". (Note: V.C.: said, "My three-year-old daughter ... modeled my biting habit, and has not been able to stop herself. I am now seeking treatment for her nervousness as she too has been a victim of this crime." See FACT-6 infra).
记录显示，诬告者V.C.为了从笔者身上诈取$12,312.00的‘所谓“受害者赔款“，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她公开宣称她的3岁女儿是所谓的受害人，原因是她的女儿模仿她咬指甲的习惯，她需要这笔钱来帮助女儿除掉这新养成的咬手指甲的习惯。（注：点击此处见V.C.的2007年9月7日公开的声明）
In June of 2015, I was informed by the Department of Corrections ("DOC") that Victoria Forester Courtland had read my website (this one) in which I stated that I would forgive Mrs. Victoria Courland upon GOD's instructions. ("If you forgive those who sin against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But if you refuse to forgive to forgive others, your Father will not forgive your sins." MATHEW 6:14-15).
I witnessed GOD's mercy and the power of forgiveness through the real story of V.C.' (Victoria F. Courtland)!
记录显示，诬告者V.C.为了从笔者身上诈取$12,312.00的‘所谓“受害者赔款“，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她公开宣称她的3岁女儿是所谓的受害人，原因是她的女儿模仿她咬指甲的习惯，她需要这笔钱来帮助女儿除掉这新养成的咬手指甲的习惯。（注：点击此处见V.C.的2007年9月7日公开的声明）
In June of 2015, I was informed by the Department of Corrections ("DOC") that Victoria Forester Courtland had read my website (this one) in which I stated that I would forgive Mrs. Victoria Courland upon GOD's instructions. ("If you forgive those who sin against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But if you refuse to forgive to forgive others, your Father will not forgive your sins." MATHEW 6:14-15).
I witnessed GOD's mercy and the power of forgiveness through the real story of V.C.' (Victoria F. Courtland)!
At the 09/07/2007 public Court, Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a $12,312.00 restitution (V.C. claimed that she and her 3-year-old daughter was my 'victims' even though that I had not been with V.C.'s daughter alone). See pages 6-11 of the Court-approved transcript dated 09/07/2007 .
Just after V.C.'s above public statement, Defense attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared at the same Court publicly, "Mr. Cheng is a fine fine human being." See page 14 of the 09/07/2007 court-approved transcript (below).
Just after V.C.'s above public statement, Defense attorney Scott J. Engelhard declared at the same Court publicly, "Mr. Cheng is a fine fine human being." See page 14 of the 09/07/2007 court-approved transcript (below).
Victoria Forester Courtland's motivation for making false allegations to the Seattle Police had been documented on pages 176-177 of the court-approved transcript dated 06/05/2007: At the 06/05/2007 open court, Defense attorney Scott Engelhard told the open Court that V.C.'s motivation was "making false allegations against Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E below.)
01
BRIEF OF V.C.'S 2007 RESTITUTION
& V.C.'S 2006 FALSE REPORT TO
THE SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BRIEF OF V.C.'S 2007 RESTITUTION
& V.C.'S 2006 FALSE REPORT TO
THE SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") is an "intelligent person." (See FACT-1, infra). Before she saw me on 12/19/1998, she had known the theory of Meridian - the principle of acupuncture, acupressure, Acu-vibra, and Chinese Medicine (See lines 19-25, cour-approved transcript dated 06/04/2007, FACT-63 below).
At V.'C.'s first visit on 12/19/1998 for her injury (see FACT-H infra) she had shown her interest in my 50 Q & A of Tui-Na (a well-known book related with Acu-vibra and Meridian healing that was published by Great Light publishing in 1981, Hong Kong), which was put into a frame and had been displayed on my clinic wall since 1989.
V.C. highly appraised my Acu-vibra treatment for injury as: "I feel like on that level he (Charlie Cheng) is like a healing force in my life" (see FACT-27).
Victoria Forester Courtland also said under oath, "He (Charlie Cheng) had been a trusted provider for seven years without ever touching me" (see FACT-28) ; "I had known him (Charlie Cheng) ... seven years without any inappropriate touch (see FACT-29 infra)". She wanted to write a book about me (infra).
In or around 2000, V.C. told me she's a writer (see below).
V.C. highly appraised my Acu-vibra treatment for injury as: "I feel like on that level he (Charlie Cheng) is like a healing force in my life" (see FACT-27).
Victoria Forester Courtland also said under oath, "He (Charlie Cheng) had been a trusted provider for seven years without ever touching me" (see FACT-28) ; "I had known him (Charlie Cheng) ... seven years without any inappropriate touch (see FACT-29 infra)". She wanted to write a book about me (infra).
In or around 2000, V.C. told me she's a writer (see below).
In the early 2000's - about 6 years before making a false report to the Seattle Police on 06/06/2006 - writer Victoria Forester Courtland (who published two fictions and a poem, see FACT-2 below) asked me to take pictures with her (see FACT-31 below) for her future book about my famous Acu-vibra, a healing art that had been reported by local newspapers in many languages, e.g., English, Vietnamese and Chinese (see FACT-63 supra).
Upon Victoria Courtland.'s request, I emailed her the following two photos on 04/13/2001.
Upon Victoria Courtland.'s request, I emailed her the following two photos on 04/13/2001.
On 07/02/2002 visit, V.C. found that I won over K.R.'s and her friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s malicious allegations when she signed the Patients Consent form (see FACT-65, infra) .
My victory over K.R.'s 1998 malicious accusations had been documented on the Department of Health ("DOH")'s 'STIPULATED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, AND AGREED ORDER" that was signed by Judge Eric B. S. on 11/13/2001 (see FACT-64 below).
My victory over K.R.'s 1998 malicious accusations had been documented on the Department of Health ("DOH")'s 'STIPULATED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, AND AGREED ORDER" that was signed by Judge Eric B. S. on 11/13/2001 (see FACT-64 below).
V.C. found above 6 pages of DOH's 11/13/2001 Order on DOH's website.
She wanted to add my 2001 victory story over K.R. and K.R.'s two friends (B.C. and C.B.) in her future book about me. Thus, in December of 2004 V.C. came to my office three times to check piles of 1998 documents; and, she purchased the 1998 accusers' information:
(1) On 12/15/2004 she checked pile of K.R.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase K.R.'s contact information. See infra FACT-L (V.C.'s check No. 1138. NOTE: On 09/07/2007, V.C. admitted the fact that she did contact K.R., see FACT-3, infra )
(2) On 12/17/2004 she checked pile of B.C.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase B.C.'s contact information. See infra FACT-M (V.C.'s check No. 1139. NOTE: B.C. referred her daughter-in-law C.B. and daughter T. to see me in 1994, they had no complaint; then referred K.R. to see me in 1997.)
(3) On 12/21/2004 she checked pile of C.B.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase C.B.'s contact information. See infra FACT-N (V.C.'s check No. 1149. NOTE: In or around 1998, K.R. 'loaned' C.B. $10,000, then C.B. claimed that she corroborated K.R.'s false accusations.)
NOTE: Victoria Forester Courtland hided the copies of above-mentioned three checks which is the key evidence to prove I was not quilty for V.C.'s false accusations, from the Detective and the Prosecutor's Office.
That's why during Detective D.S.'s interview, in the joined interview by Defense attorney S.E. and Prosecutor H. J. , and at the 2007 trial, Mrs. Courtland repeatedly said that she did NOT remember on which day she had been sexually touched by me.
And, that's why at the 2007 trial, when the defendant's lawyer presented V.C.'s three checks as Defendant's evidence to the public court, prosecutor Ms. Jensen was surprised. See FACT-0, infra.
She wanted to add my 2001 victory story over K.R. and K.R.'s two friends (B.C. and C.B.) in her future book about me. Thus, in December of 2004 V.C. came to my office three times to check piles of 1998 documents; and, she purchased the 1998 accusers' information:
(1) On 12/15/2004 she checked pile of K.R.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase K.R.'s contact information. See infra FACT-L (V.C.'s check No. 1138. NOTE: On 09/07/2007, V.C. admitted the fact that she did contact K.R., see FACT-3, infra )
(2) On 12/17/2004 she checked pile of B.C.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase B.C.'s contact information. See infra FACT-M (V.C.'s check No. 1139. NOTE: B.C. referred her daughter-in-law C.B. and daughter T. to see me in 1994, they had no complaint; then referred K.R. to see me in 1997.)
(3) On 12/21/2004 she checked pile of C.B.'s 1998 files and paid $48 to purchase C.B.'s contact information. See infra FACT-N (V.C.'s check No. 1149. NOTE: In or around 1998, K.R. 'loaned' C.B. $10,000, then C.B. claimed that she corroborated K.R.'s false accusations.)
NOTE: Victoria Forester Courtland hided the copies of above-mentioned three checks which is the key evidence to prove I was not quilty for V.C.'s false accusations, from the Detective and the Prosecutor's Office.
That's why during Detective D.S.'s interview, in the joined interview by Defense attorney S.E. and Prosecutor H. J. , and at the 2007 trial, Mrs. Courtland repeatedly said that she did NOT remember on which day she had been sexually touched by me.
And, that's why at the 2007 trial, when the defendant's lawyer presented V.C.'s three checks as Defendant's evidence to the public court, prosecutor Ms. Jensen was surprised. See FACT-0, infra.
On 12/21/2004, I REJECTED Victoria Forester Courtland's two (2) requests (to use our photos taken in 2000 showing that she and I shaking hands with smiling in front of my clinic sign [see FACT-31 infra]; and she asked me to give her the exclusive right to write my story about my victory over K.R.'s and her friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s 1998 malicious allegations because she'd learned that retired English professor Alexander J. Maxwell was going to write the same story. (NOTE: Prof. Maxwell was my English editor for three of my books in English. He testified at the 2007 trial Court as my witness against V.C.'s false accusation.)
According to the public statement of Ms. Allen, the legal advocate manager for KCSARC (King County Sexual Assault Resource Center), on 07/22/2005 V.C. called the KCSARC from the East Coast in asking how to make a sexual assault report against a healthcare provider (see FACT-48 infra). Victoria Forester Courtland was encouraged to call the Seattle Police, but she did NOT take an action in 2005. Ms. Allen closed V.C.'s case (see FACT-17 infra) because of the fact that V.C. asked Ms. Allen whether the KCSARC received other complaint against me; when Ms. Allen called back after she checked with the Seattle Police Department, V.C. did not response to Ms. Allen.
NOTE: Prosecutor Ms. Jensen told the Court that "Ms. Courtland with her reports to KCSARC (King County Sex Assault Resource Center), which is not exactly consistent with that she has said during her interview." See FACT-53 below.
According to the public statement of Ms. Allen, the legal advocate manager for KCSARC (King County Sexual Assault Resource Center), on 07/22/2005 V.C. called the KCSARC from the East Coast in asking how to make a sexual assault report against a healthcare provider (see FACT-48 infra). Victoria Forester Courtland was encouraged to call the Seattle Police, but she did NOT take an action in 2005. Ms. Allen closed V.C.'s case (see FACT-17 infra) because of the fact that V.C. asked Ms. Allen whether the KCSARC received other complaint against me; when Ms. Allen called back after she checked with the Seattle Police Department, V.C. did not response to Ms. Allen.
NOTE: Prosecutor Ms. Jensen told the Court that "Ms. Courtland with her reports to KCSARC (King County Sex Assault Resource Center), which is not exactly consistent with that she has said during her interview." See FACT-53 below.
On 06/06/2006 - one and a year half after my rejection to V.C.'s two requests on 12/21/2004 - Victoria Forester Courtland suddenly made a FALSE sexual assault report to the Seattle Police: According to V.C., her December-2004 trip from the East Coast to Seattle was to assist her sister's birth (see FACT-62 infra). But V.C. claimed that in December of 2004, she saw me three times for her (non-existing) uterine prolapse.
V.C. reported the so-called 2004 incidents, but she claimed that she didn't remember the date (she only claimed that it was on her second visit in December of 2004),
NOTE: I was charged with 'second-degree rape', a crime I did not commit, because V.C. claimed that I 'inserted' my thumb into her vagina to treat her 'uterine prolapse' in December of 2004.
On 06/07/2007, Detective Ms. Stangeland told the Court that when V.C. saw me in December of 2004, V.C. had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse (see FACT-51 below).
V.C. reported the so-called 2004 incidents, but she claimed that she didn't remember the date (she only claimed that it was on her second visit in December of 2004),
NOTE: I was charged with 'second-degree rape', a crime I did not commit, because V.C. claimed that I 'inserted' my thumb into her vagina to treat her 'uterine prolapse' in December of 2004.
On 06/07/2007, Detective Ms. Stangeland told the Court that when V.C. saw me in December of 2004, V.C. had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse (see FACT-51 below).
Regarding alleged uterine prolapse, Victoria Forester Courtland provided three versions: (1) She knew the urine prolapse 'immediately' after her daughter was born in August of 2004 (see FACT-57 infra); (2) She did not knew she had the urine prolapse after her daughter was born (see FACT-58, infra); (3) She had the urine prolapse after her son was born on 03/14/2005 (see FACT-61, infra).
On 09/07/2007 at the public Court, Victoria Forester Courtland disclosed the secret that she had contacted State's witness K.R.
On 09/07/2007, V.C. asked the Superior Court of Washington State for a $12,372.00 restitution against me -- according to V.C., she need this money to cover up her cost of air fair, baby care and to treat her 3-year-old baby girl's bad habit of biting nails, etc. (see V.C.'s public statement dated 09/07/2007).
Before the 09/07/2007 sentence hearing, the trial Judge received 31 letters from the public opposed the 2007 miscarriage of justice in the State of Washington (see FACT-26 infra).
In 2015, after I finished the 7-year jail time for an alleged sex crime I did not commit, I established this website TELLING THE TRUTH with my full name, www.CharlieYCheng.com, in which I proved the fact with undeniable evidence that I'm an innocent prisoner; and, I also gave the reason why I would forgive Victoria Forester Courtland's false accusation against innocent me for her own gain because of GOD's teaching.
In 2019, which is 12 years after V.C.s 09/07/2007 restitution request and 4 years after reading my website, Victoria Forester Courtland surrendered the restitution against me (see FACT-A below) which she's not deserve.
On 09/07/2007, V.C. asked the Superior Court of Washington State for a $12,372.00 restitution against me -- according to V.C., she need this money to cover up her cost of air fair, baby care and to treat her 3-year-old baby girl's bad habit of biting nails, etc. (see V.C.'s public statement dated 09/07/2007).
Before the 09/07/2007 sentence hearing, the trial Judge received 31 letters from the public opposed the 2007 miscarriage of justice in the State of Washington (see FACT-26 infra).
In 2015, after I finished the 7-year jail time for an alleged sex crime I did not commit, I established this website TELLING THE TRUTH with my full name, www.CharlieYCheng.com, in which I proved the fact with undeniable evidence that I'm an innocent prisoner; and, I also gave the reason why I would forgive Victoria Forester Courtland's false accusation against innocent me for her own gain because of GOD's teaching.
In 2019, which is 12 years after V.C.s 09/07/2007 restitution request and 4 years after reading my website, Victoria Forester Courtland surrendered the restitution against me (see FACT-A below) which she's not deserve.
On 06/13/2019, Prosecutor D. I. R. emailed the Court's ORDER upon V.C.'s petition. It reads as: "restitution payments to VC were terminated per attached order“ (see image FACT-A below).
在2019年6月13日，检察官来电邮通知我、有关V.C.博士2007年赔偿费的最新决议：”根据附件所示，VC的赔偿费已被要求终止“，（下图 FACT-A）。
Below (FACT-B) is Prosecutor D. R.'s 6/13/2019 attachment, the "AGREED AMENDMENT TO ORDER SETTING RESTITUTION Dated 12/18/2007, TERMINATING PAYMENT TO V.C. (DOB ...)” signed by Judge Michael Ryan on 2/25/2019.
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
他说的 ”附件“ ，是华盛顿州法官在2019年2月25日签署的下面命令（见下图 FACT-B）。
02
I DID I NOT FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND FOR
HER MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS TO HURT
MY GOOD REPUTATION, BUT WOULD
FORGAVE V.C. UPON GOD'S TEACHING.
I DID I NOT FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND FOR
HER MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS TO HURT
MY GOOD REPUTATION, BUT WOULD
FORGAVE V.C. UPON GOD'S TEACHING.
Although in 2006 Mrs. V.C. (Victoria Forester Courtland) made a false report from the East Coast to the Seattle Police Department to hurt me for her own gain, I did not file a lawsuit against V.C., but forgave her upon God's teaching (If you forgive those who sin against you, your heavenly Father will forgive you. But if you refuse to forgive to forgive others, your Father will not forgive your sins." MATHEW 6:14-15) .
In 2015, I published this online memoir with undeniable evidences on this website -- www.CharlieYCheng.com -- to forgive Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland. In June of 2015 (five years ago), V.C. called the DOC (Department of Corrections of Washington) and told them that she had read my evidence being posted on this website, but she did NOT object to my evidence.
Two years later after V.C. reading my website (this one), in 2017, I published following book "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness" (ISBN 978-1-5136-2440-2) with undeniable evidence (see below) to forgive Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) who made false allegations against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng for her own gains (details see infra).
关于我原谅V.C. 女士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
In 2015, I published this online memoir with undeniable evidences on this website -- www.CharlieYCheng.com -- to forgive Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland. In June of 2015 (five years ago), V.C. called the DOC (Department of Corrections of Washington) and told them that she had read my evidence being posted on this website, but she did NOT object to my evidence.
Two years later after V.C. reading my website (this one), in 2017, I published following book "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Forgiveness" (ISBN 978-1-5136-2440-2) with undeniable evidence (see below) to forgive Victoria Forester Courtland (V.C.) who made false allegations against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng for her own gains (details see infra).
关于我原谅V.C. 女士谎编故事来陷害我的事实，已被记载在本人2007年出版的《要饶恕：一位无辜囚犯的见证》的回忆录中（见下）。
03
IS IT TRUE THAT VICTORIA FORESTER
COURTLAND'S DECEMBER-2004 VISIT
SEATTLE WAS GVING A PHYSICAL SUPPORT
TO ASSIST HER SISTER WITH HER BIRTH?
IS IT TRUE THAT VICTORIA FORESTER
COURTLAND'S DECEMBER-2004 VISIT
SEATTLE WAS GVING A PHYSICAL SUPPORT
TO ASSIST HER SISTER WITH HER BIRTH?
Yes, that's true.
According to the court-approved transcript dated 06/05/2007, V.C. said that her goal to Seattle from the East Coast was "to assist my sister with her birth." See FACT-62 below.
According to the court-approved transcript dated 06/05/2007, V.C. said that her goal to Seattle from the East Coast was "to assist my sister with her birth." See FACT-62 below.
Regarding V.C.'s physical support 'to assist' her sister with her birth, at the 2007 public court, Susan Forester Goodall (V.C.'s sister) said, "Labor support. Like pressure point on one's back, or squeezing hips," etc. (see SG-02).
04
"THIS IS REAL.
MR. CHENG IS NOT GUILTY."
WHEN, WHERE AND TO WHOM DID
DEFENSE ATTORNEY DECLARE?
"THIS IS REAL.
MR. CHENG IS NOT GUILTY."
WHEN, WHERE AND TO WHOM DID
DEFENSE ATTORNEY DECLARE?
Before the 9/7/2007 sentencing hearing, the trial Judge of the Washington State Superior Court for cause No. 06-1-05678-3 (my case) received dozens of opposing letters supporting of me because 'Mr. Cheng is not guilty' (quoted from defense lawyer Scott J. Engelhard, see below) .
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
当我在2007年被陪审团误判后，庭审法官收到了大量反对误判的信件。因为我“是无罪的" （摘自辩护律师 Scott Engelhard在法庭上的话语，见下面）。
05
WHAT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FACT FINDING?
WHAT'S APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S FACT FINDING?
On 09/09/2008, a year later after I being wrongfully convicted for the non-existing sex crime , Ms. Nussbaum, one of super appellate lawyers, wrote me:
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see FACT-52 below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
"You are an innocent man wrongfully caught up in the craziness and deceipt of these two women through no doing of your own ... the trial judge made errors in your trial." （see FACT-52 below)
在我被冤判入狱后的第二年，华州一位著名的上诉律师写给我：“你（笔者）是位无辜者，被两位说谎的女人编的故事栽赃... 我认为庭审法官也有错。” （下面是上诉律师原信的有关部分)
06
WHAT ARE CHARLIE CHENG'S
FEMALE PATIENTS' FEEDBACK?
WHAT ARE CHARLIE CHENG'S
FEMALE PATIENTS' FEEDBACK?
After I was wrongfully convicted by the Jury which did not see my key evidence (my 04/13/1998 letter to K.R. to cancel her and her husband's treatment appointments because I was sexually assaulted by K.R. on 04/12/1998) , the trial Judge received 31 letters from American society to support me (see FACT-26 below).
Kerri F. wrote to Judge Nicole MacInnes : "I saw Dr. Cheng over 20 times for treatment. There was NEVER a time during my treatment visits with Dr. Cheng that I felt at all uncomfortable, threatened, or even hesitant in seeing him. ... I was never naked and there was NEVER any inappropriate touch or talk that transpired during any visit ... He was a very nice, polite, sweet person and treated me with utmost professional." (see below)
Bonnie F. wrote to Judge Nicole MacInnes : "I received between 75 or 100 more treatment sessions AlONE with Mr. Cheng in his office over ten years," "and was never asked to remove any clothing or was never made to feel uncomfortable any way and especially not in any sexual way ever."
07
WHY DOES VICTORIA COURTLAND (“V.C.")
WANT TO WRITE A BOOK ABOUT CHARLIE CHENG?
WHY DOES VICTORIA COURTLAND (“V.C.")
WANT TO WRITE A BOOK ABOUT CHARLIE CHENG?
V.C. referred me to her sister Susan Forester Goodall and friend Ms. K. O'Connel. V.C. described me as: "He had been a trusted provider for seven years without ever touching me" (see FACT-28 infra); "I had known him for so many years, seven years, without any inappropriate touch" (see FACT-29 infra),
Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") said under oath, "I feel like on that level he (Charlie Cheng) is a healing force in my life." (see FACT-27 below)
V.C. also said publicly at the 06/05/2007 open Court that I "had been a trusted provider" of her "for seven years without ever touching" her (see FACT-28 below).
Victoria Forester Courtland repeated again that she had known me for "seven years", and during the "seven years", there was no "any inappropriate touch" from me. (See FACT-29 below.)
08
WHEN DID "VICTORIA COURTLAND"
BEC0ME A PUBLIC FIGURE?
"Victoria Courtland" (AKA: "V.C.", Victoria Forester Courtland, Victoria Forester)" became a public figure since she disclosed her name voluntarily at the public court on June 4, 2007, and being a State's witness at the open court against innocent Charlie Y. Cheng.
NOTE: The name of "Victoria Forester Courtland" ("V.C.") also had been disclosed to the public in 2007 by V.C.'s sister Susan and V.C.'s husband Matt at the Washington State Superior Court.
Mr. Courtland said under oath, "Her name became Victoria Ann Forester Courtland." (see MATT-01 below)
Mr. Courtland said under oath, "Her name became Victoria Ann Forester Courtland." (see MATT-01 below)
09
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
TEACH CREATING WRITING IN COLLEGE?
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
TEACH CREATING WRITING IN COLLEGE?
At the 6/5/2007 Washington State Superior Court, Victoria Forester Courtland declared publicly, "I'm an intelligent person" , and "I did teach creating writing." (see FACT-1, below)
10
WHAT ARE VICTORIA FORESTTER
COURTLAND'S PUBLICATIONS
BEING PUBLISHED BEFORE 2002?
WHAT ARE VICTORIA FORESTTER
COURTLAND'S PUBLICATIONS
BEING PUBLISHED BEFORE 2002?
Victoria Forester Courtland told me that she was a writer. At the trial on 06/05/2007 she told the Court that she had published a poem and two fictions before 2007 (see FACT-2 below).
According to Victoria Courtland's public statements, her book/fiction "THE VISIBLE WOMAN" which being published in 2000 or 2001 (see FACT-2 above) was about a man 'squeezing the flesh' of a woman's "breasts" (see FACT-2a below).
NOTE: According to Victoria Forester Courtland, her 2000-2001 fiction The Visible Woman which was "about women experiencing night terrors" (see above transcript, lines 24-25) and 'domestic violence' (see above transcript lines 7-8), i.e., before 2001, V.C. had known that the act that this man grabbing a woman's breasts was 'domestic violence."
11
HOW DID V.C.'s HUSBAND INTRODUCE
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND TO THE PUBLIC?
HOW DID V.C.'s HUSBAND INTRODUCE
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND TO THE PUBLIC?
On 06/05/2007 at the public Court, Mr. Courtland talked about her wife Victoria Forester Courtland as: "Typically she is not afraid to her mind." (See the lower part in MATT-08 below).
NOTE: According to Mr. Courtland's above public statement, his wife "V.C." is a person who "is not afraid to speak her mind." V.C. (who claimed that she's being sexually assaulted by me in a 2004 treatment session for her 'uterine prolapse') didn't make a report to the police in 2004, but rather waited until June 2006.
12
WHAT'S THE JUDGE'S OPINION REGARDING
V.C.'S BASELESS CLAIM THAT SHE "HAD
POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION"?
V.C.'S BASELESS CLAIM THAT SHE "HAD
POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION"?
At the open Court on 09/07/2007, V.C. asked the Washington State Superior Court for a restitution of $12,372.00 to cover up her expense of travel, child care and to give a treatment to stop her 3-years-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6, infra), on 09/07/2007, V.C. made a baseless 'rape' claim to the public as: "I was diagnosed with depression and posttraumatic stress disorder following the rape" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
Regarding the so-called diagnoses, Judge N. M. said at her court before, "We have no evidence of it." (Citing page 178 of court's 06/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
Regarding the so-called diagnoses, Judge N. M. said at her court before, "We have no evidence of it." (Citing page 178 of court's 06/07/2007 transcript. See FACT-C below).
13
WHEN DID V.C. MAKE A FALSE CLAIM PUBLICLY
THAT HER 3-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER
"HAD BEEN A VICTIM" OF CHARLIE CHENG?
WHEN DID V.C. MAKE A FALSE CLAIM PUBLICLY
THAT HER 3-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER
"HAD BEEN A VICTIM" OF CHARLIE CHENG?
On September 7th of 2007 at the Washington State Superior Court, inorder to get a $12,372 of restitution V.C. claimed (via a letter being read to the public), "In the months preceding the the trial I was so fearful of facing the perpetrator again that I began biting my nails. ... my three year old daughter was deeply affected by my anxiety modeled my biting habit, and has not been able to stop herself. I am now seeking treatment for her nervousness as she too has been a victim of this crime. ... I want the court to order Charlie Cheng to pay restitution ... I spent approximately $11,372 ... and anticipate to spend another thousand ... " (quoting V.C.'s 09/07/2007 public statements. See infra "FACT-6").
NOTE: I have no clue why Mrs. V.C. would claim publicly that her 3-year-old daughter "has been a victim" of me because I never contacted the baby girl (during V.C.'s 2004 visit, her daughter was only 3-month old). According to V.C.'s husband's 06/05/2007 public statement under oath, during V.C.'s 2004 visit, he had been taking care their 3-months-old daguthrer (see evidence: Mr. Courtland's Statement about V.C.'s 2004 visit).
NOTE: I have no clue why Mrs. V.C. would claim publicly that her 3-year-old daughter "has been a victim" of me because I never contacted the baby girl (during V.C.'s 2004 visit, her daughter was only 3-month old). According to V.C.'s husband's 06/05/2007 public statement under oath, during V.C.'s 2004 visit, he had been taking care their 3-months-old daguthrer (see evidence: Mr. Courtland's Statement about V.C.'s 2004 visit).
14
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
SAY THAT "I DO LIKE CREATING STORIES"?
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
SAY THAT "I DO LIKE CREATING STORIES"?
At the trial on 06/05/2007, she declared publicly, "I do like creating stories." (see below)
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
在法庭上，V.C. 宣称：”我喜欢编故事" （见下面）。
In 2005, in the "three months" before calling the KCSARC, Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland created the non-existing 2004 sexual assault story to her sister SUSAN GOODALL (see FACT-35 below).
NOTE：
Victoria Forester Courtland's passion of 'creating stories"
has been documented in the Court's 09/07/2007 official transcript.
Victoria Forester Courtland's passion of 'creating stories"
has been documented in the Court's 09/07/2007 official transcript.
15
WHEN DID V.C. DECLARE THAT
"AFTER REPORTED CHARLIE CHENG TO THE
SEATTLE POLICE I BECAME SO DEPRESSED"?
WHEN DID V.C. DECLARE THAT
"AFTER REPORTED CHARLIE CHENG TO THE
SEATTLE POLICE I BECAME SO DEPRESSED"?
Victoria Forester Coourtland stated 09/07/2007, "After reporting Charlie Cheng to the Seattle Police, I became so depressed." (See lines 12-13).
16
WHAT WAS VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
"MOTIVATION FOR MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS?
WHAT WAS VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
"MOTIVATION FOR MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS?
Scott J. Engelhard, defense attorney, informed the open Court, “my explanation as to her motivation for making false allegations against Mr. Cheng." (See FACT-E below)
17
WHEN DID THE PROSECUTOR TELL THE
COURT THAT VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
STATEMENTS WERE INCONSISTENT?
WHEN DID THE PROSECUTOR TELL THE
COURT THAT VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
STATEMENTS WERE INCONSISTENT?
Regarding Dr. Courtland's stories, Prosecutor Ms. Jensen pointed out:
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）
"Ms. Courtland with her report ... is not exactly consistent with what she has said during her interviews. There's something that's going to wheedle away her case, and the strenth of the State's case." (See below FACT-9)
关于如何评价VC博士编的故事，检查官Jensen说：“Courtland 女士在我们取证时的所讲,与她向KCSARC 机构的报案，有很大的出入。这将影响到我们的诉讼和消弱政府的这个案子。”（见下面FACT-9的法庭记录。）
18
WHAT ARE VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
INCONSISTENT CLAIMS TO THE PUBLIC?
WHAT ARE VICTORIA F. COURTLAND'S
INCONSISTENT CLAIMS TO THE PUBLIC?
According to the official transcripts, there are many V.C.'s inconsistent statements. Below are some examples:
On 9/7/2007 at the sentence court, V.C. disclosed the secret that she actually known the State's witness K.R. -- V.C. declared publicly, "I met previous victims to come forward again" (citing page 7 of court's 09/07/2007 transcript. See supra "FACT-C", or see V.C.'s full statement of 09/07/2007) . NOTE: It was contracted to what V.C. testified at the 6/5/2007 court, where V.C. denied this crucial fact under oath that she was knowing K.R. (See infra "FACT-3" and “FACT-4”, the court's transcript)
On another side under oath, Dr. Courtland would give a contrary story that she did "not' know Kathryn R. (see fact 4 below).
Mrs. Courtland's other inconsistent stories (e.g., regarding whether she really talked with an acupuncture about the non-existing alleged 2004 assault, on 12/21/2006 she told the Prosecutor that the acupuncturist was "Kimberly Hughes"; then, at the 2007 trial, she changed to "Priscilla Xu"), please see infra Q & A Section.
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
有关V.C.的其它前后不一的证词（比如，关于她是否有将她编造的2004受性性骚扰一事告诉过给针灸师，在2006年12月21日她告诉检方的，与她在2007年法庭上所讲的不一样），请看下面的<问与答>部分）。
NOTE:
V.C.'s husband, Mr. Courtland's statement was that
Mrs. Courtland told him about the alleged 2004
touching after they back to the East Coast
(See FACT-14 in "Q 28" infra).
V.C.'s husband, Mr. Courtland's statement was that
Mrs. Courtland told him about the alleged 2004
touching after they back to the East Coast
(See FACT-14 in "Q 28" infra).
Regarding Victoria Forester's motivation, one side, at the 6/5/2007 open court, she said under oath, "we didn't need money” (see FACT-5 below).
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
有关VC博士谎编的动机，一方面，在2007年6月5日的法庭上她宣誓称：“我不是为钱而来“（见FACT-5）。
On another side, at the 9/7/2007 Court, Dr. Courtland would make a 180-degree turn by asking a $12,372.00 of restitution to cover up her trip and to treat her 3-year-old daughter's biting nail habit (see FACT-6 below).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
另一方面，在2007年9月7日的法庭上，她却张口要1万2千3百72，说是要用来支付她的机票费、和用来给她3岁的女儿治疗咬手指甲的贵习惯用（见下面的FACT-6).
Note: even if Victoria Forester Courtland claimed that her daughter "has been a victim" of mine (see above lines 16-17 on FACT-6), 98% of her $12,372.00 of restitution demand was NOT granted by the Washington State Superior Court (supra, or see V.C.'s full statement of 09/07/2007).
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
值得一提的是，即使是她声称，她三岁的女儿也是我的’受害者‘（见上面事实FACT-6的第16-17行），她所诉求的$12,372.00赔偿费的98%都被法庭拒绝了.
At the 2007 public trial, Dr. Courtland (Victoria Forester) presented to the Jury a non-existing 'fact' under oath that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second treatment session' in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
In order to convince the Jury to believe the story, Dr. Courtland told the Jury that she had talked with an acupuncturist, PRISCILLA XU (see Part B of Court transcript below). It was contrary to her pre-trial interview, in which she said the acupuncturist was 'KIMBERLY HUGHES.' (see Part A of Court transcript below).
Notably, neither 'Kimberly Hughes' nor 'Priscilla Xu' had submitted affidavit to support Dr. Courtland's claims.
NOTE:
At the 2007 public trial, the Prosecutor's Office didn't
ask V.C. to provide evidence to support her claim
that ("went to see acupunctrist Priscilia Xu) was legitimate.
At the 2007 public trial, the Prosecutor's Office didn't
ask V.C. to provide evidence to support her claim
that ("went to see acupunctrist Priscilia Xu) was legitimate.
19
DID CHARLIE CHENG TREAT VICTORIA F.
COURTLAND'S UTERINE PROLAPSE IN 2004?
DID CHARLIE CHENG TREAT VICTORIA F.
COURTLAND'S UTERINE PROLAPSE IN 2004?
In 2007, at the Washington State Superior Court, Mrs. Victoria Courtland made a false statement under oath to the public that she's being sexually assaulted by me during the 'second' session of treating her uterine prolapse in December of 2004!
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
V.C.在宣誓下谎称她在2004年12月从美国东部飞到西雅图找我治疗子宫下垂。我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ ！有关我曾经治疗的肌肉痛，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，从来没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
I don't treat uterine prolapse!
This fact being documented in the old photos of my clinic sign and vehicle (see below).
V.C.在宣誓下谎称她在2004年12月从美国东部飞到西雅图找我治疗子宫下垂。我从来不治疗‘子宫下垂’ ！有关我曾经治疗的肌肉痛，在我以前诊所招牌和车身上已有写出，从来没有讲治疗妇科（见下图）。
20
WHEN DID DETECTIVE MS. STRANGELAND
DISPROVE V.C.'S BASELESS CLAIM THAT SHE
SAW CHARLIE CHENG FOR "UTERINE PROLAPSSE"?
WHEN DID DETECTIVE MS. STRANGELAND
DISPROVE V.C.'S BASELESS CLAIM THAT SHE
SAW CHARLIE CHENG FOR "UTERINE PROLAPSSE"?
Regarding the issue of whether Dr. Courtland was seeing me in 2004 for treating her 'uterine prolapse," at the 6/7/2007 trial court, Seattle Police Detective Stangeland disclosed two secrets to the public: (1) Ms. Courtland was not see me for uterine prolapse, and (2) 'she had not been diagnosed with uterine prolapse at the time' she saw me in 2004 (see FACT-59 below).
21
WHAT DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND'S
HUSBAND SAY ABOUT CHARLIE CHENG?
WHAT DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND'S
HUSBAND SAY ABOUT CHARLIE CHENG?
22
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND OR HER
HUSBAND LIE AT THE COURT UNDER OATH?
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND OR HER
HUSBAND LIE AT THE COURT UNDER OATH?
At the 2007 trial, under oath Dr. Courtland created a story that she was being sexually assaulted by me during her 'second' treatment session for her uterine prolapse on 12/17/2004.
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月17日第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
在2007法庭宣誓后，V.C.博士编了一个故事，说是她在2004年12月17日第二次找我给她治疗子宫下垂时，受到我的性骚扰。
Regarding the issue whether there was the said 'second treatment', Mrs. Courtland and her husband (MR. Courtland) provided the following contradicted statements under oath：
(A) Mrs. Courtland told the Jury under oath that her mother took her for the said second treatment [see part (A) below].
(B) MR. Courtland said that her wife's mother "did not attend“ [see part (B) below].
关于是否有所谓的第二次治疗，V.C.说，是她母亲车她来来做第二次治疗的 【见下面 的（A）】； 但是，V她先生证词则完全同她的相反。他说，V.C. 的母亲根本就没在场 【见下面 (B)]。
According to V.C., her husband arrived in Seattle "around 12/22/2004" (see FACT-56 below). In another words, her husband had not been in Seattle on 12/17/2004 which was the day so-called 'second' treatment session.
23
WHEN DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
DECLARE PUBLICLY THAT
CHARLIE CHENG "WOULD KILL" HER?
WHEN DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
DECLARE PUBLICLY THAT
CHARLIE CHENG "WOULD KILL" HER?
At the 2007 trial, when V.C. was asked why did she wait 18-months long to make the alleged event? She gave two reasons
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her. (See FACT-G, infra)
under oath: (1) She was afraid that I "would be retribution for calling the police." （2）I "would kill" her. (See FACT-G, infra)
24
IS IT TRUE THAT
IS IT TRUE THAT
Above Superior Court's 2/25/2019 Order was prepared by the Prosecutor upon Mrs. Courtland's request, it states, "V.C. does not want any future restitution or interest payments. Therefore, restitution payment to V.C. (DOB ...) are terminated." (see above FACT-B )
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见上面FACT-B)。
最高法院的2019年2月25日命令是由检查官根据V.C.博士的要求而执笔。上面写着：”根据V.C.的请求，终止对V.C.的赔款”（见上面FACT-B)。
25
DID CHARLIE CHENG HAVE A FAIR TRIAL?
你有没有受到公平的审判？
DID CHARLIE CHENG HAVE A FAIR TRIAL?
你有没有受到公平的审判？
No. I didn't have a fair trial. For example, my constitution right to have my own witness had been deprived by the trial Court (see Attorney Scott J. Engelhard's email dated 6/1/2007, below)
我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。
我是官方违反美国宪法第六修正案的受害者（法官不许我的女病人为我作证），（请看下面律师给我的电邮）。
What's your former female patients' response after you being convicted?
After I was wrongfully convicted, Judge Nicole Macinnes received many of opposing letters from my former female patients (see FACT-26 below).
在我被冤判后，我的病人们纷纷写信给审判庭法官、替我伸冤。
For example, Christine E. D., health care provider, wrote to the Judge, "I believe that allegations against Dr. Cheng must be invented for whatever reason by the two women who made them ... How could be convicted on the basis of two former patients who were seen by him decades apart? ... Please not allow a miscarriage of justice!"
26
WHY DID JUSTICE SHERYL G. MACLOUD
(she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) MEET
CHARLIE CHENG IN PERSON IN THE JAIL?
WHY DID JUSTICE SHERYL G. MACLOUD
(she's a super defense lawyer in 2007) MEET
CHARLIE CHENG IN PERSON IN THE JAIL?
After I was wrongfully convicted for the sex crime I had not committed, Honorable Justice Sheryl G. MacCloud (she was a famous defense lawyer in 2007) met me in person at the King County jail for the purpose to help my appeal.
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
当我在2007年6月13日被陪审团误判有罪后，华州最高法院现任大法官（当时她是上诉律师）亲自到监狱来看我、要求替我上诉。
27
WHAT'S THE NATUTUR OF COUNT-ONE
CHARGE AGAINST CHARLIE CHENG?
WHAT'S THE NATUTUR OF COUNT-ONE
CHARGE AGAINST CHARLIE CHENG?
The Count One charge was K.R.'s 1998 false allegations which on 11/13/2001 the Department of Health has found any professional misconduct on my side (details see Kathy R.) And, none of the Seattle Police detective had interviewed me regarding K.R.'s false allegation.
27
WHY DOES CHARLIE CHENG FORGIVE
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND FOR
HER FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST
HIM MADE TO THE PUBLIC?
WHY DOES CHARLIE CHENG FORGIVE
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND FOR
HER FALSE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST
HIM MADE TO THE PUBLIC?
It was based upon Jesus' teaching that “if you do not forgive, neither will your Father is in heaven forgive your trespasses.” (see the POSTSCRIPT at pages 208-209 of "FORGIVENESS: An Innocent Prisoner's Testimony", my 2017 memoir).
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
之所以我选择了宽恕她们，是本着 耶稣的教导，“你们若不饶恕人，你们在天上的父也不饶恕你们的过犯” 。 有关此内容，已经在本人回忆录《我饶恕他们：一个无辜囚犯的证词》的第208-209页（《后记》篇）有登出。
28
HOW HAD YOU BEEN TREATING BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DURING Y
OUR 7-YEAR PRISON TIME?
HOW HAD YOU BEEN TREATING BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DURING Y
OUR 7-YEAR PRISON TIME?
AI had been treating quiet respectfully by the officers of DOC (Department of Corrections) staff at the prison.
I'd like to give special thanks to these officers: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
I'd like to give special thanks to these officers: David Pittsenbarger, Melisa McVicker, Paul Barajas, George McCabe, Richard Brown, Jason Finke, Craig Scott, Susan Poland, Belinda Caobin, R. Rambow, Brian Roberts, Nate Brum, Chad Chambers, Sgt. Richairson, Sgt. Geoffrey Smith, Sgt. Semmon, Sam Estep, Jannifer Ridgewood, Nicolas Lundgren, Michael King, Jason Finke, Dennis Able, Mr. Bellenger, Feresa R. Rees, Joa Chrispher, Hamble hardier, Counselor Rollins, Counselor C. Steele, Counselor Devin Hughs, Conselor Curt McDonnal, etc.
29
SHY DO YOU FEEL YOUR LIFE IS IN DANGER
SINCE YOU EXPOSED THIS INJUSTICE CASE?
SHY DO YOU FEEL YOUR LIFE IS IN DANGER
SINCE YOU EXPOSED THIS INJUSTICE CASE?
Because of the growing bias and racism against Asian American.
30
WHEN DID THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ISSUED ITS FACT FINDINGS INDICATES THAT
YOU WERE NOT GUILTY FOR K.R.'S 1998
ALLEGATIONS (i.e., COUNT ONE IN 2006)?
WHEN DID THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
ISSUED ITS FACT FINDINGS INDICATES THAT
YOU WERE NOT GUILTY FOR K.R.'S 1998
ALLEGATIONS (i.e., COUNT ONE IN 2006)?
On November 13, 2001, the DOH issued its order below.
31
WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME VICTORIA
FORESTER COURTLAND MEET YOU?
WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME VICTORIA
FORESTER COURTLAND MEET YOU?
I knew Victoria Forester-Courtland since 1998. That time her name was "Victoria Forester". She was referred to me by her friend "Mitch" (see below), a psychologist who's a years-long client of me, because Victoria Forester felt down from a ladder and injured herself during a work.
32
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU GIVE VICTORIA
FORESTER COURTLAND A TREATMENT?
WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME YOU GIVE VICTORIA
FORESTER COURTLAND A TREATMENT?
Mrs. Courtland accused that I gave her treatment in December of 2004. This is a lie! According to her record, her last teimentt day was July 2nd of 2002. That time her name was not "Courtland" but "Forester", i.e., Victoria Forester (see below). This is my evidence to prove the crucial fact that I did not treat V.C.'s uterine prolapse in her December-2004 visit.
33
IS IT TRUETHAT ON 06/07/2006 V.C. TOLD THE DETECTIVE
SHE HAD PICTURES TAKE WITH CHARLIE CHENG, BUT AT
THE 06/05/2007 TRIAL, SHE DENIED UNDER OATH?
IS IT TRUETHAT ON 06/07/2006 V.C. TOLD THE DETECTIVE
SHE HAD PICTURES TAKE WITH CHARLIE CHENG, BUT AT
THE 06/05/2007 TRIAL, SHE DENIED UNDER OATH?
Yes, It's true!
Regarding whether V.C. had the copy of photography showing she and me together, V.C. had two opposite versions:
On June 7 of 2006, she told the Detective she had the picture (see FACT-Q below);
Regarding whether V.C. had the copy of photography showing she and me together, V.C. had two opposite versions:
On June 7 of 2006, she told the Detective she had the picture (see FACT-Q below);
However, on June 7 of 2006, at the trial V.C. denied under oath (see FACT-R below);
34
WHY DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
NOT CALL THE POLICE IN 2004, BUT
RATHER WAIT TO 06/06/2006?
WHY DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
NOT CALL THE POLICE IN 2004, BUT
RATHER WAIT TO 06/06/2006?
Regarding the issue why Dr. Courtland did not report to the Police in 2004 but rather waited to 2006, at the 6/5/2007 trial, she gave three reasons under oath:
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
(1) "I am afraid that ... there would be a retribution for calling the police"; and
(2) "my greatest fear was that he would kill me, and it was a big fear.' (see her testimony below.)
Question:
Can you understand V.C.'s above logic?
Can you understand V.C.'s above logic?
35
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE ACCUSER K.R.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE ACCUSER K.R.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
It was on 12/15/2004. Victoria Forester Courtland paid $48 with check No. 1138 (see FACT-L below) . (NOTE: V.C. didn't provide the copy of this check to the Prosecutor's Office. See the Prosecutor's response on FACT_O, infra)，
36
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE K.R.'S FRIEND B.C.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE K.R.'S FRIEND B.C.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
It was on 12/17/2004. Victoria Forester Courtland paid $48 with check No. 1139 (see FACT-M below) . (NOTE: V.C. didn't provide the copy of this check to the Prosecutor's Office. See the Prosecutor's response on FACT_O, infra)，
37
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE K.R.'S FRIEND C.B.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
WHEN DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND
PURCHASE K.R.'S FRIEND C.B.'S INFORMATION
FOR HER FUTURE BOOK ABOUT MR. CHENG?
It was on 12/21/2004. Victoria Forester Courtland paid $48 with check No. 1140 (see FACT-N below) . (NOTE: V.C. didn't provide the copy of this check to the Prosecutor's Office. See the Prosecutor's response on FACT_O, infra)，
38
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND CLAIMED THAT
SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER THE INCIDENT DATE,
DID V.C. SUBMIT ABOVE 3 COPIES OF HER
12/2004 CHECKS TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT?
VICTORIA F. COURTLAND CLAIMED THAT
SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER THE INCIDENT DATE,
DID V.C. SUBMIT ABOVE 3 COPIES OF HER
12/2004 CHECKS TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT?
No. Victoria F. Courtland did not submit the copies of her above 3 checks (#1138, #1139, #1140) which are the key evidence to prove the fact that V.C.'s three visits in December of 2004 were to purchase accuser K.R.'s and her K.R.'s friends B.C.'s and C.B.'s contact information but not for the so-called 'uterrine prolapse treatment' .
The only physical evidence Mrs. Victoria Courtland provided to the Court was the following V.C.'s Consolidated Statement from her bank for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005 (see "FACT-K") , which doesn't show on which day V.C. had seen Charlie Cheng, or for treating her the non-existing uterine prolapse.
The only physical evidence Mrs. Victoria Courtland provided to the Court was the following V.C.'s Consolidated Statement from her bank for the period of 12/9/2004-1/10/2005 (see "FACT-K") , which doesn't show on which day V.C. had seen Charlie Cheng, or for treating her the non-existing uterine prolapse.
39
DID MRS. VICTORIA COURTLAND SUBMIT
ABOVE-MENTIONED THREE 2004 CHECKS
TO THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE?
DID MRS. VICTORIA COURTLAND SUBMIT
ABOVE-MENTIONED THREE 2004 CHECKS
TO THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE?
According to the Prosecutor's statement at the 06/05/2007 public Court, V.C. hided these three checks, the core evidence, from the Seattle Police and the Prosecutor's Office (see FACT-O below).
40
WHEN DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
KNOW THAT CHARLIE CHENG'S TREATMENT
DOES NOT TOUCH SEXUAL ORGANS?
WHEN DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND
KNOW THAT CHARLIE CHENG'S TREATMENT
DOES NOT TOUCH SEXUAL ORGANS?
On 07/02/2002 - three years before Mrs. Victoria Forester created the false story that massaging her sexual organs to treat her 'uterine prolapse' in 2004 - V.C. had known that the nature of Charlie Cheng's treatment does not touch sex organs. This fact had been documented in the Patient's Consent form (see FACT-P below).
41
HOW DID YOU APPEALED YOUR CASE?
HOW DID YOU APPEALED YOUR CASE?
On my sentence day, September 7th of 2007, my appellate attorney was presented.
I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014).
I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.
I lost my appeal because of the lack of adequate appeal funds -- I had to appeal on my own while serving my sentence in prison (2007-2014).
I appealed myself being denied repeately because the appellate courts were unable to understand my poor English, and I was lack of the knowledge of law.
42
HAD THE JURY HEARD YOUR TRUTH
TESTIMONY IN YOUR OWN ENGLISH?
HAD THE JURY HEARD YOUR TRUTH
TESTIMONY IN YOUR OWN ENGLISH?
No.
Upon my defense attorney's request, my entire testimony at the 2007 trial was made in Mandarin Chinese, which was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter to translate Mandarin to English.
In another words, the co-called my testimony at the 2007 Court was NOT my real words because the interpreter added some her own words or mistranslation (infra).
(NOTE: I did report the interpreter's violation to the State but was rejected because the statute of limitation has been expired.)
Upon my defense attorney's request, my entire testimony at the 2007 trial was made in Mandarin Chinese, which was translated to English through an interpreter who was not a court-certified interpreter to translate Mandarin to English.
In another words, the co-called my testimony at the 2007 Court was NOT my real words because the interpreter added some her own words or mistranslation (infra).
(NOTE: I did report the interpreter's violation to the State but was rejected because the statute of limitation has been expired.)
43
HOW DID THE COURT-APPOINTED INTERPRETER
MISTRASLATE YOUR WORDS TO THE COURT?
HOW DID THE COURT-APPOINTED INTERPRETER
MISTRASLATE YOUR WORDS TO THE COURT?
Marisa Hsu was my first court-appointed interpreter (see FACT-T, below). Below is her self introduction to the public court.
Some of her translations are appropriate but some are not because Mrs. Hsu could not follow up what I had said to the Jury in my Mandarin Chinese, and she only understood part of my words in Maderin. (See FACT-U, below).
Because she added a non-existing fact that I used other method 'touched' female's breasts (see FACT-V below). Touching female's breasts is element of crime; As result, I was being wrongfully charged and sentenced.
44
IS IT TRUE THAT V.C. DIDN'T TELL HER HUSBAND
THE NON-EXISTING 2004 SEXUAL ASSAULT WHEN HER
HUSBAND HAD BEEN WITH HER BEFORE 12/29/2004?
IS IT TRUE THAT V.C. DIDN'T TELL HER HUSBAND
THE NON-EXISTING 2004 SEXUAL ASSAULT WHEN HER
HUSBAND HAD BEEN WITH HER BEFORE 12/29/2004?
When was the first time V.C. told her husband about the non-existing December-2004 sex assault, it's an important factor to determine whether Victoria Forester Courtland's accusation was true or false.
V.C.'s sworn statement at the open court was: "I choice talk to him as soon after it happened as I could." (See supra VERSION-3). I.e., V.C. told her husband Matt when Matt was in Seattle when they stayed with her sister Susan's house.
However, according to Mr.'s Courtland's sworn statement below (FACT-14) V.C. did NOT telld him the non-existing '2004 touching' in Seattle. Mr. Courtland sait that he was informed when they back to their home in the East Coast (See FACT-14 below).
V.C.'s sworn statement at the open court was: "I choice talk to him as soon after it happened as I could." (See supra VERSION-3). I.e., V.C. told her husband Matt when Matt was in Seattle when they stayed with her sister Susan's house.
However, according to Mr.'s Courtland's sworn statement below (FACT-14) V.C. did NOT telld him the non-existing '2004 touching' in Seattle. Mr. Courtland sait that he was informed when they back to their home in the East Coast (See FACT-14 below).
Mrs. Courtland said, "I ended up going home, I believe, on the 29th or the 30th" (see FACT-55 below). In another words, from 12/17/2004, the so-called sexual assault day, to 12/29/2004 (12 days), Victoria Forester Courtland had been with her husband in Seattle.
Why did V.C. not tell her husband within the 12 days? V.C. said, "There was not a lot of privacy time" See FACT-15 (infra).
Why did V.C. not tell her husband within the 12 days? V.C. said, "There was not a lot of privacy time" See FACT-15 (infra).
45
WHY DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND NOT
TELL HER HUSBAND THE ALLEGED ASSAULT
WHILE THEY STAYED IN SEATTLE,?
WHY DID VICTORIA F. COURTLAND NOT
TELL HER HUSBAND THE ALLEGED ASSAULT
WHILE THEY STAYED IN SEATTLE,?
At the public trial, V.C. claimed that in her 'second treatment session' (on 12/17/2004) she had been inappropriately touched by Charlie Cheng, but she didn't tell her husband when her husband picked up her after the said 'second treatment session.'
V.C. said, because they didn't have their own car (see FACT-15 below).
V.C. said, because they didn't have their own car (see FACT-15 below).
46
DID THE COURT GRANT THE $12,372.00 AS
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND ASKED?
DID THE COURT GRANT THE $12,372.00 AS
VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND ASKED?
V.C.'s goal for the trial was to get "approximately $11,372.00, and anticipate spending at least another thousant" (see lines 4-11 in FACT-W below).
Unfortunately, 98 % of the restitution money Mrs. Courtland asked was not being proved by the Court. Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a 5-digit of restitution but was granted for 3-digit restitution. (See the 2-page Court's Order dated 12/13/2007 in FACT-W below).
Unfortunately, 98 % of the restitution money Mrs. Courtland asked was not being proved by the Court. Victoria Forester Courtland asked for a 5-digit of restitution but was granted for 3-digit restitution. (See the 2-page Court's Order dated 12/13/2007 in FACT-W below).
47
VICTORIA COURTLAND SAID THAT IN 2015
SHE'S AFRAID ME TO CALL THE POLICE.
WHY DID IN 2016 V.C. MAKE A FALSE
REPORT TO THE SEATTLE POLICE?
VICTORIA COURTLAND SAID THAT IN 2015
SHE'S AFRAID ME TO CALL THE POLICE.
WHY DID IN 2016 V.C. MAKE A FALSE
REPORT TO THE SEATTLE POLICE?
Mrs. Courtland's reason was, as she said, "I was afraid that Dr. Cheng would be retribution for calling the police" (see FACT-16 below).
Does Mrs. Victoria Forester Courtland's above public statements make sense to you?
48
WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME VICTORIA COURTLAND
KNOW THAT SHE HAD 'UTERINE PROLAPSE'?
WHEN WAS THE FIRST TIME VICTORIA COURTLAND
KNOW THAT SHE HAD 'UTERINE PROLAPSE'?
I was charged with 'second-degree rape' because at the 2007 public trial, accuser Victoria Forester Courtland ("V.C.") made a false statement to the public that I 'quickly inserted' my finger into her vagina to treat her 'uterine prolapse' on 12/17/2004.
Whether V.C. really had the said 'uterine prolapse' in December of 2004 when she met me is the core issue to determine whether I have commited the said 'second-degree rape' crim.
On 06/07/2004 at the trial, Ms.Detective told the Jury that when V.C. visited me in December of 2004, V.C. had not been diagnosed with the said "uterine prolapse" (see FACT-59 supra).
Regarding when was the first time V.C. know that she had the prolapse, accuser V.C. provided two contrary statements public.:
(1) )n 06/04/2007 where she said that she knew it "immediately after her daughter was born in December of 2004." (See FACT- 57 below);
(2) On 06/05/2007, V.C. changed to opposed story (see FACT-58 infra).
Whether V.C. really had the said 'uterine prolapse' in December of 2004 when she met me is the core issue to determine whether I have commited the said 'second-degree rape' crim.
On 06/07/2004 at the trial, Ms.Detective told the Jury that when V.C. visited me in December of 2004, V.C. had not been diagnosed with the said "uterine prolapse" (see FACT-59 supra).
Regarding when was the first time V.C. know that she had the prolapse, accuser V.C. provided two contrary statements public.:
(1) )n 06/04/2007 where she said that she knew it "immediately after her daughter was born in December of 2004." (See FACT- 57 below);
(2) On 06/05/2007, V.C. changed to opposed story (see FACT-58 infra).
49
V.C. CLAIMED THAT SHE'D BEEN SEXUALLY
TOUCHED IN HER SECOND SESSION. DID SHE
COME BACK FOR A THIRD SESSION?
V.C. CLAIMED THAT SHE'D BEEN SEXUALLY
TOUCHED IN HER SECOND SESSION. DID SHE
COME BACK FOR A THIRD SESSION?
Victoria Forester Courtland created the non-existing story that she saw me three times in December of 2004 for her uterine prolapse.
According to V.C.'s 06/05/2007 public statement, she came back to see me again after the said second treatment session. (See lines 13-25 in FACT-61 below.)
According to V.C.'s 06/05/2007 public statement, she came back to see me again after the said second treatment session. (See lines 13-25 in FACT-61 below.)
50
WHEN DID V.C. CLAIM THAT SHE FILLED OUT
A TREATMENT FORM IN HER SECOND VISIT
BUT SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER HER SYMPTOMS?
WHEN DID V.C. CLAIM THAT SHE FILLED OUT
A TREATMENT FORM IN HER SECOND VISIT
BUT SHE DIDN'T REMEMBER HER SYMPTOMS?
It was on 06/05/2007 at the Court (see FACT-66 below).
51
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND HIDE
THE KEY EVIDENCE (THE COPIES OF HER
CASHED CHECKS NO.1135, 1136 & 1137)
FROM THE DETECTIVE OR PROSECUTOR?
DID VICTORIA FORESTER COURTLAND HIDE
THE KEY EVIDENCE (THE COPIES OF HER
CASHED CHECKS NO.1135, 1136 & 1137)
FROM THE DETECTIVE OR PROSECUTOR?
At the 2007 trial, when defense attorney Scott Engelhard presented the copies of V.C.'s three cashed checks - No. 1138 (see FACT-L in supra A&Q #35), No 1139 (see FACT-M in supra A&Q #36) and No. 1140 (see FACT-N in supra A&Q #37) - to State's-witness Victoria Forester Courtland, Prosecutor Ms. J. was surprised because she did not know that the defense attorney had them already (see FACT-O in supra A&Q 39).
Had Mrs. V.C. provided these three important evidence (the copies of her cashed checks) to the law enforcement, the copies of V.C.'s three checks should have been listed in the Prosecutor's Exhibits and they should have been documented in the following official "LIST OF EXHIBITS" (see below FACT-67 and FACT-68).
Had Mrs. V.C. provided these three important evidence (the copies of her cashed checks) to the law enforcement, the copies of V.C.'s three checks should have been listed in the Prosecutor's Exhibits and they should have been documented in the following official "LIST OF EXHIBITS" (see below FACT-67 and FACT-68).
Unfortunately, the Prosecutor was not able to provided the said three copies of V.C.'s cashed checks to the trial Court (see above). On the contrary, Defendant Charlie Cheng did (see above). Because V.C.'s three copies of cashed check had proved the fact that she did not pay Charlie Cheng for the said treatments. (V.C. claimed that she was sexuallly assaulted by Charlie Cheng during the December-2004 treatment sessions.)
In order to share GOD's Mercy,
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under
injustice (as I'd suffered),
I disclosed my real case with
undeniable evidence in this webside:
TELLING THE TRUTH.
Hopefully, this online memoir will be an
useful reference for law students, justice
workers and all American families.
为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。
and to prevent more innocent
persons be mistreated under
injustice (as I'd suffered),
I disclosed my real case with
undeniable evidence in this webside:
TELLING THE TRUTH.
Hopefully, this online memoir will be an
useful reference for law students, justice
workers and all American families.
为了分享神的恩典和防止更多的无辜者受到
不公平的审判，我决定将自己经历过的苦难
通过无可反驳的证据公布与此；希望有益于社会。
Under construction ... more coming soon
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
本网站仍在编辑中，请将建议电邮到：cyc1688@hotmail.com
